The present study examines a specific type of referee biases, home bias, and analyzes how the presence of fans affects home bias by using NBA games played in empty arenas during the COVID-19 pandemic in the 2020–2021 season and matches played before the pandemic from 2017 to 2020. This research also uses a unique data set from NBA Last Two Minute Reports to assess referees’ performance at the play level. The findings show crowd support does not cause referees to treat home and away teams differently in crucial situations during the NBA regular season, contrary to the results in most prior studies.
AkerlofG. A. (1980). A theory of social custom, of which unemployment may be one consequence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(4), 749–775. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885667
3.
BeckerG. S.MurphyK. M. (2000). Social economics: Market behavior in a social environment. Harvard University Press.
4.
BenzL. S.LopezM. J. (2021). Estimating the change in soccer's home advantage during the COVID-19 pandemic using bivariate poisson regression. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-021-00413-9
5.
BernheimB. D. (1994). A theory of conformity. Journal of Political Economy, 102(5), 841–877. https://doi.org/10.1086/261957
6.
BoykoR. H.BoykoA. R.BoykoM. G. (2007). Referee bias contributes to home advantage in English premiership football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(11), 1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410601038576
7.
BrysonA.DoltonP.ReadeJ. J.SchreyerD.SingletonC. (2021). Causal effects of an absent crowd on performances and refereeing decisions during COVID-19. Economics Letters, 198, 109664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109664
8.
BuraimoB.ForrestD.SimmonsR. (2010). The 12th man?: Refereeing bias in English and German soccer. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 173(2), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00604.x
9.
BuraimoB.SemmelrothD.SimmonsR. (2017). Referee bias in football. In AlbertJ.GlickmanM. E.SwartzT. B.KoningR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of statistical methods and analyses in sports (pp. 417–440). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
10.
BuraimoB.SimmonsR.MaciaszczykM. (2012). Favoritism and referee bias in european soccer: Evidence from the spanish league and the UEFA champions league. Contemporary Economic Policy, 30(3), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00295.x
11.
CaudillS. B.Mixon JrF. G.WallaceS. (2014). Life on the red carpet: Star players and referee bias in the national basketball association. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 21(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2014.903110
12.
ConstantinouA. C.FentonN. E.PollockL. J. H. (2014). Bayesian Networks for unbiased assessment of referee bias in association football. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(5), 538–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.05.009
DawsonP.DobsonS. (2010). The influence of social pressure and nationality on individual decisions: Evidence from the behaviour of referees. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.06.001
15.
DawsonP.DobsonS.GoddardJ.WilsonJ. (2007). Are football referees really biased and inconsistent? Evidence on the incidence of disciplinary sanction in the English premier league. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 170(1), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00451.x
16.
DeutscherC. (2015). No referee bias in the NBA: New evidence with leagues’ assessment data. Journal of Sports Analytics, 1(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.3233/JSA-150012
EndrichM.GescheT. (2020). Home-bias in referee decisions: Evidence from “ghost matches” during the Covid19-pandemic. Economics Letters, 197, 109621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109621
20.
FerraresiM.GucciardiG. (2021). Who chokes on a penalty kick? Social environment and individual performance during COVID-19 times. Economics Letters, 203, 109868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109868
21.
FischerK.HaucapJ. (2021). Does crowd support drive the home advantage in professional football? Evidence from German ghost games during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sports Economics, 22(8), 982–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025211026552
22.
GaricanoL.Palacios-HuertaI.PrendergastC. (2005). Favoritism under social pressure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653053970267
HiggsN.StavnessI. (2021). Bayesian analysis of home advantage in North American professional sports before and during COVID-19. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93533-w
25.
JohnstonR. (2008). On referee bias, crowd size, and home advantage in the English soccer premiership. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(6), 563–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701736780
26.
Leota, J., Hoffman, D., Mascaro, L., Czeisler, M. É., Nash, K., Drummond, S., Anderson, C., Rajaratnam, S. MW., & Facer-Childs, E. (2021). Home is where the hustle is: The influence of crowds on effort and home advantage in the National Basketball Association (Working Paper No. 3898283). Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3898283
27.
National Basketball Association (n.d.a). NBA Last Two Minute reports – frequently asked questions. NBA Official. https://official.nba.com/nba-last-two-minute-reports-frequently-asked-questions/.
28.
National Basketball Association (n.d.b). Triggers. NBA Official. https://official.nba.com/replay/triggers/.
29.
National Basketball Association (n.d.c). Rule No.12: Fouls and penalties. NBA Official. https://official.nba.com/rule-no-12-fouls-and-penalties/.
30.
National Basketball Association (n.d.d). Officiating opportunities. NBA Official. https://www.nbaofficials.com/.
31.
NevillA. M.BalmerN. J.WilliamsA. M. (2002). The influence of crowd noise and experience upon refereeing decisions in football. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3(4), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00033-4
32.
PageL.PageK. (2010). Evidence of referees’ national favoritism in rugby (NCER Working Paper Series No. 62). National Centre for Econometric Research. https://ideas.repec.org/p/qut/auncer/2010_09.html.
33.
Pettersson-LidbomP.PriksM. (2010). Behavior under social pressure: Empty Italian stadiums and referee bias. Economics Letters, 108(2), 212–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.04.023
34.
PollardR. (2008). Home advantage in football: A current review of an unsolved puzzle. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 1(1), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399X00801010012
35.
PonzoM.ScoppaV. (2018). Does the home advantage depend on crowd support? Evidence from same-stadium derbies. Journal of Sports Economics, 19(4), 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002516665794
36.
PopeB. R.PopeN. G. (2015). Own-nationality bias: Evidence from UEFA champions league football referees. Economic Inquiry, 53(2), 1292–1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12180
37.
PriceJ.RemerM.StoneD. F. (2012). Subperfect game: Profitable biases of NBA referees. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 21(1), 271–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2011.00325.x
ReadeJ. J.SchreyerD.SingletonC. (2020). Eliminating supportive crowds reduces referee bias (Working Paper No. 3743972). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3743972
40.
RochaB.SanchesF.SouzaI.Carlos Domingos da SilvaJ. (2013). Does monitoring affect corruption? Career concerns and home bias in football refereeing. Applied Economics Letters, 20(8), 728–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2012.736938
41.
RussellG. W. (1983). Crowd size and density in relation to athletic aggression and performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 11(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1983.11.1.9
42.
ScoppaV. (2008). Are subjective evaluations biased by social factors or connections? An econometric analysis of soccer referee decisions. Empirical Economics, 35(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0146-1
43.
ScoppaV. (2021). Social pressure in the stadiums: Do agents change behavior without crowd support?Journal of Economic Psychology, 82, 102344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2020.102344
44.
SorsF.GrassiM.AgostiniT.MurgiaM. (2021). The sound of silence in association football: Home advantage and referee bias decrease in matches played without spectators. European Journal of Sport Science, 21(12), 1597–1605. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1845814
WestonM.DrustB.AtkinsonG.GregsonW. (2011). Variability of soccer referees’ match performances. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 32(3), 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1269843
47.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage Learning.
48.
YewellK. G.CaudillS. B.Mixon JrF. G. (2014). Referee bias and stoppage time in major league soccer: A partially adaptive approach. Econometrics, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics2010001n
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
