In 2007, Major League Soccer (MLS) changed its salary rules to allow teams to pay over the salary cap to sign high-priced talent. The first Designated Player was David Beckham. This study presents estimates of the influence of marquee players on MLS attendance using data from 2007 to 2012. The results indicate that few of the marquee signings drove higher attendance. Furthermore, these attendance effects tend to diminish over time. Specifically, only Beckham, Blanco, and Márquez generated excess fans in the games they played, with the largest effect in their first year. The results also give evidence of a superstar externality.
AdlerM. (1985). Stardom and talent. American Economic Review, 75, 208–212.
2.
BerriD. J.SchmidtM. B.BrookS. L. (2004). Stars at the gate: The impact of star power on NBA gate revenues. Journal of Sports Economics, 5, 33–50.
3.
BerriD. J.SchmidtM. B. (2006). On the road with the national basketball association’s superstar externality. Journal of Sports Economics, 7, 347–358.
4.
BorlandJ.MacdonaldR. (2003). Demand for sport. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19, 478–502.
5.
BrandesL.FranckE.NüeschS. (2008). Local heroes and superstars: An empirical analysis of star attraction in German soccer. Journal of Sports Economics, 9, 266–286.
6.
CoatesD.FrickB.JewellR. T. (2016). Superstar salaries and soccer success: The impact of designated players in major league soccer. Journal of Sports Economics. 17, 716–735.
ForrestD.SimmonsR. (2002). Outcome uncertainty and attendance demand in sport: The case of English soccer. The Statistician, 51, 229–241.
9.
FortR. (2006). Inelastic pricing at the gate? A survey. In WladimirA.SzymanskiS. (Eds.), Chapter 77 of Handbook on the Economics of Sport (pp. 700–708). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
10.
FranckE.NüeschS. (2012). Talent and/or popularity: What does it take to be a superstar?Economic Inquiry, 50, 202–216.
11.
FrickB.YoungH. L. (2011). Temporal variations in technical efficiency: Evidence from German soccer. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 35, 15–24.
12.
HalvorsenR.PalmquistR. (1980). The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review, 70, 474–475.
13.
HausmanJ. A.LeonardG. K. (1997). Superstars in the national basketball association: Economic value and policy. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 586–624.
14.
JewellR. T. (2015). Major league soccer in the USA. In GoddardJ.SloaneP. (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of professional football (pp. 351–367). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
15.
JewellR. T.MolinaD. J. (2005). An evaluation of the relationship between Hispanics and major league soccer. Journal of Sports Economics, 6, 160–177.
16.
KrautmannA.HadleyL. (2006). The product market in professional sports. In FizelJ. (Ed.), Chapter 9 of handbook of sports economics research (pp. 175–189). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
17.
KuetheT. H.MotamedM. (2010). Returns to stardom: Evidence from US major league soccer. Journal of Sports Economics, 11, 567–579.
18.
LawsonR. A.SheehanK.StephensonE. F. (2008). Vend it like Beckham: David Beckham’s effect on MLS ticket sales. International Journal of Sport Finance, 3, 189–195.
19.
LeFeuvreA. D.StephensonE. F.WalcottS. M. (2013). Football frenzy: The effect of the 2011 world cup on women’s professional soccer league attendance. Journal of Sports Economics, 14, 440–448.
20.
LuciferoC.SimmonsR. (2003). Superstar effects in sport: Evidence from Italian soccer. Journal of Sports Economics, 4, 35–55.
21.
MullinC. J.DunnL. F. (2002). Using baseball card prices to measure star quality and monopsony. Economic Inquiry, 40, 620–632.
