ChaikofELBrewsterDCDalmanRLet al. SVS practice guidelines for the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: executive summary. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:880–896.
2.
ChaikofELDalmanRLEskandariMKet al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:2–77.e2.
3.
de MikSMLGeraedtsACMUbbinkDTet al. Effect of imaging surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair on reinterventions and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2019;26:531–541.
4.
PatelRSweetingMJPowellJTet al, for the EVAR Trial Investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial (EVAR trial 1): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2366–2374.
5.
GrimaMJBoufiMLawMet al. Editor’s choice. The implications of non-compliance to endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55:492–502.
EVAR Trial Participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:2187–2192.
8.
DiasNVRivaLIvancevKet al. Is there a benefit of frequent CT follow-up after EVAR?Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:425–430.
9.
NordonIMKarthikesalingamAHinchliffeRJet al. Secondary interventions following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and the enduring value of graft surveillance. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39:547–554.
10.
ChisciESetacciFIacoponiFet al. Surveillance imaging modality does not affect detection rate of asymptomatic secondary interventions following EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43:276–281.
11.
KarthikesalingamAHoltPJHinchliffeRJet al. Risk of reintervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2010;97:657–663.
