The Role of Location,Length,and Thickness of the Intimal Flap in the Propagation of Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Based on Ex Vivo Porcine Aorta Models

Abstract

Purpose:

To explore the role of location, length, and thickness of the intimal flap in the propagation of Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) based on ex vivo porcine aorta models based on ex vivo porcine aorta models.

Materials and Methods:

The porcine aortas were harvested and randomly divided into 6 groups to create various TBAD aortic models. We constructed intimal flaps for different locations (group A [entry tear on outer curvature] and group B [entry tear on inner curvature]), lengths (group C [long] and group D [short]), and thicknesses (group E [thick] and group F [thin]). For the ex vivo perfusion experiments conducted on model aortas, an experimental circulation loop (ECL) was employed. The pressure in false lumen (FL) was constantly monitored. A comparison was made between the morphological data collected before and after the experiment to quantify the changes in the FL after the experiment.

Results:

Compared the results with group B, the mean peak pressures of the FL in group A were lower (106.87±15.55 vs. 124.01±22.75 mm Hg, p=0.028). The mean axial propagation length in group A was shown to be shorter than that of group B (88.14±33.38 vs. 197.43±41.65 mm, p<0.001). The mean peak pressure was higher in group C than in group D (144.04±19.37 vs. 92.51±26.70 mm Hg, p<0.001). The mean peak pressure of group E was higher than that of group F (160.83±32.83 vs. 109.33±15.62 mm Hg, p<0.001), as was the mean axial propagation length of group E (143.11±39.73 vs. 100.45±35.44 mm, p=0.021). According to the results of multivariable linear regression, axial propagation length=45.873–0.703×length of initial FL+0.863× peak pressure (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

There was a relationship between FL propagation and the location, length, and thickness of the intimal flap. The axial propagation length was related to the length of the intimal flap and the peak pressure of propagation. It may be helpful to evaluate the risk of propagation in patients with TBAD.

Clinical Impact

This study found that the locations, lengths, and thickness of the intimal flap significantly contributed to propagation pressure of FL. Using dissection flap characteristics, a physician can predict FL development in a patient and formulate a treatment plan.The purpose was to investigate the relationship between the dissection flap characteristics (location, length, and thickness) and the propagation of the FL, which is not clear at present. This study employed porcine models to create an experimental circulation loop. The perfusion experiment was conducted using a FL without distal re-entry and a non-pulsating flow.

Keywords

aortic dissection experimental circulation loop intimal flap porcine aorta model propagation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

van Bogerijen

Tolenaar

Rampoldi

, et al. Predictors of aortic growth in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(4):1134–1143.

Brunet

Pierrat

Badel

A parametric study on factors influencing the onset and propagation of aortic dissection using the extended finite element method. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021;68(10):2918–2929.

Robicsek

Thubrikar

MJ.

Hemodynamic considerations regarding the mechanism and prevention of aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58(4):1247–1253.

Chitsaz

Azadani

Matthews

, et al. Hemodynamic determinants of aortic dissection propagation by 2D computational modeling: implications for endovascular stent-grafting. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2012;53(5):631–640.

Carson

Roach

MR.

The strength of the aortic media and its role in the propagation of aortic dissection. J Biomech. 1990;23(6):579–588.

Tam

Sapp

Roach

MR.

The effect of tear depth on the propagation of aortic dissections in isolated porcine thoracic aorta. J Biomech. 1998;31(7):673–676.

Ban

Cavinato

Humphrey

JD.

Differential propensity of dissection along the aorta. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2021;20(3):895–907.

Girish

Padala

Kalra

, et al. The impact of intimal tear location and partial false lumen thrombosis in acute type B aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(6):1925–1932.

Marconi

Lanzarone

De Beaufort

, et al. A novel insight into the role of entry tears in type B aortic dissection: pressure measurements in an in vitro model. Int J Artif Organs. 2017;40(10):563–574.

10.

Cheng

Riga

Chan

, et al. Initial findings and potential applicability of computational simulation of the aorta in acute type B dissection. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(suppl 2):35S–43S.

11.

Peelukhana

Wang

Berwick

, et al. Role of pulse pressure and geometry of primary entry tear in acute type B dissection propagation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45(3):592–603.

12.

Liang

Jia

Dong

, et al. Hemodynamic study of Stanford type B aortic dissection based on Ex vivo porcine aorta models. J Endovasc Ther. 2023;30(3):441–448.

13.

Razali

Wah

YB.

Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. J Stat Model Anal. 2011;2(1):21–33.

14.

Dingemans

Jansen

Becker

AE.

Ultrastructure of the normal human aortic media. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1981;392(2):199–216.

15.

Okuno

Yamaguchi

Okada

, et al. Endovascular creation of aortic dissection in a swine model with technical considerations. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(5):1410–1418.

16.

Georges

Couture

Voisine

Assessment of large animal vascular dimensions for intra-aortic device research and development: a systematic review. Innovations (Phila). 2023;18(2):144–151.

17.

Rong

, et al. The 301 classification: a proposed modification to the Stanford type B aortic dissection classification for thoracic endovascular aortic repair prognostication. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(7):1329–1341.

18.

Tsai

Schlicht

Khanafer

, et al. Tear size and location impacts false lumen pressure in an ex vivo model of chronic type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(4):844–851.

19.

Chang

Liu

Liou

, et al. The role of false lumen size in prediction of in-hospital complications after acute type B aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(14):1170–1176.

20.

Kim

Kwon

, et al. Large false lumen area is a predictor of failed false lumen volume reduction after stent-graft repair in type B aortic dissection. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21(5):697–706.

21.

Kim

Lee

, et al. Role of false lumen area ratio in late aortic events after acute type I aortic dissection repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;114(6):2217–2224.

22.

Ban

Cavinato

Humphrey

JD.

Critical pressure of intramural delamination in aortic dissection. Ann Biomed Eng. 2022;50(2):183–194.

23.

Guo

Dong

Pirola

, et al. Dissection level within aortic wall layers is associated with propagation of type B aortic dissection: a swine model study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58(3):415–425.

24.

Peterss

Mansour

Ross

, et al. Changing pathology of the thoracic aorta from acute to chronic dissection: literature review and insights. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(10):1054–1065.

25.

Wang

Hill

Roper

, et al. Modelling peeling- and pressure-driven propagation of arterial dissection. J Eng Math. 2018;109(1):227–238.

26.

Witter

Tonar

Schöpper

How many layers has the adventitia?—Structure of the arterial tunica externa revisited. Anat Histol Embryol. 2017;46(2):110–120.

27.

Tonar

Tomášek

Loskot

, et al. Vasa vasorum in the tunica media and tunica adventitia of the porcine aorta. Ann Anat. 2016;205:22–36.