The article outlines the methodology used in an ethnographic study of identity with teenagers who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). It is unusual to investigate this population in naturalistic contexts using qualitative methods. Nine individuals are studied, in a range of contexts using ethnography as the main method. The research draws on theory from childhood and disability studies to gain a broad picture of the participants’ lives. The aim was to explore the teenagers’ views of their lives while also contextualizing these with perspectives of people around them and three adult AAC users. The method enabled the researcher to see the many ways in which disabled teenagers experience their worlds. The study shows that they are more interested in the ways that they are like others than anything else and that they identify themselves most importantly as teenagers rather than as disabled.
Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. ( 2004). Ethics, social research and consulting with children and young people. Barkingside, UK: Barnardos.
2.
Allan, M. ( 2005). The culture of AAC. Retrieved September 10, 2009, from http://www.e-bility.com/arataconf/papers/doc/allan.doc
3.
Barnes, C. ( 2003). What a difference a decade makes: Reflections on doing emancipatory disability research. Disability and Society, 18, 3-17.
4.
Bazeley, P. ( 2007). Doing qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: Sage.
5.
Berresford, B. ( 1997). Personal accounts: Involving disabled children in research . London: Stationary Office.
6.
Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. ( 1998). Augmentative and alternative communication. London: Paul Brookes.
7.
Blackstone, S., Hunt Berg, M., & Wilkins, D. ( 2003). Social networks: A communication inventory for individuals with complex communication needs and their communication partners . Retrieved September 23, 2009, from www.augcominc.com/socialnetworks.html.
8.
Blackstone, S.W., Williams, M.B., & Wilkins, D.P. ( 2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC . Alternative and Augmentative Communication,23, 191-203.
9.
Bohanek, J.G., Marin, K.A., & Fivush, R. ( 2008). Family narratives, self and gender in early adolescence . Journal of Early Adolescence, 28, 153-176.
10.
Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. ( 2000). Beyond identity. Theory and Society , 29, 1-47.
11.
Christensen, P.H. ( 2004). Children’s participation in ethnographic research; issues of power and representation. Children and Society, 18, 165-176.
12.
Christensen, P.H., & James, A. ( 2000). (Eds.). Research with children: Perspectives and practices . London: Falmer.
13.
Clifford, J. ( 1983). On ethnographic authority. Representations , 2, 118-146.
14.
Coffey, A. ( 1999). The ethnographic self: Fieldwork and the representation of identity. London: Sage.
15.
Cohen, A.P. ( 1994). Self-consciousness: An alternative anthropology of identity . London: Routledge .
16.
Corsaro, W. ( 1997). The sociology of childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
17.
Csordas, T. (Ed.). (1994). Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and self. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Davis, J.M. ( 1998). Understanding the meanings of children: A reflexive process . Children and Society,12, 325-335.
19.
Davis, J., Watson, N., & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2003). Learning the lives of disabled children: Developing a reflexive approach. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (pp. 201-224). London: Routledge Falmer.
20.
Dowling, M. ( 2006). From Husserl to van Manen: A review of different phenomenological approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 131-142.
21.
Geertz, C. ( 1993). The interpretation of cultures. London : Fontana Press.
22.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. ( 1995). Ethnography. London: Routledge.
23.
Hill, M. ( 2006). Children’s voices on ways of having a voice: Children’s and young people’s perspectives on methods in research and consultation . Childhood, 13, 69-89.
24.
Hill, M., Davis, J., Prout, A., & Tisdall, K. ( 2004). Moving the participation agenda forward. Children and Society, 18, 77-96.
25.
Hockey, J. ( 2002). Interviews as ethnography? Disembodied social interaction in Britain. In N. Rapport (Ed.), British subjects (pp. 209-222). London: Routledge.
26.
Hodge, N. ( 2008). Evaluating life world as an emancipatory methodology . Disability and Society, 23, 29-40.
27.
James, A. ( 2007). Giving voice to children’s voices: Practices and problems, pitfalls and potentials. American Anthropologist , 109, 261-272.
