Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article presents evidence of the impact of overconfidence bias in asset prices drawn from a study based on data from tennis betting exchanges. A series of betting strategies in tournaments with a clear-cut favorite are shown to yield significant economic returns. The impact of overconfidence bias on betting odds increases with trading volume, media coverage, and levels of disagreement between overconfident and cumulative prospect theory bettors. Just as in traditional financial markets, arbitrage limits are shown to be a necessary condition for the impact of behavioral biases on prices.

Keywords

overconfidence betting exchanges anomalies behavioral finance arbitrage

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrikogiannopoulou

Papakonstantinou

(2013). Estimating heterogeneous risk preferences from a panel of real-world betting choices (Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper No. 13–53). Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2239194 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2239194

Arkes

(2011). Do gamblers correctly price momentum in NBA betting markets? Journal of Prediction Markets, 5, 31–50.

Ashiya

(2013). Lock! Risk free arbitrage in the Japanese racetrack betting market. Journal of Sports Economics. doi:10.1177/1527002513493630

Avery

Chevalier

(1999). Identifying investor sentiment from price paths: The case of football betting. Journal of Business, 72, 493–521.

Berg

J. E.

Rietz

T. A.

(2010). Longshots, overconfidence and efficiency on the Iowa electronic market. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1645062 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1645062

Borghesi

Paul

Weinbach

A. P.

(2009). Market frictions and overpriced favorites: Evidence from arena football. Applied Economics Letters, 16, 903–906.

Cooper

M. J.

Gutierrez

R. C.

Hameed

(2004). Market states and momentum. Journal of Finance, 59, 1345–1365.

Daniel

Hirshleifer

Subrahmanyam

(1998). Investor psychology and security market under and overreactions. Journal of Finance, 53, 1839–1885.

De Long

J. B.

Shleifer

Summers

L. H.

Waldmann

R. J.

(1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 703–738.

10.

Docherty

P. A.

Easton

S. A.

(2012). Market efficiency and continuous information arrival: Evidence from prediction markets. Applied Economics, 44, 2461–2471.

11.

Franck

E. P.

Verbeek

Nüesch

(2010). Prediction accuracy of different market structures—Bookmakers versus a betting exchange. International Journal of Forecasting, 26, 448–459.

12.

Franck

E. P.

Verbeek

Nüesch

(2013). Inter-market arbitrage in betting. Economica, 80, 300–325.

13.

Frazzini

(2006). The disposition effect and under-reaction to news. Journal of Finance, 61, 2017–2046.

14.

Hetherington

(2006). Betting against efficiency: Behavioral finance in an NFL gambling exchange (Working paper). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=881514

15.

Hong

Scheinkman

Xiong

(2006). Asset float and speculative bubbles. Journal of Finance, 61, 1073–1117.

16.

Hong

Stein

J. C.

(2007). Disagreement and the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 109–128.

17.

Hurley

McDonough

(1995). A note on the Hayek Hypothesis and the favourite-longshot bias in pari-mutuel betting. American Economic Review, 85, 949–955.

18.

Innocenti

Nannicini

Ricciuti

(2012). The importance of betting early (LABSI Working Paper No. 37/2012). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1999459

19.

Jullien

Salanié

(2008). Empirical evidence on the preferences of racetrack bettors. In Hausch

D. B.

Ziemba

W. T.

(Eds.), Efficiency of sport and lottery markets: Handbooks in finance series (pp. 27–47). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

20.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

21.

Koch

A. K.

Shing

H. F.

(2008). Bookmaker and pari-mutuel betting: Is a (reverse) favourite-longshot bias built-in? The Journal of Prediction Markets, 2, 29–52.

22.

Lahvicka

(2013). What causes the favourite-longshot bias? Further evidence from tennis. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2287335 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2287335

23.

Scheinkman

Xiong

(2003). Overconfidence and speculative bubbles. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 1183–1219.

24.

Shleifer

(2000). Inefficient markets: An introduction to behavioral finance (Clarendon Lectures in Economics). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

25.

Smith

M. A.

Paton

Williams

L. V.

(2006) “Market efficiency in person to person betting” Economica, 73, 673–689.

26.

Snowberg

Wolfers

(2010). Explaining the favorite-long shot bias: Is it risk-love or misperceptions? Journal of Political Economy, 118, 723–746.

27.

Tetlock

P. C.

(2004). How efficient are information markets? Evidence from an online exchange (Working Paper). University of Texas, Austin, TX.

28.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.

29.

Vergin

R. C.

(2001). Overreaction in the NFL point spread market. Applied Financial Economics, 11, 497–509.

30.

Vlastakis

Dotsis

Markellos

R. N.

(2009). How efficient is the European football betting market? Evidence from arbitrage and trading strategies. Journal of Forecasting, 28, 426–444.

31.

White

(1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.

32.

Williams

(2010). Momentum and sports betting. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1553150 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1553150

Behavioral Biases Never Walk Alone

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References