Mortality and Major Adverse Events Improve With Increased Institutional Experience for Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair

Abstract

Objective:

Our objective was to evaluate temporal trends in outcomes at our institution in the context a more heterogenous application of fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR).

Methods:

Patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedure details, and postoperative outcomes were collected for consecutive patients undergoing F/BEVAR between 2002 and February 2019 at our institution. Outcomes were compared between tertile 1 (T1, 2002–2010, n=47), T2 (2011–2014, n=47), and T3 (2015-February 2019, n=47).

Results:

We included 141 patients (74.8 ± 8.1 years, 83% male) with a mean follow-up of 28.0 ± 31.6 months. Proportion of patients with hypertension (63.8% T1, 85.1% T3, p=0.009), diabetes (6.4% T1, 29.7% T3, p=0.005), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; 27.6% T1, 42.5% T3, p=0.07), and history of stroke (4.2% T1, 17% T3, p=0.07) increased over time. Aneurysm diameter (65.3±11.4mm) and extent (56.0% juxtarenal/pararenal, 22.0% type IV, 22.0% type I-III) did not differ between groups. Custom made devices were implanted in 96.5% of cases with 3.4 ± 0.7 vessels reimplanted/case. There was a trend toward increased history of aortic surgery (p=0.008) and less custom made devices (p=0.007) in T3.

Total procedure time (383.5±119.2 minutes T1, 316.2±88.4 T3, p=0.02), contrast volume (222.8±109.1 mL T1, 139.2±62.7ml T3, p<0.0001), and estimated blood loss (601.3±458.1 mL T1, 413.3±317.7 mL T3, p=0.02) decreased over time. Overall 30-day mortality was 6.3%, 10.6%-T1, 6.3%-T2, and 2.1%-T3 (p=0.09). We noted significant improvement in survival over time; 1- and 3-year survival was 79% and 56%, 89% and 83%, and 90% and 90%, for T1, T2, and T3, respectively (p=0.007). In all, 467 of 480 target vessels were revascularized (97.3% success). Reintervention rate (30-day: 13.5%, follow-up: 34.7%) and reintervention free survival was not significantly different between groups. Any major adverse event (MAE) occurred in 36.9% of patients overall with a significant decrease from early (51.1%), mid (34.9%), to late in our experience (25.5%, p=0.03). In multivariate analyses, increasing institutional experience (T3), procedure time, age, and sex were independent predictors of major adverse events.

Conclusion:

We have shown improvement in F/BEVAR outcomes including mortality, MAEs, and procedural metrics with increasing institutional experience. We postulate that a combination of advancements in technique, surgical team and postoperative care experience, graft design and stent technologies, and patient selection contributed to improvement in outcomes.

Keywords

complex aortic aneurysm thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Salzler

Meltzer

Mao

, et al. Characterizing the evolution of perioperative outcomes and costs of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(5):1134–1139. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.06.138.

Doonan

Girsowicz

Dubois

, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair demonstrates lower perioperative mortality compared with open repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(6):2054–2064. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.464.

Rocha

Friedrich

Elbatarny

, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of early outcomes after endovascular versus open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(6):1936–1945.e5. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.147.

Starnes

Caps

Arthurs

, et al. Evaluation of the learning curve for fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(5):1219–1227. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.049.

Schneider

Agrusa

Ellozy

, et al. Analysis of the learning curve and patient outcomes of endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated and branched stent grafts: prospective, nonrandomized, single-center physician-sponsored investigational device exemption clinical study. Ann Surg. 2018;268(4):640–649. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002960.

Mirza

Tenorio

Kärkkäinen

, et al. Learning curve of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair for pararenal and thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(2):423–434.

Sveinsson

Sobocinski

Resch

, et al. Early versus late experience in fenestrated endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(4):895–901. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.007.

Simons

Shue

Flahive

, et al. Trends in use of the only food and drug administration-approved commercially available fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair device in the united states. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(5):1260–1269. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.101.

Tsai

Conrad

Patel

, et al. Durability of open repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:2–7. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.1012.1085.

10.

Coselli

LeMaire

Preventza

, et al. Outcomes of 3309 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151(5):1323–1337. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.12.050.

11.

Eagleton

Follansbee

Wolski

, et al. Fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair outcomes for type II and III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(4):930–942. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.095.

12.

Oderich

Ribeiro

Reis de Souza

, et al. Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated and branched endografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:S32-S41.e37. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.1010.1008.

13.

Schanzer

Simons

Flahive

, et al. Outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:687–694. doi: 610.1016/j.jvs.2016.1012.1111.

14.

Motta

Crowner

Kalbaugh

, et al. Outcomes and complications after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(1):15–22. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.052.

15.

Mastracci

Eagleton

Kuramochi

, et al. Twelve-year results of fenestrated endografts for juxtarenal and group iv thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(2):355–364. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.09.068.

16.

Katsargyris

Oikonomou

Kouvelos

, et al. Comparison of outcomes for double fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus triple or quadruple fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair in the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:29–36. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.1011.1043.

17.

Lioupis

Corriveau

MacKenzie

, et al. Treatment of aortic arch aneurysms with a modular transfemoral multibranched stent graft: initial experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43:525–532. doi:510.1016/j.ejvs.2012.1001.1031.

18.

Dimick

Cowan

Jr Stanley

, et al. Surgeon specialty and provider volumes are related to outcome of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:739–744. doi:710.1016/s0741-5214(1003)00470-00471.

19.

Brescia

Patel

Likosky

, et al. Volume-outcome relationships in surgical and endovascular repair of aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108(5):1299–1306. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.047.

20.

O’Donnell

TFX

Boitano

Deery

, et al. Hospital volume matters: the volume-outcome relationship in open juxtarenal aaa repair. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):184–190. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002873.

21.

Geiger

Aquina

Esce

, et al. 1-year patient survival correlates with surgeon volume following elective open abdominal aortic surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2020;19:31242–31248.

22.

Tenorio

Oderich

Sandri

, et al. Prospective nonrandomized study to evaluate cone beam computed tomography for technical assessment of standard and complex endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(6):1982–1993. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.080.

23.

Tenorio

Oderich

Sandri

, et al. Impact of onlay fusion and cone beam computed tomography on radiation exposure and technical assessment of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(4):1045–1058. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.040.

24.

Biasi

Ali

Ratnam

, et al. Intra-operative dynact improves technical success of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(2):288–295. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.013.