Gatekeeping is an integral but sometimes difficult part of the research process, particularly for researchers who want to conduct research in indigenous cultures. The author discusses how she gained access into the Muscogee (Creek) culture to conduct several research studies. Establishing trusting, long-term relationships through social networking, acquiring specific permissions at various levels, selecting key informants, presenting oneself appropriately, and showing respect for cultural mores are essential aspects of being granted entry by gatekeepers.
Agar, M.H.1980. The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Caballero, B.2002. Ethical issues for collaborative research in developing countries. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition76:771-20.
3.
Collings, P.2009. Participant observation and phased assertion as research strategies in the Canadian Arctic. Field Methods21:33-153.
4.
DeWalt, K.M., and B.R. DeWalt .1998. Participant observation. In Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology, ed. H. R. Bernard, 259-300. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
5.
DeWalt, K.M., and B.R. DeWalt .2002. Participant observation: A guide for field-workers. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
6.
Fixico, D.L.1996. Ethics and responsibilities in writing American Indian history. American Indian Quarterly, Special Issue: Writing about American Indians20:29-39.
7.
Fixico, D.L.1998. Ethics and responsibilities in writing American Indian history. In Natives and academics: Researching and writing about American Indians, ed. D. A. Mihesuah , 84-99. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
8.
Green, R.1988. The tribe called Wannabe: Playing Indian in America and Europe. Folklore99:30-55.
9.
Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson.1995. Ethnography: Principles in practice . 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
10.
Handwerker, W.P.2001. Quick ethnography. Walnut Creek, CA : AltaMira.
11.
Hansen, S.A., and J. Van Fleet .2003. Traditional knowledge and intellectual property: A handbook on issues and options for traditional knowledge holders. Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science. http://shr.aaas.org/tek/handbook/ (accessed November 9, 2006).
12.
Harrington, B.2003. The social psychology of access in ethnographic research . Journal of Contemporary Ethnography32:592-625.
13.
Kawulich, B.B.1998. Muscogee (Creek) women’s perceptions of work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University.
14.
Kawulich, B.B.2001. Realities of fieldwork. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation # ED461674.
15.
Kawulich, B.B.2004. Muscogee women’s identity development. In The family experience: A reader in cultural diversity. 4th ed., ed. M. Hutter, 83-93. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
16.
Kawulich, B.B.2005. Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (online journal) , 6. http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-05/05-2-43-e.htm (accessed November 6, 2006).
17.
Kawulich, B.B.2008. Giving back to the community through leadership. Advancing Women in Leadership Archives28. http://advancingwomen.com/awl/awl_wordpress/ (accessed January 5, 2009).
18.
Kievit, J. A., ed. 2003. A discussion of scholarly responsibilities to indigenous communities. American Indian Quarterly27:3-45.
19.
Kottak, C.P.1987. Cultural anthropology. 4th ed. New York: Random House.
20.
Lassiter, L.E.2001. From ‘‘Reading over the Shoulders of Natives’’ to ‘‘Reading Alongside Natives.’’ Literally: Toward a collaborative and reciprocal ethnography. Journal of Anthropological Research57:137-49.
21.
Lassiter, L.E.2005. Collaborative ethnography and public anthropology. Current Anthropology46:83-106.
22.
Lassiter, L.E.2008. Moving past public anthropology and doing collaborative research. NAPA Bulletin29:70-86.
23.
LeCompte, M.D., and J. Preissle.1993. Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.
24.
Maginn, P.J.2007. Negotiating and securing access: Reflections from a study into urban regeneration and community participation in ethnically diverse neighborhoods in London, England. Field Methods19:425-40.
25.
Marshall, A., and S. Batten.2004. Researching across cultures: Issues of ethics and power. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (online journal), 5. http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-04/04-3-39-e.htm (accessed April 5, 2005).
26.
Mihesuah, D.A.2003. Indigenous American women: Decolonization, empowerment, activism (Contemporary indigenous issues). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
27.
Mihesuah, D.A.2005. So you want to write about American Indians? A guide for writers, students, and scholars. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
28.
Quigley, D.2006. A review of improved ethical practices in environmental and public health research: Case examples from native communities. Health, Education, & Behavior33:130-47.
29.
Rashid, S.F.2007. Accessing married adolescent women: The realities of ethnographic research in an urban slum environment in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Field Methods19:369-83.
30.
Schensul, S.L., J.J. Schensul, and M.D. LeCompte.1999. Essential ethnographic methods: Observations, interviews, and questionnaires. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
31.
Smith, L.T.1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples . London: Zed Books.
32.
Smylie, J.2005. The ethics of research involving Canada’s Aboriginal populations. Canadian Medical Association Journal172:977.
33.
Spradley, J.P.1979. The ethnographic interview. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
34.
Wanat, C.L.2008. Getting past the gatekeepers: Differences between access and cooperation in public school research. Field Methods20:191-208.
35.
Watkins, J.2005. Through wary eyes: Indigenous perspectives on archaeology . Annual Review of Anthropology34:429-49.
36.
Wolcott, H.F.1987. On ethnographic intent. In Interpretive ethnography of education: At home and abroad, eds. G. Spindler and L. Spindler, 37-60. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
