This paper considers recent and historical changes in the three-point line distance at the NCAA and NBA levels as an example of policy change with highly-measurable outcome(s). The paper presents several empirical tests describing a point-maximizing basketball team's optimal allocation of two-point and three-point shots. It does so primarily in the context that the NCAA Men's Basketball three-point line was extended from 20′9″ to 21′9″ in advance of the 2019–20 season, and similar analysis for the NBA in the 1990s. We find that a three-point line extension significantly lowers three- and two-point shot proficiency, while decreasing (increasing) three-point (two-point) shot volume.
BoudreauJ.EhrlichJ.RazaM. F.SandersS. (2018). The likelihood of social choice violations in rank sum scoring: Algorithms and evidence from NCAA cross country running. Public Choice, 174(3–4), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0494-0
2.
BrownE.SpiroR.KeenanD. (1991). Wage and nonwage discriminbation in professional basketball: Do fans affect it?The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 50(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1991.tb02300.x
3.
ChanH. F.SavageD. A.TorglerB. (2018). There and back again: Adaptation after repeated rule changes of the game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75(Part B), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.12.003
4.
ChangY. M.SandersS. D. (2009). Corruption on the court: The causes and social consequences of point-shaving in NCAA basketball. Review of Law & Economics, 5(1), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1244
5.
DoucouliagosH.PaldamM.StanleyT. (2018). Skating on thin evidence: Implications for public policy. European Journal of Political Economy, 54, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.03.004
6.
GiftP. (2015). Sequential judgment effects in the workplace: Evidence from the national basketball association. Economic Inquiry, 53(2), 1259–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12186
7.
GoldmanM.RaoJ. M. (2011). Allocative and Dynamic Efficiency in NBA Decision Making. MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference.
8.
HofferA.PincinJ. A. (2019). Quantifying NFL players’ value with the help of vegas point spreads values. Journal of Sports Economics, 20(7), 959–974. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002519832060
9.
KahnL. (2009). The economics of discrimination: evidence from basketball. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 3987, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.
10.
KaminskiM. (2019). How strong are soccer teams? The Host Paradox and other counterintuitive properties of the FIFA ranking.
11.
McCannonB. C. (2011). Strategic offsetting behavior: Evidence from national collegiate athletic association men’s basketball. Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(4), 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2010.00243.x
12.
McCormickR. E.TollisonR. D. (1984). Crime on the court. The Journal of Political Economy, 92(2),223–235. https://doi.org/10.1086/261221
13.
McKenzieR.LeeD. (1990). Ending the free airplane rides of infants: A myopic method of saving lives. Briefing Paper 11 (August 30), Cato Institute, Washington, DC. Also printed in the Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Aviation of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation, House of Representatives, On Child Safety Systems on Aircraft, held July 12, 1990, 135–44.
14.
OliverD. (2004). Basketball on paper: rules and tools for performance analysis. Potomac Books, Inc.
15.
OlmosL.BellidoH.Roman-AsoJ. (2020). The effects of mega-events on perceived corruption. European Journal of Politcal Economy, 61, 101826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.101826
16.
PampO.DendorferF.ThurnerP. W. (2018). Arm your friends and save on defense? The impact of arms exports on military expenditures. Public Choice, 177(1), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0598-1
17.
PaulR. J.WeinbachA. P. (2011). Investigating allegations of pointshaving in NCAA basketball using actual sportsbook betting percentages. Journal of Sports Economics, 12(4), 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002510385904
18.
PelechrinisK. (2016). The anatomy of the three-point shot: Spatial bias, fractals and the three-point line in the NBA. Working Paper. School of Information Science. University of Pittsburgh.
19.
RimlerM.SongS.YiD. (2010). Estimating production efficiency in men’s NCAA college basketball: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Sports Economics, 11(3), 287–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002509337803
20.
RomanowichP.BourretJ.VollmerT. (2007). Further analysis of the matching law to describe two- and three-point shot allocation by professional basketball players. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 311–315. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.119-05
21.
SandersS. (2020). Economic thinking on the road (or thereabouts). In The economic reason (pp. 1–18). Springer.
22.
SandersS.PotterJ.EhrlichJ.PerlineJ.BoudreauxC. (2021). Informed voters and electoral outcomes: A natural experiment stemming from a fundamental information-technological shift. Public Choice, 189, 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00884-z
23.
SandersS.WeismanD. L.LiD. (2008). Child safety seats on commercial airliners: A demonstration of cross-price elasticities. The Journal of Economic Education, 39(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.39.2.135-144
24.
ShughartW. F.GoffB. L. (1992). Fields of dreams: On the construction of professional baseball talent in colleges and the minor leagues. In G. Scully (Eds.), Advances in the Economics of Sport, 1, (pp. 91–114). JAI Press Inc.
25.
SkinnerB. (2011). Scoring strategies for the underdog: A general, quantitative method for determining optimal sports strategies. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 7(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1364
26.
WolfersJ. (2006). Point shaving: Corruption in NCAA basketball. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 96(2), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806777211757
