The components involved in adolescent reading are complex and not clearly understood in struggling readers. Phrase reading, a language skill associated with prosodic understanding of syntactic phrases, has received little attention. We studied 70 adolescent readers including delayed readers to answer the following questions: (a) Do phrase-reading ability, syntactic awareness, passage-reading rate, and reading comprehension have a positive, significant correlation; (b) Do language-related variables (i.e., phrasing ability, syntactic awareness) account for more of the variance in comprehension than passage-reading rate; (c) Does phrase-reading ability, as measured by phrase-level prosody, provide a mechanism for, or at least partially mediate, how passage-reading rate and syntactic awareness affect reading comprehension? Data were analyzed using hierarchical regression and mediation regression. All answers were affirmative suggesting that researchers studying adolescent struggling readers should investigate prosodic phrasing-reading ability as a tool for improving reading comprehension.
AndersonJ. R.LebiereC. J. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1173–1182.
3.
BekenJ. A.WilliamsJ.CombsJ. P.SlateJ. R. (2009). At-risk students at traditional and academic alternative school settings: Differences in math and English performance indicators. Florida Journal of Educational Policy, 3, 49–61.
4.
BenjaminR. G.SchwanenflugelP. J. (2010). Text complexity and oral reading prosody in young readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 388–404.
5.
BenjaminR. G.SchwanenflugelP. J.MeisingerE. B.GroffC.KuhnM. R.SteinerL. (2013). A spectrographically grounded scale for evaluating reading expressiveness. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 105–133.
6.
BennerG. J.MattisonR. E.NelsonJ. R.RalstonN. C. (2009). Types of language disorders in students classified as ED: Prevalence and association with learning disabilities and psychopathology. Education & Treatment of Children, 32, 631–653.
7.
BennerG. J.NelsonJ. R.AllorJ. H.MooneyP.DaiT. (2008). Academic processing speed mediates the influence of both externalizing behavior and language skills on the academic skills of students with emotional disturbance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 63–78. doi:10.1007/s10864-007-9057-7
8.
BennerG. J.NelsonJ. R.RalstonN. C.MooneyP. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of reading instruction on the reading skills of students with or at risk or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 86–102.
9.
BentinS.DeutschA.LibermanI. Y. (1990). Syntactic competence and reading ability in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 147–172.
10.
BlackorbyJ.WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal post school outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the national longitudinal transition study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.
11.
BryanK.FreerJ.FurlongC. (2007). Language and communication difficulties in juvenile offenders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42, 505–520.
12.
CarnieA. (2002). Syntax: A generative introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
13.
Carrow-WoolfolkE. (1999). Comprehensive assessments of spoken language. Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.
14.
CattsH. W.HoganT. P.AdolfS. M. (2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities. In CattsH. W.KamhiA. G. (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 25–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
CattsH. W.HoganT. P.FeyM. E. (2003). Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 151–164. doi:10.1177/002221940303600208
16.
ChomskyC. (1978). When you still can’t read in the third grade: After decoding what? In SamuelsS. J. (Ed.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 13–30). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
17.
CizekG. J. (2003). Test review of the Woodcock-Johnson III. In PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C.SpiesR. A. (Eds.), The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute for Mental Measures.
18.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
19.
CrumptonN. L. (2003). Review of the gray oral reading tests. In PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C.SpiesR. A. (Eds.), The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook (4th ed., pp. 216–218). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
20.
DaaneM. C.CampbellJ. R.GriggW. S.GoodmanM. J.OranjeA. (2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading (NCES 2006-469). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
21.
DanielS.WalshA.GoldstonD.ArnoldE.ReboussinB.WoodF. (2006). Suicidality, school dropout, and reading problems among adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 507–514. doi:10.1177/00222194060390060301
22.
DentonC. A.BarthA. E.FletcherJ. M.WexlerJ.VaughnS.CirinoP. G.FrancisD. J. (2011). The relations among oral and silent reading fluency and comprehension in middle school: Implications for identification and instruction of students with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 109–135.
23.
DentonC. A.VaughnS. (2008). Reading and writing intervention for older students with disabilities: Possibilities and challenges. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 61–62.
24.
DowhowerS. L. (1991). Speaking of prosody: Fluency’s unattended bedfellow. Theory Into Practice, 30, 165–174.
