The purpose of this study was to identify kindergarteners at risk for language and reading disorders and to determine predictors. A representative sample of 311 kindergarteners in general education classrooms in the U.S. Midwest were assessed with the Well Screening in fall, winter, and spring. Groups were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) on measures of memory, phonological awareness, retrieval speed, social communication, and letter knowledge. Children at risk for reading disorders performed most poorly on phonological awareness, whereas children at risk for language disorders struggled most with social communication. Retrieval speed alone was not a reliable predictor of reading risk in kindergarten. High performers scored best on working memory. The high-performing reading group outscored the high-performing language group on letter knowledge. Phonological awareness distinguished the high-performing reading group but not the high-performing language group from their non-high-performing classmates. Early identification of these relevant subgroups allows for early targeted interventions and monitoring of growth.
AdolfS. M. (2020). Promoting reading achievement in children with developmental language disorders: What can we learn from research of specific language impairment and dyslexia?Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(10), 3277–3292. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00118
2.
BoadaR.WillcuttE. G.PenningtonB. F. (2012). Understanding the comorbidity between dyslexia and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Topics in Language Disorders, 32(3), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e31826203ac
3.
Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. (2010). Reaching for breakthroughs with science-based innovation. https://developingchild.harvard.edu
4.
Conti-RamsdenG.DurkinK.MokP. L. H.ToseebU.BottingN. (2016). Health, employment, and relationships: Correlates of personal wellbeing in young adults with and without a history of childhood language impairment. Social Science and Medicine, 160, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.014
5.
CoyneM. D.LittleM.RawlinsonD.SimmonsD.KwokO.KimM.SimmonsL.Hagan-BurkeS.CivetelliC. (2013). Replicating the impact of a supplemental beginning reading intervention: The role of instructional context. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2012.706694
6.
CrookeP. J.WinnerM. G.OlswangL. B. (2016). Thinking socially: Teaching social knowledge to foster social behavioral change. Topics in Language Disorders, 36(3), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000094
7.
DakinK. E.ErenbergG. (2005). About attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and dyslexia. International Dyslexia Association.
8.
EhriL. C.DreyerL. G.FlugmanB.GrossA. (2007). Reading rescue: An effective tutoring intervention model for language-minority students who are struggling readers in first grade. American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 414–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207302175
9.
EkelmanB. L.DutkaD. A.St AmourK. (2015). The Well Screening. Bolster Learning Systems. www.wellscreening.com
10.
EkelmanB. L.DutkaD. A.St AmourK. (2021) The Well Screening Examiner’s Manual. Paul H. Brookes.
11.
EkelmanB. L.LewisB. A. (2019). Speech and language disorders. In BatshawM. L.RoizenN. J.PellegrinoL. (Eds.), Children with disabilities (8th ed., pp. 301–313). Paul H. Brookes.
12.
FoormanB. R.ChenD. T.CarlsonC.MoatsL.FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M. (2003). The necessity of the alphabetic principle to phonemic awareness instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 289–324. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10236717021
13.
FoormanB. R.FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.SchatschneiderC.MehtaP. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.37
14.
HebbelerK.SpikerD.BaileyD.ScarboroughA.MalikS.SimeonssonR.SingerM.NelsonL. (2007). Early intervention for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families; participants, services, and outcomes [Final report of the National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study]. SRI International.
15.
IBM Corp. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows (Version 27.0). IBM Corporation.
KaderavekJ. N. (2011). Language disorders in children: Fundamental concepts of assessment and intervention. Pearson.
18.
LervagA.HulmeC. (2009). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psychological Science, 20(8), 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02405.x
19.
LyonsR.RoulstoneS. (2018). Well-being and resilience in children with speech and language disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61, 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0391
20.
MoatsL. C. (2007). Whole-language high jinks: How to tell when “scientifically-based research” isn’t. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
21.
MoatsL. C. (2020). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers (3rd ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
22.
MokP. L. H.PicklesA.DurkinK.Conti-RamsdenG. (2014). Longitudinal trajectories of peer relations in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(5), 516–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12190
23.
MuellerK. L.TomblinJ. B. (2012). Examining the comorbidity of language disorders and ADHD. Topics in Language Disorders, 32(3), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318262010d
24.
MurphyK. A.JusticeL. M.O’ConnellA. A.PentimontiJ. M.KaderavekJ. N. (2016). Understanding risk for reading difficulties in children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(6), 1436–1447. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0110
25.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
26.
OwensR. E.Jr. (2014). Language disorders: A functional approach to assessment and intervention (6th ed.). Pearson.
27.
Ozernov-PalchikO.NortonE. S.SideridisG.BeachS. D.WolfM.GabrieliJ. D. E.GaabN. (2017). Longitudinal stability of pre-reading skill profiles of kindergarten children: Implications for early screening and theories of reading. Developmental Science, 20(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12471
28.
Pence TurnbullK. L.JusticeL. M. (2017). Language development from theory to practice (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
29.
RameyS. L.RameyC. T.LanziR. G. (2007). Early intervention: Background, research findings, and future directions. In JacobsonJ. W.MulickJ. A.RojahnJ. (Eds.), Handbook of intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 445–463). Springer.
30.
RollinsP. R. (2016). Words are not enough: Providing the context for social communication and interaction. Topics in Language Disorders, 36(3), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000095
31.
SchueleM. C.BoudreauD. (2008). Phonological awareness intervention: Beyond the basics. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/002)
32.
ShaywitzS. (2003). Overcoming Dyslexia. Alfred A. Knopf.
33.
SnowC. E.BurnsM. S.GriffinP. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.
34.
St ClairM. C.PicklesA.DurkinK.Conti-RamsdenG. (2011). A longitudinal study of behavioral, emotional and social difficulties in individuals with a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Communication Disorders, 44(2), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.09.004
35.
TomblinJ. B.RecordsN.BuckwalterP.ZhangX.SmithE.O’BrienM. (1997). Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1245–1260. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4006.1245
36.
TorgesenJ. K.MathesP. G. (2000). A basic guide to understanding, assessing, and teaching phonological awareness. Pro-Ed.
37.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(5), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949402700503
38.
TridasE. Q. (2007). From ABC to ADHD: What parents should know about dyslexia and attention problems. International Dyslexia Association.
VellutinoF. R.FletcherJ. M.SnowlingM. J.ScanlonD. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
41.
WiigE. H.SecordW. A.SemelE. (2013). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals: Fifth Edition Screening Test. Pearson.
42.
WilliamsP. G.LernerA. A. P., Council on Early Childhood, & Council on School Health. (2019). School readiness. Pediatrics, 144(2), Article e20191766. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1766
43.
WolfM.BowersP. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.415
44.
WolfM.O’BrienB.AdamsK.JoffeT.JeffreyJ.LovettM.MorrisR. (2003). Working for time: Reflections on naming speed, reading fluency, and intervention. In FoormanB. R. (Ed.), Preventing and remediating difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 355–379). Pro-Ed.
45.
ZimmermanI. L.SteinerV. G.PondR. A. (2012). Preschool Language Scales: Fifth Edition Screening Test. Pearson.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
