In the shadow of Title IX's 50th anniversary in 2022, it is fitting to investigate whether female elite swimmers are rewarded the same way male swimmers are. This article thus contributes to the growing literature on gender differences in performance and pay in sport. Our article frames this question in a unique way, as we compare the extent of economic exploitation of women and men in elite swimming. Are female swimmers “underpaid” relative to their marginal revenue products at the same level as their male counterparts?
AcostaR. V.CarpenterL. J. (2012). Women in intercollegiate sport: A longitudinal, national study. Thirty-five year update, 1977-2012. Brooklyn College.
BrownR. W. (1994). Measuring cartel rents in the college basketball player recruitment market. Applied Economics, 26(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849400000058
8.
BrownR. W. (2011). Research note: Estimates of college football player rents. Journal of Sports Economics, 12(2), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002510378333
9.
BrownR. W.JewellR. T. (2004). Measuring marginal revenue product in college athletics: Updated estimates. In Economics of college sports (pp. 153–162). Praeger.
10.
HallR. L.OglesbyC. A. (2016). Stepping through the looking glass: The future for women in sport. Sex Roles, 74(7), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0572-z
11.
HarrisJ. S. (2020). It is not easy being green: Gender and earnings in professional swim. In The economics of aquatic sports (pp. 93–98). Springer. https://www.teamusa.org/about-the-usopc
LaneE.NagelJ.NetzJ. S. (2014). Alternative approaches to measuring MRP: Are all men’s college basketball players exploited?Journal of Sports Economics, 15(3), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002512453144
14.
LaskowS. (2014). The Olympics are the closest to coverage parity female athletes get. Columbia Journalism Review, 24. Retrieved from http://www.cjr.org/full_court_press/women_olympics_coverage.php
15.
ScullyG. W. (1974). Pay and performance in major league baseball. The American Economic Review, 64(6), 915–930. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1815242
16.
Shields, et al. v. Federation Internationale de Natation. Case No. 18-cv-07394-JSC, Dkt. No. 100.