25.
EdmondsM. S.VaughnS.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC.CableA.TackettK. K.SchnakenbergJ. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 71, 262–300. doi:10.3102/0034654308325998
26.
EisenmajerN.RossN.PrattC. (2005). Specificity and characteristics of learning disabilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 1108–1115.
27.
FisherJ.PlanteE.VanceR.GerkenL.GlattkeT. J. (2007). Do children and adults with language impairment recognize prosodic cues?Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 746–758. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/052)
28.
FrazierP.TixA.BarronK. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115
29.
FriesC. C. (1963). Linguistics and reading. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
30.
GoughP. B.HooverW. A.PetersonC. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In CornoldiC.OakhillJ. (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and interventions (pp. 1–13). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
GreenbaumP. E.DedrickR. F.FriendmanR. M.KutashK.BrownE. C.LardierhS. P.PughA. M. (1996). National adolescent and child treatment study (NACTS): Outcomes for children with serious emotional and behavioral disturbance. Journal of Emotional and Behavior Disorders, 4, 130–146.
32.
GriggW. S.DaaneM. C.JinY.CampbellJ. R. (2003). The nation’s report card: Reading 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
33.
HasbrouckJ.TindalG. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59, 636–644. doi:10.1598/RT.59.7.3
34.
HeckelmanR. G. (1969). A neurological impress method of reading instruction. Academic Therapy, 4, 277–282.
35.
HewardW. L. (2006). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
36.
HockM. F.BrasseurI. F.DeshlerD.CattsH. W.MarquisJ. G.MarkC. A.StriblingJ. W. (2009). What is the reading component skill profile of adolescent struggling readers in urban schools?Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 21–38. doi:10.2307/25474660
37.
HooverW. A.GoughP. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799
38.
HuckS. W. (2004). Reading statistics and research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
39.
HudsonR. F.PullenP. C.LaneH. B.TorgesenJ. K. (2009). The complex nature of reading fluency: A multidimensional view. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25, 4–32.
40.
IDEA 2004 Summary. (n.d.). LD OnLine: The world’s leading website on learning disabilities and ADHD. Available from http://www.ldonline.org/
41.
JaffeL. E. (2009). Development, interpretation, and application of the W score and the relative proficiency index (Woodcock-Johnson III Assessment Service Bulletin No. 11). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
42.
JuddC. M.KennyD. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619.
43.
JusczykP. W. (2002). How infants adapt speech-processing capacities to native-language structure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 15–18. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00159
44.
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J. (2009). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
45.
KlammerT.SchulzM. R.VolpeA. D. (2012). Analyzing English grammar (7th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
46.
KlaudaS. L.GuthrieJ. T. (2008). Relationship of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 310–321. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310
47.
KoriatA.GreenbergS. N.KreinerH. (2002). The extraction of structure during reading: Evidence from reading prosody. Memory & Cognition, 30, 270–280. doi:10.3758/BF03213976
48.
KuhnM. R.SchwanenflugelP. J.MeisingerE. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230–251. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.3
49.
KuhnM. R.StahlS. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3–21.
50.
LaBergeD.SamuelsS. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
51.
LaneK. L.GreshamF. M.O’ShaughnessyT. E. (2002). Serving students with or at-risk for emotional and behavior disorders: Future challenges. Education & Treatment of Children, 25, 507–521.
LeeJ.GriggW.DonahueP. (2007). The nation’s report card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007–496). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
54.
LeeM. S. (2009). Contributions of student characteristics that lead to success in alternative learning settings in American public schools (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3360951)
55.
LeVasseurV. M.MacarusoP.ShankweilerD. (2008). Promoting gains in reading fluency: A comparison of three approaches. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 205–230. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9070-1
56.
MacWhinneyB. (2002). Extending the competition model. In HerediaR.AltarribaJ. (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 31–58). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
57.
MannV. A. (2006). Language processes: Keys to reading disability. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 213–228). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
58.
MarshallC. R.Harcourt-BrownS.RamusF.van der LelyH. K. (2009). The link between prosody and language skills in children with specific language impairment (SLI) and/or dyslexia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorder, 44, 466–488. doi:10.1080/13682820802591643
MillerJ.SchwanenflugelP. J. (2006). Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. Journal of Education Psychology, 98, 839–853. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.839
61.
