This article examines the labor supply of the top golfers on the American PGA tour from 1997 to 2003. Three hypotheses are proposed about the participation rates of these players to show that the purse alone is not enough to explain entry. The participation rate proves to be influenced by the characteristics of other tournaments and seasonal effects. The participation rate and the purse are shown to have an endogeneity problem. And players prefer to play golf tournaments that they have played in before and played well.
Ehrenberg, R., & Bognanno, M. (1990a). Do tournaments have incentive effects?Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1307-1324.
2.
Ehrenberg, R., & Bognanno, M. (1990b). The incentive effects of tournaments revisited: Evidence from the European PGA Tour. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, 74S-88S.
3.
Gilley, O. W., & Chopin, M. C. (2000). Professional golf: Labor or leisure. Managerial Finance, 26, 33-45.
4.
Golf stats: PGA Tour. (n.d.). Sports Illustrated and Golf Magazine. Retrieved May 2004 from http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/golfonline/golfstats/pgaSearch.html
5.
Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
Lynch, J. G., & Zax, J. S. (2000). The rewards to running: Prize structure and performance in professional road racing. Journal of Sports Economics, 1, 323-340.
7.
Maloney, M. T., & McCormick, R. E. (2000). The response of workers to wages in tournaments: Evidence from foot races. Journal of Sports Economics, 1, 99-123.
8.
Orszag, J. M. (1994). A new look at incentive effects and golf tournaments. Economic Letters, 46(1), 77-88.
9.
PGA Tour and Golf Web. (n.d.). Stats. Retrieved May 2004 from http://www.pgatour.com/stats/index.html
10.
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis. New York: Norton.
