This article compares response behavior in video-enhanced self-administered questionnaires with three standard methods: paper-and-pencil, face-to-face, and audio-enhanced self-administered questionnaires. Although its scope is limited, and only small mode differences were observed, preliminary results suggest that video-enhanced interviews may produce more valid responses in that they are less contaminated by social desirability. Knowledge of video elements integrated in self-administered questionnaires has so far been limited. This study attempts to build a tentative theoretical framework for the interpretation of the mode differences established in the course of this research.
Aiken, L.S., and S.G. West.1998. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newberry Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Baron, S.W.2003. Self-control, social consequences, and criminal behavior: Street youth and the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency40 (4): 403-25.
3.
Bentrup, C., M. Hegeler, and C. Porr.2001. Self-control und kriminelles Handeln . In Gelegenheitsstrukturen und Kriminalität, ed. S. Eifler, S. Schmitt, C. Bentrup, M. Hegeler, I. Pessara, C. Porr, and M. Ratzka, 63-83. Bielefeld, Germany: Universität Bielefeld.
4.
Booth-Kewley, S., G.E. Larson, and D.K. Miyoshi.2007. Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Computers in Human Behavior23 (1): 463-77.
5.
Bronner, A.E., C. Tchaoussoglou, and R. Ross.2003. The virtual interviewer. Eleventh Worldwide Readership Research Symposium, Boston-Cambridge. http://www.cebuco.nl/cms/data/images/11/The%20Virtual%20Interviewer%20Boston.doc (accessed March 22, 2007).
6.
Burton, V.S., F.T. Cullen, T.D. Evans, L.F. Alarid, and G.R. Dunaway.1998. Gender, self-control, and crime. Journal of Research and Delinquency35 (2): 123-47.
7.
Cohen, J., 1977. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . Revised ed. New York: Academic Press.
8.
Couper, M.P.2005. Technology trends in survey data collection. Social Science Computer Review23 (4): 486-501.
9.
Couper, M.P., E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau.2003. Understanding the effects of audio-CASI on self-reports of sensitive behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly67 (3): 385-95.
10.
Daft, R.L., and R.H. Lengel.1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science32 (5): 554-71.
11.
De Leeuw, E.2002. The effect of computer-assisted interviewing on data quality: A review of the evidence. In Social science methodology in the new millennium, ed. J. Blasius, J. Hox, E. de Leeuw, and R. Schmidt, CD-ROM, Leske + Budrich, Opladen, Germany.
12.
---. 2005. To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys . Journal of Official Statistics21 (2): 233-55.
13.
De Leeuw, E., J. Hox, and S. Kef.2003. Computer-assisted self-interviewing tailored for special populations and topics. Field Methods15 (3): 223-51.
14.
De Leeuw, E., J. Hox, S. Kef, and M. Van Hattum.1997. Overcoming the problems of special interviews on sensitive topics: Computer assisted self-interviewing tailored for young children and adolescents. Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, August 20-22, Sequim, Washington .
15.
De Leeuw, E., J. Hox, and G. Snijkers.1995. The effect of computer-assisted interviewing on data quality: A review. Journal of the Market Research Society37 (4): 325-44.
16.
Dillman, D.A.2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method . New York: John Wiley.
17.
Dillman, D.A., and L.M. Christian.2005. Survey mode as a source of instability in responses across surveys. Field Methods17 (1): 30-52.
18.
Dykema, J., J.M. Lepkowski, and S. Blixt.1997. The effect of interviewer and respondent behavior on data quality: Analysis of interaction coding in a validation study . In Survey measurement and process quality, ed. L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. DeLeeuw , C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin , 221-48. New York: John Wiley.
19.
Epstein, J.F., P.R. Barker, and L.A. Kroutil.2001. Mode effects in self-reported mental health data. Public Opinion Quarterly65 (4): 529-49.
20.
Fuchs, M.2003. Kognitive Prozesse und Antwortverhalten in einer Internet-Befragung . Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie28 (4): 19-45.
21.
Ganster, D.C., H.W. Hennessey, and F. Luthans.1983. Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal26 (2): 321-31.
22.
Gerich, J., and R. Lehner.2006. Video computer-assisted self-administered interviews for deaf respondents. Field Methods18 (3): 267-83.
23.
Gottfredson, M.R., and T. Hirschi.1990. A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
24.
Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler, M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau.2004. Survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
25.
Hewitt, M.2002. Attitudes toward interview mode and comparability of reporting sexual behavior by personal interview and audio computer-assisted self-interviewing. Analyses of the 1995 national survey of family growth. Sociological Methods & Research31 (1): 3-26.
26.
