The aim of the present study was to determine whether latent class analysis (LCA) could obtain a measure of the aggregate firearm transfer law environment. LCA, analysis of variance, and multinomial logistic regression were used to analyze state-level firearm transfer laws. Results indicated that a three-class solution fit the data better than a two- or four-class solution. These classes were associated with the two covariates in patterns consistent with hypotheses. Results suggest that LCA is a useful technique for classifying states based on the restrictiveness of firearm transfer laws. This classification may be useful in intervention and prevention planning.
AnestisM.KhazemL.LawK.HoutsmaC.LeTardR.MobergF.MartinR. (2015). The association between state laws regulating handgun ownership and statewide suicide rates. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 2059–2067.
2.
AzraelD.CookP. J.MillerM. (2004). State and local prevalence of firearm ownership: Measurement, structure, and trends. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20, 43–62.
3.
BlocherJ. (2013). Firearm localism. The Yale Law Journal, 123, 82–146.
4.
BoorM.BlairJ. (1990). Suicide rates, handgun control laws, and sociodemographic variables. Psychological Reports, 66, 923–930.
5.
BragaA. A.CookP. J.KennedyD. M.MooreM. H. (2002). The illegal supply of firearms. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 29, 319–347.
6.
BurrisS.AndersonE. (2013). Legal regulation of health-related behavior: A half century of public health law research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 9, 95–117.
7.
CollinsL.FidlerP.WugalterS.LongJ. (1993). Goodness-of-fit testing for latent class models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 375–389.
8.
ConnerK.ZhongY. (2003). State firearm laws and rates of suicide in men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25, 320–324.
9.
FleeglerE.LeeM.MonuteauxM.HemmenwayD.MannixR. (2013). Firearm legislation and firearm-related fatalities in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association—Internal Medicine, 173, 743–740.
10.
GieselM.RollR.WettickR. (1969). The effectiveness of state and local regulation of handguns: A statistical analysis. Duke Law Journal, 18, 647–676.
11.
GiusM. (2015). The impact of minimum age and child access prevention laws on firearm-related youth suicides and unintentional deaths. The Social Science Journal, 52, 168–175.
12.
HahnR.BilukhaO.CrosbyA.FulliloveM. T.LibermanA.MoscickiE.,…Task Force on Community Preventive Services. (2005). Firearms laws and the reduction of violence: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 40–71.
13.
Institute of Medicine (IOM) and National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Priorities for research to reduce the threat of firearm-related violence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
14.
KalesanB.MobilyM.KeiserO.FaganJ.GaleaS. (2016). Firearm legislation and firearm mortality in the USA: A cross-sectional, state-level study. The Lancet, 387, 1847–1855.
15.
KalesanB.VillarealM.KeyesK.GaleaS. (2016). Gun ownership and social gun culture. Injury Prevention, 22, 216–220
16.
KaufmanE.MorrisonC.BranasC.WiebeD. (2018). State firearm laws and interstate firearm deaths from homicide and suicide in the United States: A cross-sectional analysis of data by county. Journal of the American Medical Association—Internal Medicine, 178, 692–700.
17.
KleckG.KovandzicT.BellowsJ. (2016). Does gun control reduce violent crime?Criminal Justice Review, 41, 488–513.
18.
KleckG.PattersonB. (1993). The impact of gun control and gun ownership levels on violence rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 249–287.
19.
LesterD.MurrellM. (1986). The influence of gun control laws on personal violence. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 315–318.
20.
LudwigJ.CookP. (2000). Homicide and suicide rates associated with implementation of the Brady Handgun violence prevention act. Journal of the American Medical Association, 248, 585–591.
21.
MedoffM.MagaddinoJ. (1983). Suicides and firearm control laws. Evaluation Review, 7, 357–372.
22.
MuellerD. G.FrandsenR.LouxT.KarbergJ.DursoJ. (2018). Enforcement of firearm transfer laws: The association between behavioral prohibitor laws and firearm background check denials. Behavioral Sciences and the Law. Under review.
23.
MuthenL.MuthenB. (2003). Modeling with categorical latent variables using Mplus. Los Angeles: University of California.
24.
NylundK.AsparouhovT.MuthenB. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.
25.
PapudopolisF.SkalkidouA.SergentanisT.KyllekidisS.EkselisuL.PetridouE. (2009). Preventing suicide and homicide in the United States: The potential benefit in human lives. Psychiatry Research, 169, 154–158.
26.
ParkerK.HorowitzJ.IgielnikR.OliphantB.BrownA. (2017). America’s complex relationship with guns: An in-depth look at the attitude and experiences of U.S. adults. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
RuddellR.MaysL. (2005). State background checks and firearm homicides. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 127–136.
30.
RudolphK.StuartE.VernickJ.WebsterD. (2015). Association between Connecticut’s permit-to-purchase handgun law and homicides. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 49–54.
31.
SiegelM.PahnM.XuanZ.RossC. S.GaleaS.KalesanB.…GossK. A. (2017). Firearm-related laws in all 50 US states, 1991-2016. American Journal of Public Health, 107, 1122–1129.
32.
SumnerS.LaydeP.GuseC. (2008). Firearm death rates and association with level of firearm purchase background check. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 1–6.
33.
SwansonJ. W.RobertsonA. G.FrismanL. K.NorkoM. A.LinH. J.SwartzM. S.CookP. J. (2013). Preventing gun violence involving people with serious mental illness. In WebsterD. W.VernickJ. S. (Eds.), Reducing gun violence in America: Informing policy with evidence and analysis (pp. 33–51). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
TekleF. B.GudichaD. W.VermuntJ. K. (2016). Power analysis for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test for the number of classes in latent class models. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 10, 209–224.
VigdorE.MercyJ. (2006). Do laws restricting access to firearms by domestic violence offenders prevent intimate partner homicides?Evaluation Review, 30, 313–346.
37.
VriniotisM.BarberC.FrankE.DemiccoR., & New Hampshire Firearm Safety Coalition. (2015). A suicide prevention campaign for firearm dealers in New Hampshire. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior, 45, 157–163.
38.
WebsterD.CrifasiC.VernickJ. (2014). Effects of the repeal of Missouri’s handgun purchaser licensing law on homicides. Journal of Urban Health, 91, 293–302.
39.
WintemuteG. (2013). Responding to the crisis of firearm violence in the United States: Comment on “Firearm legislation and firearm-related fatalities in the United States.”Journal of the American Medical Association—Internal Medicine, 173, 740–742.
40.
WrightM.WintemuteG.RivaraF. (1999). Effectiveness of denial of handgun purchase to persons believed to be at high risk for firearm violence. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 88–90.
41.
WurptsI. C.GeiserC. (2014). Is adding more indicators to a latent class analysis beneficial or detrimental? Results of a Monte-Carlo study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 920.
42.
ZeoliA. M.WebsterD. W. (2010). Effects of domestic violence policies, alcohol taxes and police staffing levels on intimate partner homicide in large US cities. Injury Prevention, 16, 90–95.
