Feasibility and Clinical Value of Intraprocedural Doppler Ultrasonography Blood Flow Parameters During Peripheral Endovascular Procedures for Limb Salvage: A Pilot Study

Abstract

Purpose:

To investigate whether Doppler ultrasound (DUS) blood flow parameters could serve as quantifiable functional endpoints of peripheral endovascular arterial procedures for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), influencing wound healing.

Methods:

This is a prospective single-center study investigating intraprocedural DUS parameters (pulsatility index [PI] and pedal acceleration time [PAT]) in quantifying immediate hemodynamic alterations in consecutive CLTI patients with wound, ischemia, and foot infection wound class ≥1 undergoing endovascular interventions. Primary endpoints were feasibility of preendovascular and postendovascular treatment measurements of PI/PAT, quantification of immediate PI/PAT modifications of the posterior and anterior foot circulation following revascularization, the correlation between PI and PAT, and 6-month complete wound healing. Secondary endpoints included the 6-month limb salvage (no major amputation) and complete and partial wound healing rates.

Results:

A total of 28 patients (75.0% male) were enrolled, and 68 vessels were treated. The overall mean PAT values significantly decreased from 154.15±70.35 ms preprocedural to 107.21±49.6 ms postprocedural (p<0.01), and the mean PI values significantly increased from 0.93±0.99 to 1.92±1.96 (p<0.01). Postprocedural PAT at the anterior tibial (r²=0.804; p=0.346) and the posterior tibial arteries (r²=0.784; p=0.322) had a strong correlation and postprocedural PI at the anterior tibial (r²=0.704; p=0.301) and the posterior tibial arteries (r²=0.707; p=0.369) had a good correlation with 6-month complete wound healing. The 6-month complete and partial wound healing rates were 38.1% and 47.6%, respectively. Limb salvage was 96.4% and 92.4% at 6 and 12 months of follow-up, respectively.

Conclusions:

Pedal acceleration time and PI accurately detected immediate hemodynamic changes of foot perfusion following revascularization and could serve as prognostic factors of wound healing in patients with CLTI.

Clinical Impact

Intraprocedural measurement of simple Doppler ultrasound blood flow parameters, Pulsatility Index (PI) and Pedal Acceleration Time (PAT), accurately detected immediate hemodynamic changes of foot perfusion following endovascular revascularization and could therefore serve as intraprocedural prognostic factors of wound healing in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. This is the first time that PI has been proposed as a hemodynamic index of successful angioplasty outcome. The optimization of intraprocedural PAT and PI could be used to guide angioplasty and predict clinical success.

Keywords

peripheral arterial procedures endovascular treatment chronic limb-threatening ischemia pulsatility index pedal acceleration time wound healing Doppler ultrasound

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aboyans

Ricco

Bartelink

MLEL

, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:763–821.

Hinchliffe

Forsythe

Apelqvist

, et al. International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF). Guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36(suppl 1):e3276.

Liang

HL.

Doppler flow measurement of lower extremity arteries adjusted by pulsatility index. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(1):10–17.

Arkoudis

Katsanos

Inchingolo

, et al. Quantifying tissue perfusion after peripheral endovascular procedures: novel tissue perfusion endpoints to improve outcomes. World J Cardiol. 2021;13(9):381–398.

Jens

Marquering

Koelemay

, et al. Perfusion angiography of the foot in patients with critical limb ischemia: description of the technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(1):201–205.

Kagadis

Tsantis

Gatos

, et al. 2D perfusion DSA with an open-source, semi-automated, color-coded software for the quantification of foot perfusion following infrapopliteal angioplasty: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol Exp. 2020;4(1):47.

Huici-Sanchez

Martí-Mestre

Martinez-Rico

, et al. Usefulness of ultrasound-guided tibio-pedal access in patients with critical limb ischemia. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2022;100(7):431–436.

Spiliopoulos

Giannikouris

Katsanos

, et al. VOLume flow assistance for optimizing outcomes of dysfunctional autologous arteriovenous fistula angioplasty: the VOLA pilot study. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(1):368–376.

Sultan

Hynes

Five-year Irish trial of CLI patients with TASC II type C/D lesions undergoing subintimal angioplasty or bypass surgery based on plaque echolucency. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16(3):270–283.

10.

Stergiopulos

Young

Rogge

TR.

Computer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and aortic stenoses. J Biomech. 1992;25(12):1477–1488.

11.

Corbin

Young

Morrison

, et al. Blood flow in the foot, polyneuropathy and foot ulceration in diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1987;30(7):468–473.

12.

Sommerset

Karmy-Jones

Dally

, et al. Plantar acceleration time: a novel technique to evaluate arterial flow to the foot. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;60:308–314.

13.

Trihan

Mahé

Croquette

, et al. Accuracy of acceleration time of distal arteries to diagnose severe peripheral arterial disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;8:744354.

14.

Teso

Sommerset

Dally

, et al. Pedal acceleration time (PAT): a novel predictor of limb salvage. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021;75:189–193.

15.

Gerhard-Herman

Gornik

Barrett

, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2017;135(12):e726–e779.

16.

Hinchliffe

Forsythe

Apelqvist

, et al. Guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36(suppl 1):e3276.

17.

Katsanos

Tepe

Tsetis

, et al. Standards of practice for superficial femoral and popliteal artery angioplasty and stenting. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37(3):592–603.

18.

Bailey

Beckman

Dao

, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI/SIR/SVM 2018 appropriate use criteria for peripheral artery intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology appropriate use criteria task force, American Heart Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, and Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(2):214–237.

19.

Rocha-Singh

Zeller

Jaff

MR.

Peripheral arterial calcification: prevalence, mechanism, detection, and clinical implications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(6):E212–E220.

20.

Bardelli

Veglio

Arosio

, et al. New intrarenal echo-Doppler velocimetric indices for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Kidney Int. 2006;69(3):580–587.

21.

Forsythe

Apelqvist

Boyko

, et al. Effectiveness of revascularisation of the ulcerated foot in patients with diabetes and peripheral artery disease: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36(suppl 1):e3279.

22.

De Donato

Benedetto

Stilo

, et al. Evaluation of clinical outcomes after revascularization in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia: results from a prospective national cohort study (RIVALUTANDO). Angiology. 2021;72(5):480–489.

23.

Trihan

Mahé

Laroche

, et al. Arterial blood-flow acceleration time on Doppler ultrasound waveforms: what are we talking about? J Clin Med. 2023;12(3):1097.

24.

Buschmann

Brix

, et al. A novel computer-aided diagnostic approach for detecting peripheral arterial disease in patients with diabetes. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0199374.