This study examined the effect of explicit and engaging supplemental early literacy instruction on at-risk kindergarten children’s literacy development. Sixty-three kindergarten-aged children who had been ranked in the lowest 20th percentile on basic literacy skills participated in this study (38 treatment). Results reveal that children who received engaging and explicit supplemental instruction from a paraeducator performed significantly better on rhyming, alliteration, letter knowledge, letter-sound association, spelling, and blending tasks than children who received one-on-one instruction through a tutoring program. Findings highlight the important role that paraeducators can play in implementing explicit and engaging literacy curriculum that positively affects children’s development of early literacy skills.
Alborough, J. ( 1999). Duck in the truck. New York: HarperCollins.
2.
Alexander, K.L., & Entwisle, D.R. (1988). Achievement in the first two years of school: Patterns and processes. Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development, 53(Serial No. 218).
3.
Allington, R.L. ( 1992). Literacy for all children: How to get information on several proven programs for accelerating the progress of low-achieving children . The Reading Teacher, 46, 246-248.
4.
Allington, R.L. ( 1994). The schools we have. The schools we need. The Reading Teacher, 48, 14-29.
5.
Allington, R.L., & Cunningham, P.M. (1996). Schools that work: Where all children read and write. New York: Longman.
6.
Ashbaker, B.Y., Young, J.R., & Morgan, J. ( 2001, March 1-4). Paraeducators: Their roles in the instructional process. Paper presented at the 53rd annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Dallas, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 454 223)
7.
Baker, L., Afflerbach, P., & Reinking, D. ( 1996). Developing engaged readers in school and home communities: An overview. In L. Baker, P. Afflerbach, & D. Reinking (Eds.), Developing engaged reading in school and home communities (pp. xiii-xxvii). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Baker, L., Dreher, M. J., & Guthrie, J. T. (Eds.). (2000). Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation. Solving problems in the teaching of literacy. New York: Guilford.
9.
Baker, L., & Scher, D. ( 2002). Beginning readers’ motivation for reading in relation to parental beliefs and home reading experiences. Reading Psychology, 23, 239-269.
10.
Barnett, S.W. ( 2001). Preschool education for economically disadvantaged children: Effects on reading achievement and related outcomes. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of Early Literacy Research . (pp. 421-443). New York: Guilford Press.
11.
Bingham, G.E. ( 2007). Maternal literacy beliefs and the quality of mother-child book reading interactions: Associations with children’s early literacy development. Early Education and Development, 18, 23-49.
12.
Bowman, B., Donovan, M. S. , & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13.
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: NAEYC.
14.
Brookes-Gunn, J. ( 2003). Do you believe in magic? What we can expect from early childhood intervention programs. Social Policy Report, Society for Research in Child Development, 17(1), 1-14.
15.
Brown, L., Farrington, K., Ziegler, M., Knight, T., & Ross, C. ( 1999). Fewer paraprofessionals and more teachers and therapists in education programs for students with significant disabilities. The Journal of the Associations for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 24, 249-252.
16.
Catts, H.W., Fey, M.E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J.B. ( 2001). Predicting reading disabilities: Research to practice . Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 38-50.
17.
Chambers, J.G., Parrish, T.B., & Harr, J.J. ( 2002). What are we spending on special education services in the United States, 1999-2000?Washington, DC: Special Education Expenditure Project. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 99CO0091)
18.
Chopra, R.V., Sandoval-Lucero, E., Aragon, L., Bernal, C., Berg De Balderas, H., & Carroll, D. ( 2004). The paraprofessional role of connector. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 219-231.
19.
Culatta, B., Aslett, R., Fife, M., & Setzer, L.A. ( 2004). Project SEEL: Part 1. Systematic and engaging early literacy instruction. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 25, 79-88.
20.
Culatta, B., & Hall, K.M. ( 2006). Phonological awareness instruction in early childhood settings. In Clinical Approaches to Emergent Literacy Intervention. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
21.
Culatta, B., Reese, M., Setzer, L.A. ( 2006). Early literacy instruction in a dual-language (Spanish-English) kindergarten. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 27, 67-82.
22.
Cunningham, A.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934-945.
23.
de Anda, D. ( 2007). Intervention research and program evaluation in the school setting: Issues and alternative research designs. Children and Schools, 29(2), 87-94.
24.
Dickinson, D.K., & Sprague, K.E. ( 2001). The nature and impact of early childhood care environments on the language and early literacy development of children from low-income families. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 263-280). New York: Guilford.
25.
Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Willows, D.M., Schuster, B.V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. ( 2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250-287.
26.
Elbro, C., & Petersen, D.K. (2004). Long-term effects of phoneme awareness and letter sound training: An intervention study with children at risk for dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 660-670.
27.
Farkas, G. ( 1998). Reading One-to-One: An intensive program serving a great many students while still achieving large effects. In J. Crane (Ed.), Social programs that work (pp. 75-109). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
28.
Fey, M.E., Catts, H.W., & Larrivee, L.S. (1995). Preparing preschoolers for the academic and social challenges of school. In M. E. Fey, J. Windsor, & S. F. Warren (Eds.), Language intervention: Preschool through the elementary years (pp. 3-37). Baltimore, MD : Brookes.
29.
Gest, S.D., & Gest, J.M. ( 2005). Reading tutoring for students at academic and behavioral risk: Effects on time-on-time task in the classroom. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 25-47.
30.
Giangreco, M.F., Broer, S.M., & Edelman, S.W. ( 2002). "That was then, this is now!" Paraprofessional supports for students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptionality, 10, 47-64.
