Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Masters-level speech-language pathologists in communication sciences and disorders (n = 122) completed a survey soliciting their reasons for not pursuing doctoral study. Factor analysis revealed a four-factor solution including one reflecting a lack of interest in doctoral study (Factor 2) and one reflecting practical financial concerns (Factor 3). Not surprisingly, those who did (31%) and did not (69%) seriously consider a PhD differed on Factor 2 items in the expected direction. Descriptive analyses revealed that the top two reasons cited for not pursuing the doctoral degree (i.e., a preexisting high level of satisfaction with professional goals and masters degree) were the same for both groups. Beyond that, Factor 2 items dominated the top reasons among those who never considered a PhD, whereas Factor 3 items were the top reasons among those who did consider a PhD. Implications, limitations, and directions for future research are considered.

Keywords

speech-language pathology survey doctoral degree PhD research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2007). Asha’s focused initiative on the PhD shortage in higher education.

Retrieved December, 2009

from http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/leader/2008/080325/ShortageAccomplishments.pdf

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2008). Report on the occupations of ASHA-certified clinicians holding the Ph.D. Rockville, MD: Author.

Boswell

(2001 November 20). Where Have all the Ph.D.’s gone? The ASHA Leader Online.

Busacco

(1999). Issues for students to consider in evaluating the benefits of pursuing doctoral education in communication sciences and disorders. Contemporary Issues in Communication Sciences and Disorders, 26, 14-22.

Council of Graduate Schools. (2008). Ph.D. completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline demographic data from the Ph.D. Completion Project. Retrieved November 11, 2008, from www.phdcompletion.org.

Dawes

(2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50, 61-77.

FinAid. (2008). Student loans. Retrieved November 11, 2008, from http://www.finaid.org/loans/.

Hull

Coufal

(2009, June 16). An innovative approach to the PhD shortage. The ASHA Leader, 14(8), 28-30.

Koenigsknecht

(1983). Issue III: What is the need for a professional doctorate in communicative disorders? ASHA Reports Series, 13, 38-49.

10.

Madison

Guy

Koch

(2004). Pursuit of the speech- language pathology doctorate: Who, why, why not. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 31, 191-199.

11.

Nunnally

(1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Oller

D. K.

Scott

Goldstein

(2002). PhD program survey results. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.asha.org/students/academic/doctoral/phd_survey_sum.htm

13.

Ringel

(2004, February 3). In search of teacher/scholars: Consortia model offers one perspective on the current doctoral shortage. The ASHA Leader, pp. 4-5, 20-21.

14.

Scott

Wilcox

(2002). The PhD in CSD. The ASHA Leader Online. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2002/021119/021119f.htm

15.

Zipoli

R. P.

Kennedy

(2005). Evidence-based practice among speech-language pathologists: Attitudes, utilization, and barriers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(3), 208-220.

Understanding Why Speech-Language Pathologists Rarely Pursue a PhD in Communication Sciences and Disorders

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References