Purpose: To analyze the results of isolated left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using carotid-subclavian bypass (CSbp) or chimney grafts (CGs). Methods: A retrospective multicenter, observational study identified 73 patients (mean age 68±13 years, range 22–87; 56 men) with acute or chronic thoracic aortic lesions who underwent TEVAR with isolated LSA revascularization using either CSbp (n=42) or CGs (n=31) from January 2010 and February 2017. Primary endpoints were TEVAR-related mortality, postoperative stroke, freedom from type Ia endoleak, and LSA patency. Results: Primary technical success was achieved in all cases. Early TEVAR-related mortality was 4.2% (CSbp 2% vs CG 6%, p=0.571). Two (3%) patients had major ischemic strokes (one in each group). Mean follow-up was 24±21 months (range 1–72; median 15). Estimated freedom from TEVAR-related mortality was 93%±3% (95% CI 84.3% to 97.0%) at 12 and 36 months, with no significant difference between CSbp and CG (p=0.258). Aortic reintervention did not differ between the groups (CSbp 5% vs CG 6%, p=0.356); nor did freedom from type Ia endoleak (CSbp 98% vs CG 87%, p=0.134). Gutter-related endoleaks occurred in 4 (13%) CG patients, but none of the patients experienced sac enlargement or the need for reintervention and none died. Primary patency of the LSA was 100% for the entire group during the observation period. Conclusion: In our experience, LSA revascularization proved most satisfactory and equally effective with both the CSbp and CG techniques, without discernible differences at midterm follow-up.
ChungJKasirajanKVeeraswamyRKet al. Left subclavian artery coverage during thoracic endovascular aortic repair and risk of perioperative stroke or death. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:979–984.
2.
MaldonadoTSDexterDRockmanCBet al. Left subclavian artery coverage during thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair does not mandate revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:116–124.
3.
PattersonBOHoltPJNienaberCet al. Management of the left subclavian artery and neurologic complications after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:1491–1497.
4.
WilsonJEGaliñanesELHuPet al. Routine revascularization is unnecessary in the majority of patients requiring zone II coverage during thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a longitudinal outcomes study using United States Medicare population data. Vascular. 2014;22:239–245.
5.
HajibandehSHajibandehSAntoniouSAet al. Meta-analysis of left subclavian artery coverage with and without revascularization in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:634–441.
6.
SobocinskiJPattersonBOKarthikesalingamAet al. The effect of left subclavian artery coverage in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:810–817.
7.
WaterfordSDChouDBombienRet al. Left subclavian arterial coverage and stroke during thoracic aortic endografting: a systematic review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:381–389.
8.
von AllmenRSGahlBPowellJT.Incidence of stroke following thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending aortic aneurysm: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53:176–184.
9.
MatsumuraJSLeeWAMitchellRSet al; Society for Vascular Surgery. The Society for Vascular Surgery Practice Guidelines: management of the left subclavian artery with thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:1155–1118.
10.
GrabenwögerMAlfonsoFBachetJet al; European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS); European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for the treatment of aortic diseases: a position statement from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:17–24.
11.
RiambauVBöcklerDBrunkwallJet al. management of descending thoracic aorta diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53:4–52.
12.
WangLZhouXGuoDet al. A new adjustable puncture device for in situ fenestration during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25:474–479.
13.
AlsafiABicknellCDRudarakanchanaNet al. Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms with a short proximal landing zone using scalloped endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:1499–1506.
14.
XueYSunLZhengJet al. The chimney technique for preserving the left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:623–629.
15.
BradshawRJAhanchiSSPowellOet al. Left subclavian artery revascularization in zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair is associated with lower stroke risk across all aortic diseases. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65:1270–1279.
16.
HnathJCMehtaMTaggertJBet al. Strategies to improve spinal cord ischemia in endovascular thoracic aortic repair: Outcomes of a prospective cerebrospinal fluid drainage protocol. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:836–840.
17.
EtzCDWeigangEHartertMet al. Contemporary spinal cord protection during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery and endovascular aortic repair: a position paper of the vascular domain of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:943–957.
18.
ClarckRE.Definitions of terms of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thor Surg. 1994;58:271–273.
19.
NashefSARoquesFSharplesLDet al. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:734–744.
20.
FillingerMFGreenbergRKMcKinseyJFet al; Society for Vascular Surgery Ad Hoc Committee on TEVAR Reporting Standards. Reporting standards for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:1022–1033.
21.
von AllmenRSWeissSTevaearaiHTet al. Completeness of follow-up determines validity of study findings: results of a prospective repeated measures cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e014081.
22.
TimaranCHMcKinseyJFSchneiderPAet al. Reporting standards for carotid interventions from the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:1679–1695.