28.
James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. ( 1998). Theorizing childhood. Oxford , UK: Polity.
29.
Jans, M. ( 2004). Children as citizens: Towards a contemporary notion of child participation. Childhood, 11, 27-42.
30.
Jenkins, R. ( 2004). Social identity (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
31.
Mead, G.H. ( 1934). Mind self and society. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
32.
Merleau-Ponty, M. ( 1962). Phenomenology of perception. London : Routledge.
33.
Morris, J. ( 1998). Don’t leave us out-Involving disabled children and young people with communication impairments. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
34.
Morris, J. ( 2003). Including all children: Finding out about the experience of children with communication and/or cognitive impairments. Children and Society, 17, 337-348.
35.
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. ( 1996). Narrating the self. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 19-43.
36.
Oliver, M. ( 1992). Changing the social relations of research production? Disability, Handicap and Society, 7, 101-114.
37.
Oliver, M. ( 1996). Defining impairment and disability: Issues at stake. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Exploring the divide (pp. 29-54). Leeds , UK: The Disability Press.
38.
Parr, S., Byng, S., Gilpin, S., & Ireland, C. ( 1997). Talking about aphasia: Living with loss of language after stroke. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
39.
Pennington, L., & McConachie, H. (1999). Mother-child interaction revisited: Communication with non-speaking physically disabled children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorder, 34, 391-416.
40.
Punch, S. ( 2000). Research with children, the same or different from research with adults. Childhood, 9, 321-341.
41.
Priestley, M. ( 1998). Childhood disability and disabled childhoods: Agendas for research. Childhood, 5, 207-223.
42.
Qvortrup, J. ( 1994). Childhood matters: Social theory, practice and politics . Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing .
43.
Rabiee, P., Sloper, P., & Beresford, B. ( 2005). Doing research with children and young people who do not use speech for communication. Children and Society , 19, 385-396.
44.
Robinson, C., & Stalker, K. (Eds.). (1999). Growing up with a disability . London: Jessica Kingsley.
45.
Roberts, B. ( 2002). Biographical research. Buckingham , UK: Open University Press.
46.
Schutz, A. ( 1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
47.
Shakespeare, T. ( 1994). Cultural representation of disabled people: Dustbins of disavowal? Disability & Society, 9, 283-299.
48.
Shakespeare, T. ( 1996a). Disability, identity and difference. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Exploring the divide (pp. 94-113). Leeds , UK: The Disability Press.
49.
Shakespeare, T. ( 1996b). Rules of engagement: Doing disability research . Disability and Society, 11, 115-119.
50.
Shakespeare, T., Priestley, M., & Barnes, C. ( 2000). Life as a disabled child: A qualitative study of young people’s experiences and perspective. Retrieved January 11, 2009, from http://www.hull.ac.uk/children5to16programme/briefings/shakespeare.pdf
51.
Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. ( 1999). Theoretical perspectives on research with disabled children . In C. Robinson & K. Stalker (Eds.), Growing up with a disability (pp. 13-28). London: Jessica Kingsley.
52.
Silverman, D. ( 2004). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice . London: Sage.
53.
Swain, J., Finkelstein, V., French, S., & Oliver, M. (Eds.). (1993). Disabling barriers: Enabling environments. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
54.
Swain, J., & French, S. ( 2000). Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability and Society, 15, 569-582.
55.
Thomas, C. ( 1999). Narrative identity and the disabled self. In M. Corker & S. French (Eds.), Disability discourse (pp. 47-55). Buckingham , UK: Open University Press.
56.
Tisdall, K., & Davis, J. ( 2004). Making a difference?: Bringing children’s and young people’s view into policy making. Children and Society , 18, 131-142.
57.
Watson, N. ( 2002). Well I know this is going to sound very strange to you but I don’t see myself as a disabled person: Identity and disability . Disability and Society, 17, 509-527.
58.
Zarb, G. ( 1992). On the road to Damascus: First steps towards changing the relations of disability research production. Disability Handicap and Society, 7, 125-138.