House, C.C., and W.L. Nicholls.1988. Questionnaire design for CATI: Design objectives and methods. In 1988: Telephone survey methodology , ed. R. M. Groves, P. P. Biemer, L. E. Lyberg, J. T. Massey, W. L. Nicholls, and J. Waksberg , 421-36. New York: John Wiley.
Johnson, J.G., E.U. Wilke, and E.U. Weber.2004. Beyond a trait view of risk-taking: A domain-specific scale measuring risk perceptions, expected benefits, and perceived-risk attitude in German-speaking populations. Polish Psychological Bulletin35 (3): 153-63.
29.
Joinson, A.N.2001. Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology31 (1): 177-92.
30.
Kane, E.W., and L.J. Macaulay.1993. Interviewer gender and gender attitudes . Public Opinion Quarterly57 (91): 1-28.
31.
Krosnick, J.A.1991. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology5 (3): 213-36.
32.
Krysan, M., and M.P. Couper.2003. Race in the live and the virtual interview: racial deference, social desirability, and activation effects in attitude surveys. Social Psychology Quarterly66 (4): 364-83.
33.
Lessler, J.T., and J.M. O'Reilly.1997. Mode of interview and reporting of sensitive issues: Design and implementation of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing . NIDA Research Monograph167:366-82.
34.
Ling, M.2004. Lügen und Leugnen. In ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente. ZIS Version 8.00. (Electronic handbook of social science inventories). Mannheim, Germany: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen.
35.
Lück, H., and E. Timaeus.2004. Soziale Erwünschtheit (SDS-CM). In ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente. ZIS Version 8.00. (Electronic handbook of social science inventories). Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen. A. Glöckner-Rist (Hrsg.).
36.
Nass, C., Y. Moon, and N. Green.1997. Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology27 (10): 864-76.
37.
Nicholls, W.L. II, R.P. Baker, and J. Martin.1997. The effect of new data collection technologies on survey data quality. In Survey measurement and process quality , ed. L. Lybert, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. DeLeeuw, C. Dippo , N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin, 221-48. New York: John Wiley.
38.
O'Reilly, J.M., M.L. Hubbard, J.T. Lessler, P.P. Biemer, and C.F. Turner.1994. Audio and video computer-assisted self-interviewing: Preliminary tests of new technologies for data collection. Journal of Official Statistics10 (2): 197-214.
39.
Powell, M.B., C.J. Wilson, and M.K. Hasty.2002. Evaluation of the usefulness of "Marvin"; a computerized assessment tool for investigative interviewers of children . Computers in Human Behaviour18 (5): 577-92.
40.
Pratt, T.C., and F.T. Cullen.2000. The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology38 (3): 931-64.
41.
Ramos, M., B.M. Sedivi, and E.M. Sweet.1998. Computerized self-administered questionnaires . In Computer-assisted survey information collection, M. P. Couper, ed. R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. F. Clark, J. Martin , W. L. Nicholls, and J. M. O'Reilly, 389-408. New York: John Wiley.
42.
Richman, W.L., S. Weisband, S. Kiesler, and F. Drasgow.1999. A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology84 (5): 754-75.
43.
Schneider, S.J., and B. Edwards.2000. Developing usability guidelines for audio-CASI respondents with limited literacy skills. Journal of Official Statistics16 (3): 255-71.
44.
Seipel, C.2004. Deutsche Version der Self-Control Skala von Grasmick et al. (1993). In ZUMA-Informationssytem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebnungsinstrumente. ZIS Version 8.00. (Electronic handbook of social science inventories). Mannheim, Germany. Glöckner-Rist, A. (Hrsg.).
45.
Sproull, L., M. Subramani, S. Kiesler, J.H. Walker, and K. Waters.1996. When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction11 (2): 97-124.
46.
Sudman, S., and N.M. Bradburn.1974. Response effects in surveys. Chicago: Aldine.
47.
Tourangeau, R., and K.A. Rasinski.1988. Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin103 (3): 299-314.
48.
Tourangeau, R., L.J. Rips, and K. Rasinski.2000. The psychology of survey response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Tourangeau, R., and T.W. Smith.1996. Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly60 (2): 275-304.
50.
Turner, C.F., L. Ku, S.M. Rogers, L.D. Lindberg, J.H. Pleck, and F.L. Sonenstein .1998. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology . Science280 (5365): 867-73.
51.
Walker, J.H., L. Sproull, and R. Subramani.1994. Using a human face in an interface . In Human factors in computing systems: CHI'94 conference proceedings, ed. B. Adelson, S. Dumais, and J. Olson , 85-91. Boston: ACM.
52.
Weisband, S., and S. Kiesler.1996. Self-disclosure on computer forms: Meta-analysis and implications [online]. Paper presented at the conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 13-18, Vancouver, British Columbia. http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi96/proceedings/papers/Weisband/sw_txt.htm (accessed May 23, 2002 ).
