The purpose of this study was to assess the basic psychometric properties of a progress-monitoring tool designed to measure narrative discourse skills in school-age children with language impairments (LI). A sample of 109 children with LI between the ages of 5 years 7 months and 9 years 9 months completed the Test of Narrative Language (TNL). The stories told in response to the alien picture prompt were transcribed and scored according to the TNL manual criteria and the criteria established for scoring the progress-monitoring tool, Monitoring Indicators of Scholarly Language (MISL). The MISL total score demonstrated acceptable levels of internal consistency reliability, inter-rater reliability, and construct validity for use as a progress-monitoring tool for specific aspects of narrative proficiency. The MISL holds promise as a tool for tracking growth in narrative language proficiency that may be taught as part of an intervention program to support the Common Core Standards related to literacy.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2000). Guidelines for the roles and responsibilities of the school-based speech-language pathologist. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy
4.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2001). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to reading and writing in children and adolescents [Position statement]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy
5.
BensonS. (2009). Understanding literate language: Developmental and clinical issues. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 36, 174–178.
6.
BermanR. (1988). On the ability to relate events in narrative. Discourse Processes, 11, 469–497.
7.
BrackenB. A.McCallumR. S. (1998). The Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
8.
BrieschR.VolpeR. (2007). Selecting progress monitoring tools for evaluating social behavior. School Psychology Forum, 1, 59-74.
9.
Carrow-WoolfolkE. (1999). Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance service.
10.
CrottyB.GillamS. (2015a, June3). Content and form in the narratives of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in two elicitation contexts: Implications for Assessment and Instruction. Poster presentation presented to the Symposium on Child Language Disorders, Madison, WI.
11.
CrottyB.GillamS. (2015b, November). Content and form in the narratives of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in two elicitation contexts: Implications for Assessment and Instruction. Technical session presented to the American Speech Language and Hearing Convention, Denver, CO.
12.
EhrenB.WhitmireK. (2009). Speech-language pathologists as primary contributors to response to intervention at the secondary level. Seminars in Speech and Language, 30, 90–104.
13.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
14.
GillamR. B.PearsonN. (2004). Test of narrative language. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
15.
GillamS.GillamR. (2006). Making evidence-based decisions about child language intervention in schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 1–12.
16.
GillamS.GillamR.LaingC. (2012). Supporting knowledge in language and literacy (SKILL): A narrative intervention program. Logan: Utah State University.
GillamS.OlszewskiA.FargoJ.GillamR. (2014). Classroom-based narrative and vocabulary instruction: Results of an early-stage, nonrandomized comparison study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45, 204–219.
19.
GreenhalghK.StrongC. (2001). Literate language features in spoken narratives of children with typical language and children with language impairments. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 114–125.
20.
HatcherL. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS® system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
21.
HeilmannJ.MillerJ.NockertsA.DunawayC. (2010). Properties of the narrative scoring scheme using narrative retells in young school-age children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 154–166.
22.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
23.
JusticeL. M. (Ed.). (2006). Clinical approaches to emergent literacy intervention. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
24.
JusticeL. M.BowlesR.EisenbergS. L.KaderavekJ. N.UkrainetzT. A.GillamR. B. (2006). The index of narrative micro-structure (INMIS): A clinical tool for analyzing school-aged children’s narrative performance. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 177–191.
25.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (1990). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
26.
LilesB. Z.DuffyR. J.MerrittD. D.PurcellS. L. (1995). Measurement of narrative discourse ability in children with language disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 415–425.
27.
LobanW. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
28.
LuegerR.BarkhamM. (2010). Using benchmarks and benchmarking to improve quality of practice and service. In BarkhamM.HardyG. E.Mellor-ClarkJ. (Eds.), Practice-based evidence: A guide for psychological therapies (pp. 223-256). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
29.
MillerJ. F.AndriacchiK.NockertsA. (2011). Assessing language production using SALT Software: A clinician’s guide to language sample analysis. Middleton, WI: SALT Software.
30.
MillerJ. F.ChapmanR. S. (2004). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT, v8.0) [Computer software and manual]. Madison: Language Analysis Laboratory, Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
31.
National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2011, October27). Common Core State Standards initiative. Available from www.corestandards.org
32.
NewcomerP. L.HammillD. D. (1997). Test of Language Development-Primary: Third edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
33.
NippoldM. (1998). Later language development: The school-age and adolescent years (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
34.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
35.
PaulD.HasselkusA. (2004). Clinical record-keeping in speech-language pathology for healthcare and third-party payers. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
36.
PaulR. (1995). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Assessment and intervention. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
37.
PaulR. (2007). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). St Louis, MO: Mosby.
38.
PetersenD.GillamS.GillamR. (2008). Emerging procedures in narrative assessment: The index of narrative complexity. Topics in Language Disorders, 28, 111–126.
39.
SemelE.WiigE.SecordW. (2004). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (CELF-4). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
40.
SquiresK. E.Lugo-NerisM.PenaE.BedoreL.BohmanT.GillamR. (2014). Story retelling by bilingual children with language impairments and typically developing controls. International Journal of Communication Disorders, 49, 60–74.
41.
SteinN. L. (1988). The development of children’s storytelling skill. In FranklinM. B.BartenS. S. (Eds.), Child language: A reader (pp. 282–297). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
SteinN. L.GlennC. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In FreedleR. O. (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing: Advances in discourse processing (Vol. 2, pp. 53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
TomblinB.RecordsN.BuckwalterP.ZhangX.SmithE.O’BrienE. (1997). Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1245–1260.
45.
van den BroekP.LinzieB.FletcherC.MarsolekC. (2000). The role of causal discourse structure in narrative writing. Memory & Cognition, 28, 711–721.
46.
WarrenS.FeyM.YoderP. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication intervention. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 70–77.
47.
WestbyC. E. (1985). Learning to talk—Talking to learn: Oral literate language differences. In SimonC. S. (Ed.), Communication skills and classroom success: Therapy methodologies for language-learning disabled students (pp. 181–213). San Diego, CA: College-Hill.
48.
WestbyC. E. (2005). Assessing and facilitating text comprehension problems. In CattsH.KamhiA. (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (pp. 157–232). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
49.
WhiteM.van den BroekP.KendeouP. (2007, April). Comprehension and basic language skills predict future reading ability: A cross-sectional study of young children. Symposium paper presentation at the Society for Research on Child Developments Biennial Conference, Boston, MA.
50.
YuC.-Y.MuthénB. (2002, April). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
