Outcomes and Imaging Surveillance Adherence in Juxta-Renal Aortic Aneurysms Repairs: A VASQIP Retrospective Study

Abstract

Objective:

Fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) has demonstrated its value in the management of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JAAA), but data were largely derived from clinical trials and high-volume centers. Although routine imaging surveillance is recommended following endovascular interventions, little is known regarding follow-up compliance post-FEVAR. We examined the real-world treatment outcomes and adherence to the postoperative follow-up protocol after elective interventions for JAAA at Veteran Affairs (VA) health care facilities, the largest integrated health care system in the United State.

Methods:

This is a retrospective cohort study. We queried the Veteran Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database for elective FEVARs and juxtarenal open surgical repairs (j-OSR), then merged follow-up imaging and mortality information. Our primary endpoints were mortality following FEVAR and j-OSR, and adherence to surveillance guidelines. Secondary endpoints included short-term postoperative complications.

Results:

A total of 1110 veterans who underwent first-time JAAA repair between 2002 and 2019 (FEVAR, 26% [n=290]; j-OSR, 74% [n=820]) were included in the analysis. The number of j-OSR captured in the database gradually declined by 50%, from 62 interventions in 2002 to 28 in 2019, while FEVAR procedures quadrupled from 20 procedures in 2014 to 94 in 2019. The median follow-up was 3.99 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.73-4.87) for FEVAR patients, and 12.80 (12.31-13.70) for those that underwent jOSR. A significantly lower risk of 30-day mortality was observed following FEVAR compared to j-OSR (1% vs 5%, odds ratio [OR]: 5.03 [1.54-16.38]; p=0.003). At 5 years, FEVAR was linked with significantly higher mortality (41.5% vs 21%, p<0.001) after adjusting for confounders (aHR=2.10 [1.56-2.82], p<0.001). Of surviving patients, the follow-up imaging rate was 66.3% by 1-year post-FEVAR. Follow-up rate at 5 years was 7% post-FEVAR compared to 32% post j-OSR.

Conclusion:

Elective FEVAR is associated with lower perioperative mortality and morbidities compared to elective j-OSR for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. However, the perioperative survival benefits of FEVAR diminish over time, with its mortality surpassing that of j-OSR at longer follow-up periods. The compliance with post-FEVAR imaging surveillance is also low. Further research is warranted to develop strategies to improve adherence to imaging surveillance protocols.

Clinical Impact

This study provides real-world evidence on the outcomes and follow-up adherence following fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JAAA) in the Veterans Affairs health care system. With FEVAR’s increasing use, the findings highlight the need for improved surveillance protocols, as adherence to postoperative imaging declines significantly after the first year. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of long-term mortality despite FEVAR’s short-term benefits, urging better follow-up strategies that relay a survival benefit for patients.

Keywords

juxtarenal endovascular aneurysm repair FEVAR imaging mortality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

EVAR Trial Participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2005;365(9478):2179–2186. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66627-5.

Greenhalgh

Brown

Kwong

GPS

, et al Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2004;364(9437):843–848. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16979-1.

Prinssen

Verhoeven

ELG

Buth

, et al A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1607–1618. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa042002.

Bryce

Rogoff

Romanelli

, et al Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: vascular anatomy, device selection, procedure, and procedure-specific complications. Radiographics. 2015;35(2):593–615. doi:10.1148/rg.352140045.

Crawford

Beckett

Greer

MS.

Juxtarenal infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: special diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Ann Surg. 1986;203(6):661–670. doi:10.1097/00000658-198606000-00011.

Leurs

Kievit

Dagnelie

, et al Influence of infrarenal neck length on outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13(5):640–648. doi:10.1583/06-1882.1.

Medical Advisory Secretariat. Fenestrated endovascular grafts for the repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(4):1–51.

Browne

Hartley

Purchas

, et al A fenestrated covered suprarenal aortic stent. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;18(5):445–449. doi:10.1053/ejvs.1999.0924.

Suckow

Goodney

Columbo

, et al National trends in open surgical, endovascular and branched/fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare patients. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(6):1690–1697. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.046.

10.

