This study investigated factors prioritized by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and caregivers for telehealth services involving speech-language assessments and interventions and determined whether the priorities differed between SLPs and caregivers in Korea. The survey data obtained from 23 SLPs and 50 caregivers were analyzed using analytic hierarchical process (AHP) methodology. The results showed that the “SLP” category was the most important high-level category and “building rapport with the child client” in the “SLP” category was of the highest priorities for both SLPs and caregivers across all factors. Furthermore, the rank-order of a few categories and the global priority between SLPs and caregivers varied slightly. These findings suggest that, in addition to important factors associated with SLPs and caregivers, the different expectations of service providers and clients using telepractice in Korea should be addressed.
AkamogluY.MeadanH.PearsonJ. N.CummingsK. (2018). Getting connected: Speech and language pathologists’ perceptions of building rapport via telepractice. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 30(4), 569–585.
ChungM.-J.SeoJ. E. (2010). A study on the states and demands for desire of the rehabilitation service according to property of handicapped children-focused on the children who received a benefit of vouchers work. Korean Journal of Family Welfare, 15(4), 157–173.
5.
ChungY. J.KimY. T.SimH. S.NamK. C.KwonM. S. (2003). Treatment efficacy: The computer as a treatment supplement for improving word comprehension and production in aphasic adults. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 8(3), 112–133.
6.
DobranskyN. D.FrymierA. B. (2004). Developing teacher-student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 211–223.
7.
DolanJ. G. (2008). Shared decision-making—Transferring research into practice: The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Patient Education Counseling, 73(3), 418–425.
8.
DuffyJ. R.WervenG. W.AronsonA. E. (1997). Telemedicine and the diagnosis of speech and language disorders. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 7212(12), 1116–1122.
9.
Eriks-BrophyA.QuittenbaumJ.AndersonD.NelsonT. (2008). Part of the problem or part of the solution? Communication assessments of aboriginal children residing in remote communities using videoconferencing. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 228(8), 589–609.
10.
GlykasM.ChytasP. (2004). Technology assisted speech and language therapy. International Journal of Medical Informatic, 73(6), 529–541.
11.
Grogan-JohnsonS.AlvaresR.RowanL.CreagheadN. (2010). A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of speech language therapy provided by telemedicine with conventional on-site therapy. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 16(3), 134–139.
12.
Grogan-JohnsonS.SchmidtA. M.SchenkerJ.AlvaresR.RowanL. E.TaylorJ. (2013). A comparison of speech sound intervention delivered by telepractice and side-by-side service delivery models. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 344(4), 210–220.
13.
KeckC. S.DoarnC. R. (2014). Telehealth technology applications in speech-language pathology. Telemedicine Journal and E-health, 20(7), 653–659.
14.
KimH. J.KwonS. B. (2018). The effect of augmented reality-based language therapy program on the vocabulary strength improvement in children with language developmental delay. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Disorders, 27(3), 87–96.
15.
KimS. J. (2008). Present status and desires of the participants in the voucher program for therapy and rehabilitation. Korean Academy of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, 134(4), 691–706.
16.
MachimaP. A.DoarnC. R. (2008). Overview of telehealth activities in speech-language pathology. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 14(10), 1101–1117.
17.
Marble-FlintK. J.StrattmanK. H.Schommer-AikinsM. A. (2019). Comparing iPad and paper assessments for children with ASD: An initial study. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 403(3), 152–155.
18.
McCulloughA. (2001). Viability and effectiveness of teletherapy for pre-school children with special needs. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36(s1), 321–326.
19.
Molini-AvejonasD.Rondon-MeloS.Cibelle AmatoA.SamelliA. (2015). A systematic review of the use of telehealth in speech, language and hearing sciences. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 21(7), 367–376.
OhS. J.ParkS. H. (2014). Practice of language assessment and education service for multi-cultural children. Special Education Research, 133(3), 249–271
22.
OverbyM. S.Baft-NeffA. (2017). Perceptions of telepractice pedagogy in speech-language pathology: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 23(5), 550–557.
23.
PauerF.SchmidtK.BabacA.DammK.FrankM.von der SchulenburgJ.-M. G. (2016). Comparison of different approaches applied in analytic hierarchy process: An example of information needs of patients with rare diseases. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision, 16, Article 117.
24.
SaatyT. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.
25.
SaatyT. L. (2000). On the relativity of relative measures: Accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 121(1), 205–212.
26.
SchmidtK.BabacA.PauerF.DammK.von der SchulenburgJ. M. (2016). Measuring patients’ priorities using the analytic hierarchy process in comparison with Best-Worst-Scaling and rating cards: Methodological aspects and ranking tasks. Health Economics Review, 6(1), Article 50.
TuckerJ. K. (2012). Perspectives of speech-language pathologists on the use of telepractice in school: The qualitative view. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 4(2), 47–60.
29.
WaiteM. C.CahillL. M.TheodorosD. G.BusuttinS.RussellT. G. (2006). A pilot study of online assessment of childhood speech disorders. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12(3), 92–94.
30.
WaiteM. C.TherodorosD. G.RussellT. G.CahillL. M. (2010). Internet-based telehealth assessment of language using the CELF-4. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 414(4), 445–458.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
