A Qualitative Evaluation of Treatment App Features for Children With Speech Sound Disorders

Abstract

This research examined the cost and features of 20 speech sound disorder (SSD) treatment apps as part of the feature mapping paradigm. Methods included the development of a 48-item SSD checklist culled from the extant literature and sorted into 10 categories: linguistic level, feedback types, customization, image types, image iconicity, speech models, technical support, engagement, motor access, and activities. Two independent reviewers rated the apps on both iPhones and iPads. App cost was capped at US$25. Seven trends emerged for characterizing commercial contemporary SSD apps: (a) word-level stimuli and few exaggerated speech models, (b) general, but nearly absent speech production, feedback, (c) few customization opportunities, (d) varied, and some diverse, images, (e) varied technical elements and supports, (f) engaging and easily manipulated flash cards, and (g) number of features not necessarily related to cost. Child- and clinician-specific clinical implications are discussed.

Keywords

articulation/phonology exceptionalities qualitative research designs speech-language pathologists technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmed

Monroe

Hair

Tan

C. T.

Gutierrez-Osuna

Ballard

K. J.

(2018). Speech-driven mobile games for speech therapy: User experiences and feasibility. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(6), 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2018.1513562

Alliano

Herriger

Koutsoftas

A. D.

Bartolotta

D. E.

(2012). A review of 21 iPad applications for augmentative and alternative communication purposes. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(2), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1044/aac21.2.60

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.-a). Speech sound disorders: Articulation and phonology. https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/articulation-and-phonology/

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.-b). Speech sound disorders: Articulation and phonology. https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/articulation-and-phonology/#collapse_6

Apple Apps Store. (n.d.). App review guidelines. https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/

Aziz

M. A.

Jalil

S. Z. A.

Rahaman

S. A. S. A.

Abdullah

Ismail

S. H.

Aris

S. A. M.

Noor

N. M.

Aziz

M. A. A.

(2021, November 9–10). Development of speech therapy mobile application for aphasia patients [Conference session]. 2021 IEEE National Biomedical Engineering Conference (NBEC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/NBEC53282.2021.9618759

Bauman-Wäengler

J. A.

(2020). Articulation and phonology in speech sound disorders: A clinical focus (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

P. H.

Tong

Chen

P. Q.

Fan

Tang

Cheng

A. S.

Liu

(2022). A mobile-based virtual reality speech rehabilitation app for patients with aphasia after stroke: Development and pilot usability study. JMIR Serious Games, 10(2), e30196. https://doi.org/10.2196/30196

Byun

T. M.

Campbell

Carey

Liang

Park

T. H.

Svirsky

(2017). Enhancing intervention for residual rhotic errors via app-delivered biofeedback: A case study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(6S), 1810–1817. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0248

10.

Dean

E. C.

Howell

Waters

Reid

(1995). Metaphon: A metalinguistic approach to the treatment of phonological disorder in children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209508985318

11.

Deshpande

A. K.

Shimunova

(2019). A comprehensive evaluation of tinnitus apps. American Journal of Audiology, 28(3), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJA-18-0135

12.

Choe

Vega

Liu

Trujillo

(2022). Listening to stakeholders involved in speech-language therapy for children with communication disorders: Content analysis of apple app store reviews. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, 5(1), e28661. https://doi.org/10.2196/2866

13.

Evitts

P. M.

Fields

Lande

(2021). Metadeglutition? Rate of aspiration-related events in healthy females using a novel data collection app. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 6(2), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_PERSP-20-00036

14.

Farrall

(2013). AAC apps and ASD: Giving voice to good practice. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 2(22), 157–163. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/abs/10.1044/aac22.3.157. https://doi.org/10.1044/aac22.3.157

15.

Fitriani

Prayogo

(2020). Addressing language development barriers: A pedagogical approach for young children with speech delay. In Hasbi

Somantri

Adriany

(Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on early childhood education and parenting 2019 (ECEP 2019) (pp. 81–85). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200808.015

16.

Flinner

Sullivan

(2021). The speech-language pathologist evaluating appropriateness of learning apps as a service delivery model for children with hearing loss. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 6(6), 1533–1539. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_PERSP-21-00057

17.

Furlong

Erickson

Morris

M. E.

(2017). Computer-based speech therapy for childhood speech sound disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders, 68, 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.06.007

18.

Furlong

Morris

Erickson

Serry

(2016). Quality of mobile phone and tablet mobile apps for speech sound disorders: Protocol for an evidence-based appraisal. JMIR Research Protocols, 5(4), e233. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.6505

19.

Furlong

Morris

Serry

Erickson

(2018). Mobile apps for treatment of speech disorders in children: An evidence-based analysis of quality and efficacy. PLOS ONE, 13(8), e0201513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201513

20.

Gerber

S. M.

Schütz

Uslu

A. S.

Schmidt

Röthlisberger

Wyss

Perny

Wyss

Koenig-Bruhin

Urwyler

Nyffeler

Marchal-Crespo

Mosimann

U. P.

Müri

R. M.

Nef

(2019). Therapist-guided tablet-based telerehabilitation for patients with aphasia: Proof-of-concept and usability study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 6(1), e13163. https://doi.org/10.2196/13163

21.

