Speech-language pathologists are faced with demands for evidence to support practice. Federal legislation requires high-quality evidence for decisions regarding school-based services as part of evidence-based practice. The purpose of this article is to discuss the limited scientific evidence for making appropriate decisions about speech-language services for children and adolescents in schools, to identify factors that have contributed to this situation, and to present options for enhancing the depth and breadth of the evidence base.
AlexanderA. W.AndersenH. G.HeilmanP. C.VoellerK. K. S.TorgesenJ. K. (1991). Phonological awareness training and remediation of analytic decoding deficits in a group of severe dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 193–206.
2.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2001). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to reading and writing in children and adolescents [Guidelines]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy
3.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004a). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders: An introduction [Technical Report]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2010). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists in schools [Position Statement]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy
AramD.NationJ. E. (1980). Preschool language disorders and subsequent language and academic difficulties. Journal of Communication Disorders, 13, 159–270.
8.
AugustD.ShanahanT. (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national panel on language minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
BeilinsonJ. S.OlswangL. B. (2003). Facilitating peer-group entry in kindergartners with impairments in social communication. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 15, 154–166.
10.
BlackburnD. W.BonvillianJ. D.AshbyR. P. (1984). Manual communication as an alternative mode of language instruction for children with severe reading disabilities. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 15, 22–31.
11.
BrackenburyT.BurroughsI.HewittL. (2008). A qualitative examination of current guidelines for evidence-based practice in child-language intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 78–88.
12.
BuggeyT. (2005). Video self-modeling applications with students with autism spectrum ‘disorder in small private school setting. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 52–63.
13.
CattsH. W. (1993). The relationship between speech-language impairments and reading disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 948–958.
14.
CattsH. W.FeyM. F.TomblinJ. B.ZhangX. (2002). A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1142–1157.
CirrinF.GillamR. (2008). Language intervention practices for school-aged children with spoken-language disorders: A systemic review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, S110–S137.
17.
CirrinF.SchoolingT.NelsonN.DiehlS.FlynnP.StaskowskiM.. . . AdamczykD. (2010). Evidence-based systematic review: Effects of different service delivery models on communication outcomes for elementary school-aged children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 233–264.
18.
Conti-RamsdenG.DurkinK. (2012). Postschool educational and employment experiences of young people with specific language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43, 507–520.
19.
CroftA.CoggshallJ. G.DolanM.PowersE.KillionJ. (2010). Job-embedded professional development: What it is, who is responsible, and how to get it done well. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89737/1/lsschill_1.pdf
DoddB. (2007). Evidence-based practice and speech-language pathology: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 59, 119–129.
22.
EhrenB. J. (2008). Making informed decisions about literacy interventions in schools: An adolescent literacy example. EBP Briefs, 3, 1–11.
23.
EhriL. C.SatlowE.GaskinsI. (2009). Grapho-phonemic enrichment strengthens keyword analogy instruction for struggling young readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25, 162–191.
24.
FeyM.FinestackL. (2009). Research and development in child-language intervention: A five-phase model. In SchwartzR. G. (Ed.), Handbook of child language disorders (pp. 513–529). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
25.
Friel-PattiS.DesBarresK.ThibodeauL. (2001). Case studies of children using Fast ForWord. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 203–215.
26.
GallagherT.SwigertN.BaumH. (1998). Collecting outcomes data in schools: Needs and challenges. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 250–256.
27.
GanzJ. B.FloresM. M. (2009). The effectiveness of direct instruction for teaching language to children with autism spectrum disorders: Identifying materials. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 75–83.
28.
GanzJ. B.ParkerR.BensonJ. (2009). Impact of the picture exchange communication system: Effects on communication and collateral effects on maladaptive behaviors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 250–261.
29.
GerberS.BriceA.CaponeN.FujikiM.TimlerG. (2011). Language use in social interactions of school-aged children with language impairments: An evidence-based systematic review of treatment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43, 235–249.
30.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of2004. Retrieved from www.idea.ed.gov
JusticeL. M.FeyM. E. (2004, September 21). Evidence-based practice in schools: Integrating craft and theory with science and data. The ASHA Leader, pp. 4–5, 30–32. Retrieved from www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2004/040921/f040921a.htm
33.