23.
LindbladBBin JabrAHolstJet al. Chimney grafts in aortic stent grafting: hazardous or useful technique? Systematic review of current data. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50:722–731.
24.
HickeyGLDunningJSeifertBet al; EJCTS and ICVTS Editorial Committees. Statistical and data reporting guidelines for the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and the Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;48:180–193.
25.
MadenciALOzakiCKBelkinMet al. Carotid-subclavian bypass and subclavian-carotid transposition in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair era. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:1275–1282.
26.
SaoutiNHindoriVMorshuisWJet al. Left subclavian artery revascularization as part of thoracic stent grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:120–125.
27.
HogendoornWSchlösserFJMollFLet al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the chimney graft technique. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:502–511.
28.
ZhuYGuoWLiuXet al. The single-centre experience of the supra-arch chimney technique in endovascular repair of type B aortic dissections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45:633–638.
29.
KatoMKagayaHKuboYet al. Real chimney technique for total debranching of supra-aortic trunks. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:542–545.
30.
BosiersMJDonasKPMangialardiNet al. European multicenter registry for the performance of the chimney/snorkel technique in the treatment of aortic arch pathologic conditions. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:2224–2230.
31.
HuangCTangHQiaoTet al. Early results of chimney technique for type B aortic dissections extending to the aortic arch. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39:28–35.
32.
Bin JabrALindbladBDiasNet al. Efficacy and durability of the chimney graft technique in urgent and complex thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:886–894.
33.
ZamorKCEskandariMKRodriguezHEet al. Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair and subclavian revascularization techniques. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:93–100.
34.
BabaTOhkiTKanaokaYet al. Clinical outcomes of left subclavian artery coverage on morbidity and mortality during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for distal arch aneurysms. World J Surg. 2015;39:2812–2822.
35.
GirardiLNKriegerKHMackCAet al. Does cross-clamping the arch increase the risk of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair?Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:133–137.
36.
KawaharadaNMorishitaKFukadaJet al. Stroke in surgery of the arteriosclerotic descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: influence of cross-clamping technique of the aorta. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27:622–625.
37.
RicottaJJ2nd. Endoleak management and postoperative surveillance following endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(4 suppl):91S–99S.
38.
DesaiNDPochettinoASzetoWYet al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair: evolution of therapy, patterns of use, and results in a 10-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:587–594.
39.
GeisbüschPKotelisDHyhlik-DürrAet al. Endografting in the aortic arch—does the proximal landing zone influence outcome?Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39:693–699.
40.
MoulakakisKGMylonasSNDalainasIet al. The chimney-graft technique for preserving supra-aortic branches: a review. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:339–346.
BieblMHakaimAGOldenburgWAet al. Does chronic oral anticoagulation with warfarin affect durability of endovascular aortic aneurysm exclusion in a midterm follow-up?J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12:58–65.
43.
MestresGUribeJPGarcía-MadridCet al. The best conditions for parallel stenting during EVAR: an in vitro study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:468–473.
44.
SchwierzEKolvenbachRRYoshidaRet al. Experience with the sandwich technique in endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:1562–1569.
45.
PecoraroFVeithFJPuippeGet al. Mid- and longer-term follow up of chimney and/or periscope grafts and risk factors for failure. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51:664–673.
46.
FazziniSRoncheySOrricoMet al. “Over-SIRIX”: A new method for sizing aortic endografts in combination with the chimney grafts: early experience with aortic arch disease. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;46:285–298.
47.
PatelHJDakeMDBavariaJEet al. Branched endovascular therapy of the distal aortic arch: preliminary results of the feasibility multicenter trial of the Gore Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1190–1198.
48.
CanaudLOzdemirBAPattersonBOet al. Retrograde aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Ann Surg. 2014;260:389–395.
49.
NautaFJHKimJBPatelHJet al. Early outcomes of acute retrograde dissection from the international registry of acute aortic dissection. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29:150–159.
50.
BrunkwallJKasprzakPVerhoevenEet al; ADSORB Trialists. Endovascular repair of acute uncomplicated aortic type B dissection promotes aortic remodelling: 1 year results of the ADSORB trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:285–291.
51.
LombardiJVCambriaRPNienaberCAet al; STABLE investigators. Aortic remodeling after endovascular treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection with the use of a composite device design. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:1544–1554.
52.
BöcklerDBrunkwallJTaylorPRet al; CTAG registry investigators. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair of aortic arch pathologies with the conformable thoracic aortic graft: early and 2 year results from a European multicentre registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51:791–800.
53.
ContrellaBNSabriSSTracciMCet al. Outcomes of coverage of the left subclavian artery during endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26:1609–1614.
