The application of specific motor learning principles (MLPs) in treatment for developmental motor-based articulation disorder in children has not been reported to date. The aims were to determine treatment effects of a novel hybrid intervention approach for a single participant with motor-based articulation disorder, and to examine the role of specific MLP, namely blocked versus serial practice schedules, in performance, generalization, and maintenance of speech skills. Results suggested that the novel hybrid treatment approach produced measurable gains in most instances. However, there were no systematic differences between the different practice schedules. Possible reasons for these specific treatment and generalization effects were explored.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2007). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders (Position statement). Available from www.asha.org/policy
2.
BakerW.TrofimovichP.FlegeJ.MackM.HalterR. (2008). Child-adult differences in second language phonological learning: The role of cross-language similarity. Language and Speech, 51, 316–341.
3.
BarlowD. H.NockM. K.HersenM. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
4.
Bauman-WaenglerJ. (2016). Articulatory and phonological impairments: Pearson new international edition, A clinical focus (5th ed.). Oxnard, CA: Pearson.
5.
BeesonP. M.RobeyR. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the Aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 161–169.
6.
BernthalJ. E.BanksonN. W.FlipsenP. (2013). Articulation and phonological disorders: Speech sound disorders in children. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
7.
BislickL. P.WeirP. C.SpencerK.KendallD.YorkstonK. M. (2012). Do principles of motor learning enhance retention and transfer of speech skills? A systematic review. Aphasiology, 26, 709–728.
8.
BowenC. (2014). Sound reasoning: Therapy targets and techniques for children with speech sound disorders. Available from http://www.speech-language-therapy.com
9.
BrumbaughK. M.SmitA. B. (2013). Treating children ages 3-6 who have speech sound disorders: A survey. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in School, 44, 306–319.
10.
BuskP. L.SerlinR. (1992). Meta-analysis for single case research. In KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
ByiersB. J.ReichleJ.SymonsF. J. (2012). Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 397–414.
12.
Carrow-WoolfolkE. (1999). Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language, third edition (TACL-3). Boston, MA: Pro-Ed.
13.
CarusoA. J.StrandE. A. (1999). Clinical management of motor speech disorders in children. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers.
14.
CrosbieS.HolmA.DoddB. (2005). Intervention for children with severe speech disorder: A comparison of two approaches. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 40, 467–491.
15.
DoddB. (2005). Differential diagnosis and treatment of children with speech disorder (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Whurr.
16.
FeyM. E. (1992). Articulation and phonology: Inextricable constructs in speech pathology. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 225–232.
17.
FinestackL. H.PayestehB.Rentmeester DisherJ.JulienH. M. (2014). Reporting child language sampling procedures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 2274–2279.
18.
ForrestK.ElbertM.DinnsenD.A. (2000). The effect of substitution patterns on phonological treatment outcomes. Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 14(7), 519–531.
19.
GiuffridaC. I.SheaJ.FairbrotherJ. T. (2002). Differential transfer benefits of increased practice for constant, blocked, and serial practice schedules. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 34, 353–365.
20.
GoldmanR.FristoeM. (2000). Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
HeskethA.AdamsC.NightingaleC.HallR. (2000). Phonological awareness therapy and articulatory training approaches for children with phonological disorders: A comparative outcome study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 35, 337–354.
23.
HolmA.DoddB. (1999). Differential diagnosis of phonological disorder in two bilingual children acquiring Italian and English. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 13, 113–129.
24.
KnockT.BallardK.RobinD.SchmidtR. A. (2000). Influence of order of stimulus presentation on speech motor learning: A principled approach to treatment of apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 14, 653–668.
25.
KotzéA. E. (1989). An introduction to northern Sotho phonetics and phonology. Cape Town, South Africa: Marius Lubbe Publishers.
26.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc
27.
LeeT. D.MagillR. A.WeeksD. J. (1985). Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 17, 283–299.
28.
LewisB. A.AvrichA. A.SteinC. M. (2011). Subtyping children with speech sound disorders by endophenotypes. Topics in Language Disorders, 31, 112–127.
29.
LousadaM.JesusM. T.CapelasS.MargaçaC.SimõesD.ValenteA.. . . JoffeV. L. (2013). Phonological and articulation treatment approaches in Portuguese children with speech and language impairments: A randomized controlled intervention study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48, 172–187.
30.
MaasE.ButallaE.FarinellaK. A. (2012). Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 561–578.
31.
MaasE.Gildersleeve-NeumannC.JakielskiK.J.StoeckelR. (2014). Motor-based intervention protocols in treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 1(3), 197–206.
32.
MaasE.RobinD.Austermann HulaS. N.FreedmanS.WulfG.BallardK. J.SchmidtR. A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 277–298.
33.
MagillR. A. (2007). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications (8th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
34.
MaphalalaZ.PascoeM.SmouseM. (2014). Phonological development of first language isiXhosa-speaking children aged 3;0-6;0 years: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28, 176–194.
35.
McReynoldsL.ThompsonM. (1986). Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part I: Review of the basics of single-subject designs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 194–203.
36.
MilisenR. (1954). A rationale for articulation disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 4, 5–18.
37.
MillerJ. F. (1981). Assessing language production in children. London, England: Edward Arnold.
38.
PascoeM.RossouwK.FishL.JansenC.ManleyN.PowellM.RosenL. (2016). Speech processing and production in two-year old children acquiring isiXhosa: A tale of two children. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 63(2), e1–e15.
39.
PratherE.HedrickD.KernC. (1975). Articulation development in children aged two to four years. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40, 179–191.
40.
SchmidtR.A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82(4), 225–260.
41.
SchmidtR. A.LeeT. (2011). Motor control and learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Human Kinetics.
42.
SchmidtR. A.WrisbergC. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
43.
SheaC. H.LaiQ.WrightD. L.ImminkM.BlackC. (2001). Consistent and variable practice conditions: Effects on relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 33, 139–152.
44.
SheaC. H.WulfG. (2005). Schema theory: A critical appraisal and re-evaluation. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 37, 85–101.
45.
ShipleyK.McAfeeJ. (2009). Assessment in speech-language pathology: A resource manual (4th ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Cengage Learning.
46.
SkeltonS. L.FunkT. E. (2004). Teaching speech sounds to young children using randomly ordered, variably complex task sequences. Perceptual Motor Skills, 99, 602–604.
47.
TemplinM. (1957). Certain language skills in children: Their development and inter-relationships. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
48.
TheronK.Van der MerweA.RobinD. A.GroenewaldE. (2009). Temporal parameters of speech production in bilingual speakers with apraxic or phonemic paraphrasic errors. Aphasiology, 23, 557–583.
49.
Van der MerweA. (2011). A speech motor learning approach to treating apraxia of speech: Rationale and effects of intervention with an adult with acquired apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 25, 1174–1206.
50.
Van der MerweA.SchmulianD.GroenewaldE. (1997). An exploratory study of an undefined acquired neuromotor speech disorder within the context of the four-level framework for speech sensorimotor control. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 87–97.
51.
Van RiperC. (1978). Speech correction: Principles and methods (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall.
52.
Van RiperC. (1996). Speech correction: An introduction to speech pathology and audiology (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
53.
WambaughJ. L.NesslerC. (2004). Modification of sound production treatment for apraxia of speech: Acquisition and generalization effects. Aphasiology, 18, 407–427.
54.
WellmanR. L.LewisB. A.FreebairnL. A.AvrichA. A.HansenA. J.SteinC. M. (2011). Narrative ability of children with speech sound disorders and the prediction of later literacy skills. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 561–579.