Jones

Waduud

Walker

, et al Meta-analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years. BJS Open. 2019;3(5):572–584. doi:10.1002/bjs5.50178.

11.

Chaikof

Brewster

Dalman

, et al SVS practice guidelines for the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: executive summary. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(4):880–896. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.001.

12.

Roy

Millen

Jones

, et al Long-term follow-up of fenestrated endovascular repair for juxtarenal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2017;104(8):1020–1027. doi:10.1002/bjs.10524.

13.

Wanhainen

Van Herzeele

Bastos Goncalves

, et al Editor’s choice: European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024;67(2):192–331. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002.

14.

Grima

Karthikesalingam

Holt

, et al Multicentre post-EVAR surveillance evaluation study (EVAR-SCREEN). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(4):521–526. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.10.032.

15.

Schanzer

Messina

Ghosh

, et al Follow-up compliance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(1):16–22. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.006.

16.

Wolf

Ashouri

Succar

, et al Follow-up compliance in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at Veterans Affairs hospitals. J Vasc Surg. 2024;80(1):89–95. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.040.

17.

Greenberg

Sternbergh

3rd Makaroun

, et al Intermediate results of a United States multicenter trial of fenestrated endograft repair for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(4):730–737. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.05.051.

18.

de Souza

Oderich

Farber

, et al Editor’s choice: comparison of renal outcomes in patients treated by Zenith® fenestrated and Zenith® abdominal aortic aneurysm stent grafts in US Prospective Pivotal Trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(5):648–655. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.02.005.

19.

Massarweh

Kaji

Itani

KMF

. Practical guide to surgical data sets: Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP). JAMA Surg. 2018;153(8):768–769. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0504.

20.

Rosenfeld

Macsata

Lala

, et al Open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in the elderly is not associated with increased thirty-day mortality compared with fenestrated endovascular grafting. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(4):1139–1147. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.121.

21.

Tinelli

Sica

Sobocinski

, et al Long-term propensity-matched comparison of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair and open surgical repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms [published online ahead of print March 28, 2023]. J Endovasc Ther off J Int Soc Endovasc Spec. doi:10.1177/15266028231162256.

22.

Michel

Becquemin

Clément

, et al Editor’s choice: thirty day outcomes and costs of fenestrated and branched stent grafts versus open repair for complex aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(2):189–196. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.04.012.

23.

Doonan

Girsowicz

Dubois

, et al A systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair demonstrates lower perioperative mortality compared with open repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(6):2054–2064. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.464.

24.

Rastogi

Varkevisser

RRB

Patel

, et al Age stratified mid-term survival following endovascular versus open repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg: Off J Eur Soc Vasc Surg. 2024;67:408-415. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.08.037.

25.

Antoniou

Juszczak

Antoniou

, et al Editor’s choice: fenestrated or branched endovascular versus open repair for complex aortic aneurysms: meta-analysis of time to event propensity score matched data. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg: Off J Eur Soc Vasc Surg. 2021;61(2):228–237. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.10.010.

26.

Wanhainen

Verzini

Van Herzeele

, et al Editor’s choice: European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(1):8–93. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020.

27.

O’Donnell

TFX

Boitano

Deery

, et al Open versus fenestrated endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Surg. 2020;271(5):969–977. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003094.

28.

Rao

Lane

TRA

Franklin

, et al Open repair versus fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair of juxtarenal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(1):242–255. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.068.

29.

Zlatanovic

Jovanovic

Tripodi

, et al Chimney vs fenestrated endovascular vs open repair for juxta/pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: systematic review and network meta-analysis of the medium-term results. J Clin Med. 2022;11(22):6779. doi:10.3390/jcm11226779.

30.

Deery

Lancaster

Gubala

, et al Early experience with fenestrated endovascular compared to open repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms in a high-volume open aortic center. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;48:151–158. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2017.10.017.

31.

Garg

Baker

Mell

MW.

Adherence to postoperative surveillance guidelines after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair among Medicare beneficiaries. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(1):23–27. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.003.

32.

Kret

Azarbal

Mitchell

, et al Compliance with long-term surveillance recommendations following endovascular aneurysm repair or type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(1):25–31. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.046.