This article presents a rationale for initiating non-verbal language training with instruction of Yes and No responses. Selection of an initial Yes/No response mode is based upon compatibility with a future format of communication training and the physical characteristics of the student. The instructional sequence for Yes/No training is detailed, beginning with the training of a Yes response through presentation of desirable items; and followed by training of a No response in an alternating pattern with the Yes response. A case study is presented to illustrate the use and efficacy of these procedures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baer, D., Wolf, M. & Risley, T.Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 91-97.
2.
Bigge, J.Severe communication problems. In J. Bigge and P. O'Donnell (Eds.), Teaching individuals with physical and multiple disabilities. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co., 1976.
Bricker, W. & Bricker, D.A program for language training for the severely handicapped child. Exceptional Children, 1970, 37, 101-111.
5.
Brown, R.A.first language: The early stages. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 1973 .
6.
Fant, L.JR. Ameslan: An introduction to American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD.: National Association of the Deaf , 1972.
7.
Graham, L.Language programming and intervention. In L. Lloyd (Ed.), Communication assessment and intervention strategies . Baltimore: University Park Press , 1976.
8.
Greenfield, P. & Smith, J.The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
9.
Harris-Vanderheiden, D., Brown, W., Mackenzie, P., Reinen, S. & Scheibel, C.Symbol communication for the mentally handicapped. Mental Retardation, 1975, 13, 34-37.
10.
Hung, D. Training and generalization of yes and no as mands in two autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1980, 10, 139-152.
11.
Kahn, J. A comparison of manual and oral language training with mute retarded children. Mental Retardation, 1977, 15, 21-23.
12.
McDonald, E. & Schultz, A.Communication boards for cerebral palsied children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1973, 38, 73-88.
13.
McNaughton, S.Symbol communication programme at OCCC. In G. Vanderheiden & K. Grilley (Eds.), Non-vocal communication techniques and aids for the severely physically handicapped. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978.
14.
Nietupski, J. & Hamre-Nietupski, S.Teaching auxiliary communication skills to severely handicapped students . AAESPH Review, 1979, 4, 107-124.
15.
Ramberg, J., Guess, D., & Sailor, W.Training generalized functional acquisition of "yes" and "no" in three retarded children. AAESPH Review, 1976, 1, 18-39.
16.
Sailor, W., Guess, D., & Baer, D.Functional language for verbally deficient children. Mental Retardation, 1973, 11, 27-35.
17.
Tomkins, L.Indian Sign Language. New York: Denver Publications, Inc., 1969.
18.
Vanderheiden, G.Providing the child with a means to indicate. In G. Vanderheiden & K. Grilley (Eds.), Non-vocal communication techniques and aids for the severely handicappedBaltimore: University Park Press, 1978.
19.
Vanderheiden, G., & Harris-Vanderheiden, D.Communication techniques and aids for the non-vocal severely handicapped. In L. Lloyd (Ed.), Communication assessment and intervention strategies . Baltimore: University Park Press , 1976.
20.
Vicker, B.Nonoral communication system project: 1964-1973. Iowa City : Campus Stores Publishers, University of Iowa, 1974.
