Deafblindness is complex, and there is very limited research on literacy for learners who are deafblind, including on comprehension. This study investigated current practices for comprehension development for learners who are deafblind. Data were collected through a survey and interviews from 63 U.S. participants who were teachers, interveners, and parents. Thematic analysis resulted in the emergence of themes and strategies related to supporting and measuring comprehension during shared reading for learners who are deafblind. Strategies for supporting comprehension include multiple communication forms, customizing the text, repeating, exploring materials, and integrating technology. For measuring comprehension strategies include questioning, completing phrases, commenting and discussing, retelling, sequencing, and extension activities. Implications for research include future investigations on the effectiveness of the strategies currently reported to support and measure comprehension. Implications for practice include developing understanding by supporting communication and access during shared reading while using multiple measures of comprehension.
BellonM. L.OgletreeB. T.HarnW. E. (2000). Repeated storybook reading as a language intervention for children with autism: A case study on the application of scaffolding. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15(1), 52–58.
2.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
BrowderD. M.HudsonM. E.WoodA. L. (2013). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disability who are emergent readers to comprehend passages to text. Exceptionality, 21(4), 191–206.
5.
BrowderD. M.LeeA.MimsP. (2011). Using shared stories and individual response modes to promote comprehension and engagement in literacy for students with multiple, severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2013.802236
6.
BruceS. M. (2005). The application of Werner and Kaplan’s concept of “distancing” to children who are deaf-blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99(8), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0509900803
7.
BruceS. M.BordersC. (2015). Communication and language in learners who are deaf with disabilities: Theories, research, and practice. American Annals of the Deaf, 160, 368–384.
8.
BruceS. M.JanssenM. J.BashinskiS. M. (2016). Individualizing and personalizing communication and literacy instruction for children who are deafblind. Journal of Deafblind Studies on Communication, 2, 73–87.
9.
BruceS. M.NelsonC.PerezA.StutzmanB.BarnhillB. A. (2016). The state of research on communication and literacy in deafblindness. American Annals of the Deaf, 161(4), 424–443.
10.
BrumC.BruceS. M. (2023a). Instructional strategies to support shared reading with learners who are deafblind. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 41(3), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196221077219
11.
BrumC.BruceS. M. (2023b). Shared Reading With Learners Who Are Deafblind: Instructional Materials and Learning Environments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 117(6), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X231183973
12.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design (4th ed.). SAGE.
13.
DowdallN.Melendez-TorresG. J.MurrayL.GardnerF.HartfordL.CooperP. J. (2020). Shared picture book reading interventions for child language development: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Development, 91(2), e383–e399. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13225
14.
FerrellK. A.BruceS.LucknerJ. L. (2014). Evidence-based practices for students with sensory impairments [Document No. IC-4]. University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/
15.
FlickU. (2019). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE.
16.
HanreddyA. (2015). The relationship between communication and literacy. In DowningJ. E.HanreddyA.Peckham-HardinK. D. (Eds.). Teaching communication skills to students with severe disabilities (pp. 189–212). Brookes.
17.
HartmannE.WeismerP. (2016). Technology implementation and curriculum engagement for children and youth who are deafblind. American Annals of the Deaf, 161(4), 462–473.
HudsonM.BrowderD. M.WakemanS. (2013). Helping students with moderate and severe intellectual disability access grade-level text. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(3), 14–23.
20.
IngrahamC. L.AndrewsJ. F. (2010). The hands and reading: What deafblind adult readers tell us. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 28(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619609359416
21.
LucknerJ. L.BruceS. M.FerrellK. A. (2016). A summary of the communication and literacy evidence-based practices for students who are deaf or hard of hearing, visually impaired, and deafblind. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(4), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740115597507
22.
McKenzieA. R. (2009). Emergent literacy supports for students who are deaf-blind or have visual and multiple impairments: A multiple-case study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(5), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0910300507
23.
McKenzieA. R.DavidsonR. (2007). The emergent literacy of preschool students who are deaf-blind: A case study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101(11), 720–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0710101106
24.
MimsP. J.HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M. (2012). Using read-alouds of grade-level biographies and systematic prompting to promote comprehension for students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disorders, 27(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357612446859
25.
NelsonC.BruceS. (2016). Critical issues in the lives of children and youth who are deafblind. American Annals of the Deaf, 161(4), 406–411.
26.
NelsonC.BruceS. (2019). Children who are deaf/hard of hearing with disabilities: Paths to language and literacy. Education Sciences, 9(134), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020134
PiastaS. B.JusticeL. M.McGintyA. S.KaderavekJ. N. (2012). Increasing young children’s contact with print during shared reading: Longitudinal effects on literacy achievement. Child Development, 83(3), 810–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01754.x
29.
SénéchalM.CornellE. H. (1993). Vocabulary acquisition through shared reading experiences. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 360–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/747933
30.
SénéchalM.PaganS.LeverR.OuelletteG. P. (2008). Relations among the frequency of shared reading and 4-year-old children’s vocabulary, morphological and syntax comprehension, and narrative skills. Early Education and Development, 19(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280701838710
31.
SpoonerF.Kemp-InmanA.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.WoodL.DavisL. L. (2015). Generalization of literacy skills through portable technology for students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915586190
32.
ToewsS. G.McQuestionJ.KurthJ. A. (2021). Evaluation of the evidence base for shared reading to support literacy skill development for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 46(2), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969211008531
33.
TowsonJ. A.AkemogluY.WatkinsL.ZengS. (2021). Shared interactive book reading interventions for young children with disabilities: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(6), 2700–2715. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00401
34.
WasikB. A.HindmanA. H.SnellE. K. (2016). Book reading and vocabulary development: A systematic review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 37, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.04.003