KeeganL. C. (2012, Fall). Review of research methods in communication disorders. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 39, 98–104.
34.
LiberD. B.FreaW. D.SymonJ. B. G. (2008). Using time-delay to improve social play skills with peers for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 312–323.
35.
MarscharkM.RhotenC.FabichM. (2007). Effects of cochlear implants on children’s reading and academic achievement. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12, 269–282. Available from http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org
36.
McArthurG. M.HogbenJ. H.EdwardsV. T.HeathS. M.MenglerE. D. (2000). On the “specifics” of specific reading disability and specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 869–874.
37.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2008). Adolescent literacy and older students with learning disabilities [Technical Report]. Available from www.asha.org/policy
38.
OlsenL.AisnerD.McGinnisJ. (2007). Institute of medicine roundtable on evidence-based medicine: The learning healthcare system, workshop summary. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
39.
O’TooleT.LogemannJ.BaumH. (1998). Conducting clinical trials in the public schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 257–262.
40.
PaezM.TaborsP.LopezL. (2007). Dual language and literacy development of Spanish-speaking preschool children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 85–102.
41.
ParadisJ.GeneseeF.CragoM. (2011). Dual language development and disorders: A handbook on bilingualism and second language learning (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
42.
PenningtonB. F.BishopD. V. M. (2009). Relations among speech, language, and reading disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 283–306.
43.
RatnerN. B. (2006). Evidence-based practice: An examination of its ramifications for the practice of speech-language pathology. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 257–267.
44.
ReschlyD. (1996). Identification and assessment of students with disabilities. The Future of Children, 6, 40–53. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1602493
45.
RichardsonK.Klecan-AkerJ. S. (2000). Teaching pragmatics to language-learning disabled children: A treatment outcome study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 16, 23–42.
46.
RothF. P.SpeeceD. L.CooperD. H. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of the connection between oral language and early reading. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 259–272.
47.
RothF. P.WorthingtonC. K. (2011). Treatment resource manual for speech-language pathology (4th ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Learning.
48.
SkibbeL. E.GrimmK. J.Stanton-ChapmanT. L.JusticeL.PenceK. L.BowlesR. P. (2008). Reading trajectories of children with language difficulties from preschool through fifth grade. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in schools, 39, 475–486.
49.
SlocumT. A.SpencerT. D.DetrichR. (2012). Best available evidence: Three complementary approaches. Education & Treatment of Children, 35, 153–181.
50.
SmythK. F.SchorrL. B. (2009). A lot to lose: A call to rethink what constitutes “evidence” in finding social interventions that work (Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy Working Paper Series). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
51.
SpencerT. D.DetrichR.SlocumT. A. (2012). Evidence-based practice: A framework for making effective decisions. Education & Treatment of Children, 35, 127–151.
52.
SpiraE. G.BrackenS. S.FischelJ. E. (2005). Predicting improvement after first-grade reading difficulties: The effects of oral language, emergent literacy, and behavior skills. Developmental Psychology, 41, 225–234.
53.
StorchS. A.WhitehurstG. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947.
54.
SundbergM. L.EndicottK.EigenheerP. (2000). Using intraverbal prompts to establish tacts for children with autism. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17, 89–104.
55.
TomblinB. J.ZhangX.BuckwalterP.CattsH. (2000). The association of reading disability, behavioral disorders, and language impairment among second-grade children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 473–482.
56.
United States Government Accountability Office. (2009). Program evaluation: A variety of rigorous methods can help identify effective interventions. Available from www.gao.gov/new.items/d1030.pdf
57.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Private schools: A brief portrait, NCES 2002–013. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002013.pdf
58.
van KleeckA.GilliamR. B.HoffmanL. M. (2006). Training in phonological awareness generalizes to phonological working memory: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Speech and Language Pathology and Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 58–74.
59.
van KleeckA.GilliamR. B.McFaddenT. U. (1998). A study of classroom-based phonological awareness training for preschoolers with speech and/or language disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 7, 65–76.
60.
WolkeD.SamaraM.BracewellM.MarlowN. (2008). Specific language difficulties and school achievement in children born at 25 weeks of gestation or less. Journal of Pediatrics, 152, 256–262. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347607006506
61.
WorrallJ. (2007). Evidence in medicine and evidence-based medicine. Philosophy Compass, 2, 981–1022.
