Effectiveness of 2D-DSA and 3D-DSA in the Evaluation of Iliac Vein Stenosis: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Abstract

Purpose:

To compare the sensitivity of measuring iliac vein stenosis using two-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (2D-DSA) and three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (3D-DSA), with multidetector computed tomography venography (MDCTV) as the reference standard.

Methods:

Between January 2020 and January 2023, a total of 103 patients suffered from chronic venous insufficiency symptoms categorized as CEAP Level 3 or above were included from three centers. These patients were admitted to our hospital after abdominal vascular ultrasound and MDCTV positivity. During hospitalization, all patients underwent both 2D-DSA and 3D-DSA procedures simultaneously. Ensure double-blind and rigorous evaluation process when evaluating images. All patients were categorized into two groups based on the degree of CTV stenosis: Group A (50%–70%) and Group B (>70%). Considering the morphology of iliac vein compression, all patients were categorized into three groups: central, lateral, and partial obstruction. Subsequently, the effectiveness analysis was performed for each diagnostic method based on the aforementioned classification.

Results:

With MDCTV as the reference standard, in Group A, the sensitivity of 2D-DSA and 3D-DSA is 78.69% and 90.48%, respectively. In Group B, the sensitivity of 2D-DSA and 3D-DSA is 93.44% and 97.62%, respectively. In Group A, the accuracy of 3D-DSA is significantly higher than that of 2D-DSA (p = 0.019). However, there is no statistically significant difference in Group B (p = 0.360). The accuracy rates for central, lateral, and partial obstruction using 2D-DSA are, respectively, 77.55%, 69.70%, and 95.24%. The accuracy rates for central, lateral, and partial obstruction using 3D-DSA are, respectively, 93.88%, 93.94%, and 100%. In central group, the accuracy of 3D-DSA is significantly higher than that of 2D-DSA (p = 0.021). In lateral group, no significant difference was observed between the accuracy obtained by both methods (p = 0.011). Similarly, no significant difference was found in partial obstruction group (p = 1.000). During the angiography procedure using 3D-DSA, a significant reduction was observed in both contrast agent quantity and exposure time (p < 0.05) without any apparent effects on renal function.

Conclusion:

Regardless of the degree or type of iliac vein stenosis, 3D-DSA exhibits superior sensitivity compared to 2D-DSA for the diagnosis and evaluation of stenosis. Particularly in instances of noncentral stenosis, 3D-DSA outperforms 2D-DSA.

Clinical Impact

This will provide new insights for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS), significantly enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of IVCS. For clinicians, three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (3D-DSA)offers a more comprehensive and detailed assessment in clinical practice, leading to more precise diagnosis and treatment of the disease. The efficacy of two-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (2D-DSA) in treating IVCS is significantly compromised without the guidance from computed tomography venography (CTV). We consider that 3D-DSA can replace CTV in both diagnosis and treatment, providing a new diagnostic and therapeutic strategy.