Gosnell

Costello

Shane

(2011). Using a clinical approach to answer “what communication apps should we use?” Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(3), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1044/aac20.3.87

22.

Jesus

L. M. T.

Martinez

Santos

Hall

Joffe

(2019). Comparing traditional and tablet-based intervention for children with speech sound disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(11), 4045–4061. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0301

23.

Kim

E. S.

Laird

Wilson

Bieg

Mildner

Möller

Schatz

Schwarz

Spang

Voigt-Antons

J.-N.

Rochon

(2021). Implementation and effects of an information technology–based intervention to support speech and language therapy among stroke patients with aphasia: Protocol for a virtual randomized controlled trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 10(7), e30621. https://doi.org/10.2196/30621

24.

Lehner

Ziegler

, & KommPaS Study Group. (2022). Clinical measures of communication limitations in dysarthria assessed through crowdsourcing: Specificity, sensitivity, and retest-reliability. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 36(11), 988–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2021.1979658

25.

Macchi

Caët

Patin

Descamps

da Silva-Genest

Gibaru

Bris

K. L.

(2023, July 9–14). (Ex)changing perspectives on speech and language pathologists’ scaffolding practices: When getting the right meaning becomes more central than getting the right words. 18th International Pragmatics Conference, Bruxelles, Belgium. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04276238

26.

Madeira

R. N.

Mestre

Ferreirinha

(2017). Phonological disorders in children? Design and user experience evaluation of a mobile serious game approach. Procedia Computer Science, 113, 416–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.359

27.

McKechnie

Ahmed

Gutierrez-Osuna

Murray

McCabe

Ballard

K. J.

(2020). The influence of type of feedback during tablet-based delivery of intensive treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 87, 106026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106026

28.

McLeod

Ballard

K. J.

Ahmed

McGill

Brown

M. I.

(2020). Supporting children with speech sound disorders during covid-19 restrictions: Technological solutions. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 5(6), 1805–1808. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_PERSP-20-00128

29.

Muñoz

M. L.

Hoffman

L. M.

Brimo

(2013). Be smarter than your phone: A framework for using apps in clinical practice. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 40, 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1044/cicsd_40_F_138

30.

O’Connor

J. R.

Jr. Jackson

K. N.

(2020). The use of iPad® devices and “Apps” for ASD students in special education and speech therapy. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Accessibility and diversity in education (pp. 446–463). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1213-5.ch023

31.

Olson

Williams

Livingston

Futscher

(2018). Review of auditory training mobile apps for adults with hearing loss. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 3(7), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp3.SIG7.12

32.

Olszewski

Smith

Franklin

A. D.

(2022). Speech-language pathologists’ feelings and practices regarding technological apps in school service delivery. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 53(4), 1051–1073. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_LSHSS-21-00150

33.

Orbes

Guevara

Baldeón Egas

P. F.

Toasa

R. M.

(2022). Mobile app as an alternative in the process of speech therapy in children with cerebral palsy. In Zambrano

Vizuete Botto-Tobar

Diaz Cadena

Durakovic

(Eds.), Innovation and research—A driving force for socio-economic-technological development (pp. 479–489). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11438-0_38

34.

Osborne

C. L.

Juengst

S. B.

Smith

E. E.

(2021). Identifying user-centered content, design, and features for mobile health apps to support long-term assessment, behavioral intervention, and transitions of care in neurological rehabilitation: An exploratory study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022620954115

35.

Peterson

Savarese

Campbell

Simpson

K. O.

McAllister

(2022). Telepractice treatment of residual rhotic errors using app-based biofeedback: A pilot study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 53(2), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00084

36.

Rehman

I. U.

Sobnath

Nasralla

M. M.

Winnett

Anwar

Asif

Sherazi

H. H. R.

(2021). Features of mobile apps for people with autism in a post COVID-19 scenario: Current status and recommendations for apps using AI. Diagnostics, 11(10), 1923. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101923

37.

Romero

R. L.

Kates

Hart

Ojeda

Meirom

Hardy

(2019). Quality of deaf and hard-of-hearing mobile apps: Evaluation using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) with additional criteria from a content expert. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(10), e14198. https://doi.org/10.2196/14198

38.

Sawyer

K. N.

(2022). An assessment of mobile applications targeting speech sound disorders and accent modification [Unpublished Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Wyoming].

39.

Steele

Woronoff

(2011). Design challenges of AAC apps, on wireless portable devices, for persons with aphasia. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(2), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1044/aac20.2.41

40.

Stoyanov

S. R.

Hides

Kavanagh

D. J.

Zelenko

Tjondronegoro

Mani

(2015). Mobile App Rating Scale: A new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 3(1), e27. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3422

41.

Vaezipour

Campbell

Theodoros

Russell

(2020). Mobile apps for speech-language therapy in adults with communication disorders: Review of content and quality. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(10), e18858. https://doi.org/10.2196/18858

42.

van Leer

Lewis

Porcaro

. (2021). Effect of an iOS app on voice therapy adherence and motivation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(1), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00213

43.

Wild

M. R.

(2013). Assistive technology for cognition following brain injury: Guidelines for device and app selection. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 23(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1044/nnsld23.2.49

44.

Wild

M. R.

Sohlberg

M. M.

(2014). Principles of app selection and training after brain injury. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1044/aac23.3.140