This paper examines the incentive effects of increased prize differentials and productivity spillovers from substitute coworkers within the context of esports. A direct behavioral measure called “actions per minute (APM)” is utilized to gauge Dota 2 players’ on-field exertion of effort dedicated to winning the game. The results based on empirical analysis support the incentive effects of the convex prize structure of esports tournaments on eliciting effort. Further investigation indicates that the incentive effects of high-stakes esports tournaments are more a result of the size of total prize than the relative prize distribution. It is also found that players who serve subordinate roles are more likely to engage in shirking behavior in the presence of teammates with similar roles.
ArcidiaconoP.KinslerJ.PriceJ. (2016). Productivity spillovers in team production: Evidence from professional basketball. Journal of Labor Economics, 35(1), 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1086/687529
4.
BeckerB. E.HuselidM. A. (1992). The incentive effects of tournament compensation systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(2), 336–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393228
5.
BrownJ. (2011). Quitters never win: The (adverse) incentive effects of competing with superstars. Journal of Political Economy, 119(5), 982–1013. https://doi.org/10.1086/663306
6.
BrownJ.MinorD. B. (2014). Selecting the best? Spillover and shadows in elimination tournaments. Management Science, 60(12), 3087–3102. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2014
7.
BurkD. L. (2013). Owning E-sports: Proprietary rights in professional computer gaming. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161(6), 1535–1578.
CardD.DahlG. B. (2011). Family violence and football: The effect of unexpected emotional cues on violent behavior*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 103–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr001
10.
CoatesD.ParshakovP. (2016). Team vs. individual tournaments: Evidence from prize structure in ESports. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 138/EC/ 2016. National Research University Higher School of Economics.
11.
ConnellyB. L.TihanyiL.CrookT. R.GangloffK. A. (2014). Tournament theory: Thirty years of contests and competitions. Journal of Management, 40(1), 16–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313498902
12.
CornelissenT.DustmannC.SchönbergU. (2017). Peer effects in the workplace. The American Economic Review, 107(2), 425–456. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141300
DanilovA.HarbringC.IrlenbuschB. (2019). Helping under a combination of team and tournament incentives. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 162, 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.03.013
15.
DeckC.KimbroughE. O. (2015). Single- and double-elimination all-pay tournaments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.05.019
16.
EhrenbergR. G.BognannoM. L. (1990a). The incentive effects of tournaments revisited: Evidence from the European PGA tour. ILR Review, 43(3), 74–S. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399004300305
17.
EhrenbergR. G.BognannoM. L. (1990b). Do tournaments have incentive effects?Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1307–1324. https://doi.org/10.1086/261736
18.
ElsayedN.ElbardanH. (2018). Investigating the associations between executive compensation and firm performance: Agency theory or tournament theory. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-03-2015-0027
19.
ErikssonT. (1999). Executive compensation and tournament theory: Empirical tests on danish data. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(2), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1086/209920
20.
FuQ.KeC.TanF. (2015). “Success breeds success” or “pride goes before a fall”?: Teams and individuals in multi-contest tournaments. Games and Economic Behavior, 94, 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2015.09.002
21.
GilsdorfK. F.SukhatmeV. A. (2008). Testing rosen's sequential elimination tournament model: Incentives and player performance in professional tennis. Journal of Sports Economics, 9(3), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002507306790
22.
GoergS. J.KubeS.ZultanR. (2010). Treating equals unequally: Incentives in teams, workers’ motivation, and production technology. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(4), 747–772. https://doi.org/10.1086/653487
23.
GouldE. D.WinterE. (2009). Interactions between workers and the technology of production: Evidence from professional baseball. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.1.188
24.
GreeneW. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed). Prentice Hall.
HerbstD.MasA. (2015). Peer effects on worker output in the laboratory generalize to the field. Science (New York, N.Y.), 350(6260), 545–549. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac9555
27.
HeymanF. (2005). Pay inequality and firm performance: Evidence from matched employer–employee data. Applied Economics, 37(11), 1313–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500142101
IchinoA.MaggiG. (2000). Work environment and individual background: Explaining regional shirking differentials in a large Italian firm*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 1057–1090. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554890
31.
LazearE. P.RosenS. (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841–864. https://doi.org/10.1086/261010
32.
LewisJ.TrinhP.KirshD. (2011). A corpus analysis of strategy video game play in starcraft: Brood war. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 33(33). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3f69f8s4
33.
LinY.-F.YehY. M. C.ShihY.-T. (2013). Tournament theory's perspective of executive pay gaps. Journal of Business Research, 66(5), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.04.003
34.
LynchJ. G.ZaxJ. S. (2000). The rewards to running: Prize structure and performance in professional road racing. Journal of Sports Economics, 1(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/152700250000100401
35.
MaloneyM. T.McCormickR. E. (2000). The response of workers to wages in tournaments: Evidence from foot races. Journal of Sports Economics, 1(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/152700250000100201
36.
MaoE. (2021). The structural characteristics of esports gaming and their behavioral implications for high engagement: A competition perspective and a cross-cultural examination. Addictive Behaviors, 123, 107056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107056
RosenS. (1986). Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 701–715.
40.
SeoY.JungS.-U. (2016). Beyond solitary play in computer games: The social practices of eSports. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(3), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514553711
41.
ShenkmanE.CoatesD.ChadovA.ParshakovP. (2022). Team vs. Individual tournament: An organizer's dilemma. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 198, 476–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.04.012
42.
StantonI.WilliamsV. V. (2013). The structure, efficacy, and manipulation of double-elimination tournaments. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 9(4), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2012-0055
43.
ThompsonJ. J.BlairM. R.ChenL.HenreyA. J. (2013). Video game telemetry as a critical tool in the study of complex skill learning. PLOS ONE, 8(9), e75129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075129
44.
WagnerM. G. (2006). On the scientific relevance of eSports. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet Computing & Conference on Computer Games Development, ICOMP, Las Vegas, NE.