Giangreco, M.F., Yuan, S., McKenzie, B., Cameron, P., & Fialka, J. ( 2005). "Be careful what you wish for . . .": Five reasons to be concerned about the assignment of individual paraprofessionals. Teaching Exceptional Children, 65, 315-328.
33.
Grant, H., & Dweck, C.S. ( 2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541-553.
Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A., & Black, C. ( 2002). Supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 69-79.
36.
Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. ( 2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 331-341.
37.
International ReadingAssociation. (2007). Standards for reading professionals. . Retrieved March 6, 2009 , from http://www.reading.org/downloads/standards/definitions.pdf
38.
Invernizzi, M., Justice, L., Landrum, T.J., & Booker, K. ( 2004). Early literacy screening in kindergarten: Widespread implementation in Virginia. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 479-500.
39.
Invernizzi, M., Sullivan, A., & Meier, J. ( 2001). PALS-K Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
40.
Juel, C. ( 1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
41.
Juel, C. ( 1996). What makes literacy tutoring effective? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 268-289.
42.
Justice, L.M., & Kaderavek, J.N. (2004). Embedded-explicit emergent literacy intervention I: Background and description of approach. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 201-211.
43.
Kovarsky, D., & Maxwell, M. ( 1997). Rethinking the context of language in schools. Language , Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28, 219-230.
44.
Lyon, R. ( 1999, May). Reading development, reading disorders, and reading instruction: Research-based findings. Language Learning and Education: ASHA Division 1 Newsletter, pp. 8-16.
45.
McCardle, P., Scarborough, H.S., & Catts, H.W. ( 2001). Predicting, explaining, and preventing children’s reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice , 16(4), 230-239.
46.
McFadden, T. ( 1998). Sounds and stories: Teaching phonemic awareness in interactions around text. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology , 7, 5-13.
47.
Neuman, S., Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. ( 2000). Learning to read and write: Developmentally appropriate practices for young children. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
48.
Pappas, C., Hart, S., Escobar, D., Jones, H., & O’Malley, D. (2001). Two teachers’ efforts to transform the reading-aloud curriculum genre for collaboration: Examining shifts of process and content dimensions of sharing authority. In C. Pappas & L. B. Zecker (Eds.), Transforming literacy curriculum genres (pp. 127-156). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
Pellegrini, A.D. ( 2001). Some theoretical and methodological considerations in studying literacy in social context. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 54-65). New York: Guilford.
50.
Pellegrini, A.D., & Galda, L. ( 2000). Commentary-Cognitive development, play and literacy: Issues of definition and developmental function. In K. A. Roskos & J. F. Christie (Eds.), Play and literacy in early childhood: Research from multiple perspectives (pp. 63-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
Perry, K.E., Donohue, K.M., & Weinstein, R.S. (2007). Teaching practices and the promotion of achievement and adjustment in first grade. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 269-292.
52.
Raudenbush, S.W., Martinez, A., & Spybrook, J. ( 2007). Strategies for improving precision in group-randomized experiments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 5-29.
53.
Richgels, D.J., Poremba, K.J., & McGee, L.M. (1996). Kindergartners talk about print: Phonemic awareness in meaningful contexts. The Reading Teacher, 49(8), 632-642.
54.
Ripple, C.H., & Zigler, E. ( 2003). Research, policy, and the federal role in prevention initiatives for children. American Psychologist, 58, 482-490.
55.
Roswell, F., & Chall, J. ( 1997). Roswell-Chall Auditory Blending Test. New York: Essay Press. (Original work published 1963)
56.
Sénéchal, M., LeFevre, J., Smith-Chant, B.L., & Colton, K.V. ( 2001). On refining theoretical models of emergent literacy: The role of empirical evidence. Journal of School Psychology , 39, 439-460.
57.
Shadish, W.R., & Luellen, J.K. ( 2006). Quasi-experimental design. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 539-550). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
Share, D.L., & Stanovich, K.E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education, 1, 1-57.
59.
Shaw, N., & Apple, M. ( 1986). Sheep in a Jeep. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
60.
Simmons, D.C., Kame’enui, E.J., Stoolmiller, M., Coyne, M.D., & Harn, B. ( 2003). Accelerating growth and maintaining proficiency: A two-year intervention study of kindergarten and first grade children at risk for reading difficulties. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 197-228). Timonium, MD: York Press.
61.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
62.
Sonnenschein, S., & Munsterman, K. (2002). The influence of home-based reading interactions on 5-year-olds’ reading motivations and early literacy development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 31, 8-337.
63.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., & Garvan, C. ( 1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579-593.
64.
Ukrainetz, T.A., Cooney, M.H., Dyer, S.K., Kysar, A.J., & Harris, T.J. ( 2000). An investigation into teaching phonemic awareness through shared reading and writing. Early Childhood Research Quarterly , 15, 331-355.
65.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). The condition of education 2007 (NCES 2007-064). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
66.
Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Peyton, J.A. ( 2006). Code-oriented instruction for kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties: A randomized field trial with paraeducator implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 508-528.
67.
Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Tudor, S. ( 2007). Effectiveness of paraeducator-supplemented individual instruction: Beyond basic decoding skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 508-525.
68.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M.B. ( 1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
69.
Verhoeven, L. ( 2001). Prevention of reading difficulties. In L. Verhoeven & C. Snow (Eds.), Literacy and motivation: Reading engagement in individuals and groups (pp. 123-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
70.
Wright, D.B. ( 2006). Comparing groups in a before-after design: When t test and ANCOVA produce different results. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 663-675.
71.
Yopp, H.K. ( 1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests . Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159-177.
72.
Yopp, H.K. ( 1992). Developing phonemic awareness in young children. The Reading Teacher, 45(9), 696-706.