MokhtariK.ThompsonH. B. (2006). How problems of reading fluency and comprehension are related to difficulties in syntactic awareness skills among fifth graders. Reading Research and Instruction, 46, 73–93. doi:10.1080/19388070609558461
62.
MorganJ. L. (1996). Prosody and the roots of parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 69–106.
63.
NelsonJ. R.BennerG. J.CheneyD. (2005). An investigation of the language skills of students with emotional disturbance served in public school settings. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 97–105. doi:10.1177/00224669050390020501
64.
PedhazurE. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (3rd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Thomson Learning.
65.
PerfettiC. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
66.
PinnellG. S.PikulskiJ. J.WixsonK. K.CampbellJ. R.GoughP. B.BeattyA. S. (1995). Listening to children read aloud: Data from NAEP’s integrated reading performance record (IRPR) at grade four (Report No. CS 011970, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED378550). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
67.
PoulsenM.GravgaardA. K. D. (2016). Who did what to whom? The relationship between syntactic aspects of sentence comprehension and text comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 325–338. doi:10.1080/10888438.2016.1180695
68.
RasinskiT. V. (1989). Adult readers’ sensitivity to phrase boundaries in texts. Journal of Experimental Education, 58, 29–40.
69.
RasinskiT. V. (1990). The effects of cued phrase boundaries on reading performance: A review (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED313689). Kent, OH: Kent State University.
70.
RasinskiT. V. (1994). Developing syntactic sensitivity in reading through phrase-cued text. Intervention in School and Clinic, 29, 165–168. doi:10.1177/105345129402900307
71.
RasinskiT. V. (2004). Creating fluency readers. Education Leadership, 61(6), 46–51.
72.
SamuelsS. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403–408.
73.
SchrankF. A.WoodcockR. W. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson III normative update compuscore and profiles program. User’s manual. Rolling Meadows, IL: The Riverside Publishing Company.
74.
SchreiberP. A. (1980). On the acquisition of reading fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 177–186.
75.
SchreiberP. A. (1987). Prosody and structure in children’s syntactic processing. In HorowitzR.SamuelsS. J. (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 243–270). New York, NY: Academic Press.
76.
SchreiberP. A. (1991). Understanding prosody’s role in reading acquisition. Theory Into Practice, 30, 158–164.
77.
SchunkD. H. (2008). Learning theories: An educational perspective (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
78.
SchwanenflugelP. J.BenjaminR. G. (2017). Lexical prosody as an aspect of oral reading fluency. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30, 143–162. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9667-3
79.
SchwanenflugelP. J.HamiltonA. M.KuhnM. R.WisenbakerJ. M.StahlS. A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 119–129. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.119
80.
SchwanenflugelP. J.WestmorelandM. R.BenjaminR. G. (2015). Reading fluency skill and the prosodic marking of linguistic focus. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 9–30. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9456-1
81.
ShaferV. L.ShucardD. W.ShucardJ. L.GerkenL. A. (1998). An electrophysiological study of infants’ sensitivity to the sound patterns of English speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 874–886. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4104.874
82.
ShaywitzS. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
83.
SiegelL. S.RyanE. B. (1988). Development of grammatical-sensitivity, phonological and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and learning disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 24, 28–37. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.1.28
84.
SnowC. E.BurnsM. S.GriffinP. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
85.
SnowD.BalogH. L. (2002). Do children produce the melody before the words? A review of developmental intonation research. The Lingua, 112, 1025–1058. doi:10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00060-8
86.
SnyderK. A. (2003). Review of the comprehensive assessment of spoken language. In PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C.SpiesR. A. (Eds.), The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 216–218). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
87.
SoderstromM.SeidlA.KemlerD. G. K.JusczykP. W. (2003). The prosodic bootstrapping of phrases: Evidence from prelinguistic infants. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 249–267. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00024-X
88.
VellutinoF. R.FletcherJ. M.SnowlingM. J.ScanlonD. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?Journal of Child Psychiatry, 45, 20–40. doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
89.
WexlerJ.VaughnS.EdmondsM.ReutebuchC. K. (2008). A synthesis of fluency interventions for secondary struggling readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 317–347. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9085-7
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
92.
YoungA.BowersP. G. (1995). Individual difference and text difficulty determinants of reading fluency and expressiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 428–454.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
