The study aimed at evaluating the diadochokinetic (DDK) skills of Greek-speaking preschool children with phonological disorder (PD) by means of a structured evaluation protocol and at proposing cut-off points for children at risk of speech impairment. The participants were 36 children with PD and 60 typically developing (TD) peers. The groups were matched on age and gender. The PD group performed significantly slower than the TD group in all speech DDK tasks but not in the oral-motor tasks. The ROC analysis showed a statistically significant positive discrimination for all speech tasks. The internal consistency of the protocol was excellent (Cronbach’s α = .844), while complex stimuli showed a better discriminatory ability. The obtained results agree with Dodd’s classification for speech sound disorders (SSDs). Different types of speech stimuli must be included in the evaluation of DDK performance as a clinical predictor for preschoolers with SSDs who face difficulties in speech maturation.
BearzottiF.TavanoA.FabbroF. (2007). Development of orofacial praxis of children from 4 to 8 years of age. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 1355–1366. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.104.4.1355-1366
2.
BernthalE. J.BanksonW. N.FlipsenP.Jr. (2017). Articulation and phonological disorders (1st ed.). Konstadaras Medical Publications.
3.
BertagnolliC. P. A.GubianniB. M.CeronM.Keske-SoaresM. (2015). Orofacial praxis abilities in children with speech disorders. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 19, 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-15515
4.
CoadyJ. A.EvansJ. L. (2008). Uses and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairment (SLI). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820601116485
5.
CohenW.WatersD.HewlettN. (1998). DDK rates in the pediatric clinic: A methodological minefield. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 33, 428–433. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829809179463
6.
DiepeveenS.van HaaftenL.TerbandH.de SwartB.MaassenB. (2019). A standardized protocol for maximum repetition rate assessment in Children. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 71, 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500305
7.
DoddB. (2014). Differential diagnosis of pediatric speech sound disorder. Current Developmental Disorders Review, 1, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-014-0017-3.
8.
DworkinP. J.CulattaA. R. (1985). Oral structural and neuromuscular characteristics in children with normal and disordered articulation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5002.150
9.
FletcherG. S. (1972). Time-by-count measurement of diadochokinetic syllable rate. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 15(4), 763–770. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1504.763
10.
GubianniB. M.MarinideCarliK.Keske-SoaresM. (2015). Phonological disorder and alterations of orofacial praxis and the stomatognathic system. REVISTA CEFAC Speech Language Hearing and Education Journal, 17(1), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216201517513
11.
IchtM.Ben-DavidM. B. (2017). Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the administration of the sequential motion rates task. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 00(0), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/15257401177131
12.
Iuzzini-SeigelJ. (2019). Motor performance in children with childhood apraxia of speech and speech sound disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(9), 3220–3233. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0380
13.
KentD. R. (2015). Nonspeech oral movements and oral motor disorders: A narrative review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(4), 763–789. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0179
14.
KrzanowskiW. J.HandD. J. (2009). ROC curves for continuous data. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
15.
LevantiI.KirpotinL.KardamitsiI.KambouroglouM. (1995). Test of phonetic and phonological development: Manual. Panhellenic Association of Logopedists-Logotherapists (PSL).
16.
LockeJ. (2002). Vocal development in the human infant: Functions and phonetics. In WinsdorF.KellyM. L.HewlettN. (Eds.), Investigations in clinical phonetics and linguistics (1st ed., pp. 243–256). Erlbaum.
McCauleyR.StrandE. (2008). A review of standardized tests of nonverbal oral and speech motor performance in children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/007)
19.
McNuttJ. C. (1977). Oral sensory and motor behaviors of children with /s/ or /r/ misarticulations. Journal of Speech and Hearing, 20(4), 694–703. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2004.694
20.
NewmeyerJ. A.GretherS.GrashaC.WhiteJ.AkersR.AylwardC.IshikawaK.deGrauwT. (2007). Fine motor function and oral-motor imitation skills in preschool-age children with speech-sound disorders. Clinical Pediatrics, 46(7), 604–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922807299545
21.
PeterB. (2012). Oral and hand movement speeds are associated with expressive language ability in children with speech sound disorder. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-012-9199-1
22.
PrathaneeB.ThanaviratananichS.PongjanyakulA. (2003). Oral diadochokinetic rates for normal Thai children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38(4), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/1368282031000154042
23.
PrestonJ. L.EdwardsM. L. (2009). Speed and accuracy of rapid speech output by adolescents with residual speech sound errors including rhotics. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23(4), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200802680833
24.
TuomiK. S.WinterM. N. (1977). Diadochokinesia and articulation impairment. Human Communication, 2, 141–150.
25.
WertznerF. H.Pagan-NevesL.AlvesR. R.BarrozoF. T. (2013). Implications of diadochokinesia in children with speech sound disorder. Codas, 25(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-17822013000100010
26.
WilliamsP.StackhouseJ. (1998). Diadochokinetic skills: Normal and atypical performance in children aged 3–5 years. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 33, 481–486. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829809179472
27.
WilliamsP.StackhouseJ. (2000). Rate, accuracy and consistency: Diadochokinetic performance of young, normally developing children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 14(4), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200050023985
28.
World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders.
29.
WrenY. E.RoulstoneS. E.MillerL. L. (2012). Distinguishing groups of children with persistent speech disorder: Findings from a prospective population study. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 37(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2011.625973
30.
YarussJ. S.LoganJ. K. (2002). Evaluating rate, accuracy, and fluency of young children’s diadochokinetic productions: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 27, 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-730X(02)00112-2
31.
ZamaniP.RezaiH.GarmataniT. N. (2017). Meaningful words and non-words repetitive articulatory rate (oral diadochokinesis) in Persian speaking children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9469-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
