The purpose of this survey was to examine Speech-Language Pathologists’ (SLPs) confidence in their ability to support student outcomes by addressing language-literacy needs, to align therapy to educational standards, and to align therapy to student content areas. A total of 237 school-based SLPs in Virginia completed a 19-item survey. Results indicated school-based SLPs were largely unfamiliar with the concept of disciplinary literacy and only 53% of the respondents indicated that they were “Very confident” or “Somewhat confident” in their ability to align their therapy to students’ content areas. Confidence level was found to be negatively correlated with SLPs’ experience level (rs = −.14–−.24, p < .05) and positively correlated with their rating of their education (rs = .28–.39, p < .01). These results suggest school-based SLPs could benefit from professional development in the area of disciplinary literacy as well as the broader area of adolescent language and literacy interventions.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2010). Roles and responsibilities of speech language pathologists in schools: Professional issues statement. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy
2.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2017). ASHA summary membership and affiliation counts, year-end 2016. Available from www.asha.org
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
4.
BennettS. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs, knowledge, and implementation of disciplinary literacy pedagogy in three advanced placement United States history classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Tampa.
5.
BermanI.BiancarosaG. (2005). Reading to achieve: A governor’s guide to adolescent literacy. Washington, DC: NGA Center for Best Practices.
6.
BiancarosaC.SnowC. E. (2006). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
7.
BloodG. W.MamettC.GordonR.BloodI. M. (2010). Written language disorders: Speech-language pathologists’ training, knowledge, and confidence. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 416–428. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2009/09-0032)
8.
ButlerD. L.Novak LauscherH.Jarvis-SelingerS.BeckinghamB. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 435–455. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.003
9.
CasbyM. (1988). Speech-language pathologists’ attitudes and involvement regarding language and reading. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 19, 352–361.
10.
CervettiG.PearsonP. D. (2012). Reading, writing, and thinking like a scientist. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 55, 580–586.
11.
DavisK. (2014). Comprehension of science text by African American fifth and sixth grade students: The effects of a metalinguistic approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, Orlando.
12.
DillmanD. (2006). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method 2007 update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
13.
DobbsC. L.IppolitoJ.Charner-LairdM. (2017). Investigating disciplinary literacy: A framework for collaborative professional learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
14.
DuffM. C.StuckS. (2014). Paediatric concussion: Knowledge and practices of school speech-language pathologists. Brain Injury, 29, 64–77. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.965747
15.
EhrenB. J. (2002). Speech-language pathologists contributing significantly to the academic success of high school students: A vision of professional growth. Topics in Language Disorders, 22(2), 60–80.
16.
EhrenB. J.LittleM. E. (2014). High School Inclusion for the 21st Century. In McLeskyJ.WaldronN.SpinnerF.AlgozzineB. (Eds.), Handbook of effective inclusive schools: Research and practice (pp. 322–335). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
17.
EhrenB. J.MurzaK. A.MalaniM. (2012). Disciplinary literacy from a speech-language pathologist’s perspective. Topics in Language Disorders, 32, 85–98.
18.
Elish-PiperL.L’AllierS. K.Manderino DomenicoM. (2016). Collaborative coaching for disciplinary literacy: Strategies to support teachers in grades 6–12. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
FangZ. (2012a). The challenges of reading disciplinary texts. In JettonT. L.ShanahanC. (Eds.), Adolescent literacy in the academic disciplines (pp. 34–68). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
20.
FangZ. (2012b). Approaches to developing content area literacies: A synthesis and critique. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56, 103–108. doi:10.1002/JAAL.00110
21.
FangZ. (2014). Preparing content area teachers for disciplinary literacy instruction: The role of literacy teacher educators. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57, 444–448. doi:10.1002/JAAL.269
22.
FangZ.SchleppegrellM. J. (2008). Reading in the secondary content areas: A language-based pedagogy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23.
FarquharsonK.TambyrajaS. R.LoganJ.JusticeL. M.SchmittM. B. (2015). Using hierarchical linear modeling to examine how individual SLPs differentially contribute to children’s language and literacy gains in public schools. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24, 504–516.
24.
GoddardR.HoyW.HoyA. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 479–507. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1163531
25.
HutchinsT. L.GeretyK. W.MulliganM. (2011). Dysphagia management: A survey of school-based speech-language pathologists in Vermont. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 194–206.
JacksonR. R.LambertC. (2010). How to support struggling students: Mastering the principles of great teaching series. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
28.
MojeE. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy. In ParkerL. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 31, pp. 1–44). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Education.
29.
MurzaK. A.MalaniM. D.Hahs-VaughnD. L. (2014). Using the Common Core State Standards to guide therapy in the schools: Confidently accepting the challenge. Perspectives on School-based Issues, 15, 125–133. doi:10.1044/sbi15.4.125
30.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2015). The reading framework for the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: Author.
31.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
32.
NippoldM. A.MansfieldT. C.BillowJ. L.TomblinJ. B. (2008). Expository discourse in adolescents with language impairments: Examining syntactic development. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 17, 356–366. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0049)
33.
O’BrienD. G.MojeE. B.StewartR. A. (2001). Exploring the contexts of secondary and adolescent literacy: Literacy in people’s everyday school lives. In MojeE. B.O’BrienD. (Eds.), Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools (pp. 27–48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
PavelkoS. L.OwensR. E.IrelandM.Hahs-VaughnD. L. (2016). Use of language sample analysis by school-based SLPs: Results of a nationwide survey. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 47, 246–258.
35.
PlumbA. M.PlexicoL. W. (2013). Autism spectrum disorders: Experience, training, and confidence levels of school-based speech-language pathologists. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 89–104.
36.
SangerD.HuxK.GriessK. (1995). Educators’ opinions about speech-language pathology services in schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 26, 75–85.
37.
ScarboroughH. (1990). Index of productive syntax (IPSyn). Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 1–22.
38.
SchleppegrellM. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
ShanahanC. (2015). Literacy practices that adolescents deserve: Disciplinary literacy strategies in content areas classes. International Literacy Association Essentials. doi:10.1598/e-ssentials.8069
ShanahanT.ShanahanC. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter?Topics in Language Disorders, 32, 7–18.
42.
ShaughnessyA.SangerD. (2005). Kindergarten teachers’ perceptions of language and literacy development, speech-language pathologists, and language intervention. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 26, 67–110.
43.
SnowC. E.MojeE. B. (2010). What is adolescent literacy? Why is everyone talking about it now?Phi Delta Kappa, 91(6), 66–69.
44.
TetenA. F.DeVeneyS. L.FrieheM. J. (2016). Voice disorder management competencies: A survey of school-based speech-language pathologists in Nebraska. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 47, 31–43.
45.
Tschannen-MoranM.HoyA. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching & Teacher Education, 23, 944–956.
46.
Virginia Department of Education. (2010). Comparison of Virginia’s 2010 English Standards of Learning with the Common Core State Standards for English and Literacy. Richmond, VA: Author.
47.
Virginia Department of Education. (2011). Comparison of Virginia’s 2009 Mathematics Standards of Learning with Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Richmond, VA: Author.
48.
Zygouris-CoeV. (2012). Disciplinary literacy and the Common Core State Standards. Topics in Language Disorders, 32, 35–50.
