Children with little or no functional speech are at risk for literacy acquisition. Assessment of early literacy skills is particularly challenging among this population due to the need for children to provide a spoken response to tasks. This study explored the effects of adapted response modes on measures of phonological sensitivity. Assessment tasks were administered in three response conditions to 12 typically developing kindergarten students with 4 participants in each response condition. Identical tasks were administered in the speech response condition, speech response condition combined with picture response arrays, and nonspeech response condition whereby participants pointed to answers on picture response arrays. Results revealed no statistically significant differences in scores across the three response conditions for 11 of 12 tasks, suggesting that nonspeech assessment of phonological sensitivity should continue to be explored as a feasible option for use among individuals with little or no functional speech.
AnthonyJ. L.LoniganC. J.DriscollK.PhillipsB. M.BurgessS. R. (2003). Phonological sensitivity: A quasi-parallel progression of word structure units and cognitive operations. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 470–487.
2.
BadianN. A. (1995). Predicting reading ability over the long term: The changing roles of letter naming, phonological awareness and orthographic processing. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 79–96.
3.
BadianN. A. (1998). A validation of the role of preschool phonological and orthographic skills in the prediction of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 472–481.
4.
BadianN. A. (2001). Phonological and orthographic processing: Their roles in reading prediction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 179–202.
5.
BarschR. H.RudellB. (1962). A study of reading development among 77 children with cerebral palsy. Cerebral Palsy Review, 23(2), 3–12.
6.
BerningerV. W.GansB. M. (1986). Language profiles in nonspeaking individuals of normal intelligence with severe cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 45–50.
7.
BlischakD. M. (1994). Phonologic awareness: Implications for individuals with little or no functional speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 245–254.
8.
BlischakD. M. (1995). Effects of using aided AAC methods on assessment and instruction outcomes of rhyming accuracy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
9.
BradleyL.BryantP. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.
10.
BradleyL.BryantP. E. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling (International Academy for Research in Learning Disabilities Monograph Series No. 1). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11.
BurgessS. R.LoniganC. J. (1998). Bidirectional relations of phonological sensitivity and prereading abilities: Evidence from a preschool sample. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 117–141.
12.
ByrneB.Fielding-BarnsleyR. (1993). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 104–111.
13.
CalfeeR. C.LindamoodP.LindamoodC. (1973). Acoustic-phonetic skill and reading—Kindergarten through twelfth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 293–298.
14.
CaseyM.TonsingK. M.AlantE. (2007). Comparison of a non-spoken response mode and a spoken response mode in a test of phonological awareness. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37(3), 25–28.
15.
ClendonS.GillonG.YoderD. (2005). Initial insights into phoneme awareness intervention for children with complex communication needs. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 52(1), 7–31.
16.
DormanC. (1987). Verbal, perceptual and intellectual factors associated with reading achievement in adolescents with cerebral palsy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 671–678.
17.
EhriL. (1984). How orthography alters spoken language competencies in children learning to read and spell. In DowningJ.ValtinR. (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read (pp. 119–147). New York: Springer-Verlag.
18.
EhriL. (1985). Effects of printed language acquisition on speech. In OlsonD.TorranceN.HildyardA. (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning (pp. 333–367). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
FallonK. A.LightJ.McNaughtonD.DragerK.HammerC. (2004). The effects of direct instruction on the single-word reading skills of children who require augmentative and alternative communication needs. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1424–1439.
20.
FoleyB. E.PollatsekA. (1999). Phonological processing and reading abilities in adolescents and adults with severe congenital speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 156–173.
21.
GoswamiU.BryantP. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. East Sussex, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
HellerK. W.FredrickL. D.DiggsC. A. (1999). Teaching reading to students with severe speech and physical impairments using the Nonverbal Reading Approach. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 18, 3–34.
23.
HigginbothamD. J. (1995). Use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 2–5.
24.
HigginbothamD. J.BedrosianJ. L. (1995). Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 11–13.
25.
HitchG. J.HallidayM. S.SchaafstalA. M.HeffernanT. M. (1991). Speech, “inner speech,” and the development of short-term memory: Effects of picture-labeling on recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 220–234.
26.
IaconoT.CupplesL. (2004). Assessment of phonemic awareness and word reading skills of people with complex communication needs. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 437–449.
27.
JohnsonR. (1994). The Picture Communication Symbols Combination. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co.
28.
JohnstonS. S.DavenportL.KanarowskiB.RhodehouseS.McDonnellA. P. (2009). Teaching sound letter correspondence and consonant-vowel-consonant combinations to young children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 123–135.
29.
KoppenhaverD. A.EvansD. A.YoderD. E. (1991). Childhood reading and writing experiences of literate adults with severe speech and motor impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 20–33.
30.
KoppenhaverD. A.HendrixM. A.WilliamsA. R. (2007). Toward evidence-based literacy interventions for children with severe and multiple disabilities. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28(1), 79–88.
31.
LloydL. L.FullerD. R.ArvidsonH. H. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
McBride-ChangC. (1995). What is phonological awareness?Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 179–192.
33.
McClureK. K.FerreiraF.BisanzG. L. (1996). Effects of grade, syllable segmentation, and speed of presentation on children’s word-blending ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 670–681.
34.
MoraisJ. (1991). Metaphonological abilities and literacy. In SnowlingM.ThompsonM. (Eds.), Dyslexia: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 93–107). London: Whurr Publishers.
35.
NationK.HulmeC. (1997). Phonemic segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation, predicts early reading and spelling skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 154–167.
36.
PeetersM.VerhoevenL.de MoorJ.van BalkomH. (2009). Importance of speech production for phonological awareness and word decoding: The case of children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(4), 712–726.
37.
PierceP. L.McWilliamP. J. (1993). Emerging literacy and children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): Issues and possible intervention strategies. Topics in Language Disorders, 13(2), 47–57.
38.
PufpaffL. A. (2009). A developmental continuum of phonological sensitivity skills. Psychology in the Schools, 46(7), 679–691.
39.
SandbergA. D.HjelmquistE. (1996). Phonologic awareness and literacy abilities in nonspeaking preschool children with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 138–153.
40.
SchlosserR. W.BlischakD. M.BelfioreP. J.BartleyC.BarnettN. (1998). Effects of synthetic speech output and orthographic feedback on spelling in a student with autism: A preliminary study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28(4), 309–319.
41.
SeymourP.H.K.EvansH. M. (1994). Levels of phonological awareness and learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 221–250.
42.
SmithM. M. (1989). Reading without speech: A study of children with cerebral palsy. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 10(4), 601–614.
43.
SmithM. M. (1992). Reading abilities of nonspeaking students: Two case studies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 57–66.
44.
StahlS. A.MurrayB. A. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 221–234.
45.
StanovichK. E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading acquisition. In GoughR. B.EhriL. C.TreimanR. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 307–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46.
StanovichK. E.CunninghamA. E.CramerB. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175–190.
47.
TruxlerJ. E.O’KeefeB. M. (2007). The effects of phonological awareness instruction on beginning word recognition and spelling. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(2), 164–176.
48.
VanderveldenM. C.SiegelL. S. (1999). Phonological processing and literacy in AAC users and students with motor speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 191–211.
49.
VanderveldenM. C.SiegelL. S. (2001). Phonological processing in written word learning: Assessment for children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 37–51.
50.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 73–87.
51.
YoppH. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159–178.
