Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Ethnographers working in research areas devoted to understanding culture through language (e.g., ethnoscience, linguistic semantics, ethnography of communication) must often conduct fieldwork in societies and languages foreign to them. Although the ethnographic interview plays a significant role in this kind of linguistic-oriented research, there is little discussion in the methods literature about the special strategies and techniques needed in the foreign-language interview. The author takes an interactional approach to analyzing the ethnographic interview conducted in the researcher’s nonnative language. She focuses on the possible misunderstandings that can arise between researcher and participants when the researcher’s lexical knowledge of the foreign language does not suffice. Data stem from three interview situations in which the researcher (a native English speaker fluent in German) is unable to understand the particular words and expressions used by the native German participants. The author argues that communicative misunderstandings during the ethnographic interview are possible tools that can ultimately result in the attainment of richer ethnographic data.

Keywords

ethnography foreign language interviewing misunderstandings research methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, L. L. 1999. The mascot researcher: Identity, power, and knowledge in fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28:331-363.

Bernard, H. R. , ed. 1998. Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.

Bernard, H. R. 2000. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Briggs, C. L. 1986. Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Drew, P. 1997. “Open” class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28:69-101.

Fetterman, D. M. 1998. Ethnography: Step by step. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Freeman, D. 1983. Margaret Mead and the heretic: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Middlesex, UK: Penguin.

Ganguly, K. 1992. Accounting for others: Feminism and representation. In Women making meaning: New feminist directions in communication, ed. L. F. Rakow , 60-79. New York: Routledge.

Goodenough, W. H. 1956. Componential analysis and the study of meaning. Language 32:195-216.

10.

Hammersley, M. , and P. Atkinson . 1995. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.

11.

Hymes, D. 1962. The ethnography of speaking. In Anthropology and human behavior, ed. T. Gladwin and W. C. Sturtevant , 13-53. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington.

12.

Levy, R. I. , and D. W. Hollan . 1998. Person-centered interviewing and observation. In Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology, ed. H. R. Bernard , 333-364. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.

13.

Lofland, J. , and L. H. Lofland . 1995. Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. New York: Wadsworth.

14.

Metzger, D. G. , and G. E. Williams . 1966. Procedures and results in the study of native categories: Tseltal firewood. American Anthropologist 68:389-407.

15.

Mishler, E. G. 1986. Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

16.

Naroll, R. 1962. Data quality control: A new research technique. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

17.

Philipsen, G. 1992. Speaking culturally: Explorations in social communication. Albany: State University of New York Press.

18.

Sapir, E. 1949. Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality, ed. D. Mandelbaum . Berkeley: University of California Press.

19.

Schegloff, E. A. 1987. Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics 25:201-218.

20.

Schegloff, E. A. , G. Jefferson , and H. Sacks . 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53 (2): 361-382.

21.

Spradley, J. P. 1979. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

22.

Sturtevant, W. C. 1964. Studies in ethnoscience. American Anthropologist 66 (2): 99-131.

23.

Werner, O. , and J. Fenton . 1973. Method and theory in ethnoscience or ethnoepistemology. In A handbook of method in cultural anthropology, 2nd ed., ed. R. Naroll and R. Cohen , 537-578. New York: Columbia University Press.

24.

Wierzbicka, A. 1972. Semantic primitives. Frankfurt, Germany: Athenäum.

25.

Winchatz, M. R. 2001. Social meanings in German interactions: An ethnographic analysis of the second-person pronoun Sie. Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 (3): 337-369.

26.

Wolcott, H. F. 1995. The art of fieldwork. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.

27.

Wolcott, H. F. 1999. Ethnography: A way of seeing. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.

Fieldworker or Foreigner?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References