Data from 16 years of NBA All-Star Games shows star power has two components. First, fans are drawn to live games featuring players whose current play is at a historically high skill level. Second, fans display attachment based on geographical proximity to a team, local superstar recognition, and team success. All-Star games are exhibitions with a roster of different levels of high skill level and attachment, while competitive games have these effects confounded and star players are sparse. The analysis uses a dynamic panel data model to account for differences in viewing between 56 Nielsen TV markets.
AlavyK.GaskellA.LeachS.SzymanskiS. (2010). On the edge of your seat: Demand for football on television and the uncertainty of outcome hypothesis. International Journal of Sport Finance, 5(2), 75–95.
BerriD. J.SchmidtM. B.BrookS. L. (2004). Stars at the gate: The impact of star power on NBA gate revenues. Journal of Sports Economics, 5(1), 33–50.
4.
BhattacharyaC. B.RaoH.GlynnM. A. (1995). Understanding the bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members. Journal of Marketing, 59(4), 46–57.
5.
BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76–88.
6.
BlundellR.BondS. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic plan data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
7.
BorlandJ.MacdonaldR. (2003). Demand for sport. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(4), 478–502.
8.
BrandesL.FranckE.NüeschS. (2008). Local heroes and superstars: An empirical analysis of star attraction in German soccer. Journal of Sports Economics, 9(3), 266–286.
9.
CialdiniR. B.BordenR. J.ThorneA.WalkerM. R.FreemanS.SloanL. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 366.
10.
CoatesD.HumphreysB. R. (2010). Week to week attendance and competitive balance in the National Football League. International Journal of Sport Finance, 5(4), 239–252.
11.
CroissantY.MilloG. (2008). Panel data econometrics in R: The PLM package. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(2), 1–43.
12.
FisherR. J.WakefieldK. (1998). Factors leading to group identification: A field study of winners and losers. Psychology & Marketing, 15(1), 23–40.
13.
ForrestD.SimmonsR.BuraimoB. (2005). Outcome uncertainty and the couch potato audience. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52, 641–661.
14.
FunkD. C.JamesJ. (2001). The psychological continuum model: A conceptual framework for understanding an individual’s psychological connection to sport. Sport Management Review, 4(2), 119–150.
15.
FunkD. C.RidingerL. L.MoormanA. M. (2004). Exploring origins of involvement: Understanding the relationship between consumer motives and involvement with professional sport teams. Leisure Sciences, 26(1), 35–61.
GrimshawS. D.BurwellS. J. (2014). Choosing the most popular NFL games in a local TV market. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 10(3), 329–343.
18.
HausmanY. A.LeonardG. K. (1997). Superstars in the National Basketball Association: Economic value and policy. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(4), 586–624.
JaneW. J. (2016). The effect of star quality on attendance demand: The case of the National Basketball Association. Journal of Sports Economics, 17(4), 396–417.
22.
KappeE. R.BlankA. S.DesarboW. (2014). A general multiple distributed lag framework for estimating the dynamic effects of promotions. Management Science, 60(6), 1489–1510.
23.
LewisM.YoonY. (2018). An empirical examination of the development and impact of star power in Major League Baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 19(2), 155–187.
24.
LockD.TaylorT.DarcyS. (2011). In the absence of achievement: The formation of new team identification. European Sport Management Quarterly, 11(2), 171–192.
25.
MullinC. J.DunnL. F. (2002). Using baseball card prices to measure star quality and monopsony. Economic Inquiry, 40(4), 620–632.
26.
NickellS. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426.
27.
OrmistonR. (2014). Attendance effects of star pitchers in Major League Baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 15(4), 338–364.
28.
PeelD. A.ThomasD. A. (1992). The demand for football: Some evidence on outcome uncertainty. Empirical Economics, 17(2), 323–331.
RoodmanD. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.
31.
RosenS. (1981). The economics of superstars. The American Economic Review, 71(5), 845–858.
32.
RottenbergS. (2000). Resource allocation and income distribution in professional team sports. Journal of Sports Economics, 1(1), 11–20.
33.
SuttonW. A.McDonaldM. A.MilneG. R.CimpermanJ. (1997). Creating and fostering fan identification in professional sports. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 6(1), 15–22.
34.
TainskyS. (2010). Television broadcast demand for National Football League contests. Journal of Sports Economics, 11(6), 629–640.
35.
ThomsonM. (2006). Human brands: Investigating antecedents to consumers’ strong attachments to celebrities. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 104–119.
36.
WannD. L. (2006). The causes and consequences of sport team identification. In RaneyA. A.BryantJ. (Eds.), Handbook of sports and media (pp. 358–382). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37.
WannD. L.BranscombeN. R. (1993). Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24(1), 1–17.
38.
WindmeijerF. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25–51.
39.
YangY.ShiM.GoldfarbA. (2009). Estimating the value of brand alliances in professional team sports. Marketing Science, 28(6), 1095–1111.
