The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) has been a repository for crime data for almost 25 years. This work explores the uses and applications of these data to shed light on a variety of crime and policing issues since the data became available in the early to mid 1990s. Specific attention and discussion is devoted to some of the advances that NIBRS data affords as well as some of the limitations that have been discovered. Documenting both the challenges and opportunities that NIBRS data have provided was the aim of this work. Both the research and practice communities can profit from further data collection and analysis of this important source of information relative to crimes that become known to the police.
AddingtonL. A. (2007). Hot vs. cold cases: Examining time to clearance for homicides using NIBRS data. Justice Research and Policy, 9, 87–112.
2.
AddingtonL. A. (2013). Reporting and clearance of cyberbullying incidents applying “offline” theories to online victims. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 29, 454–474.
3.
AddingtonL. A.RennisonC. M. (2008). Co-occurring rape: Do additional crimes affect how victims and police respond to rape?Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 205–226.
4.
AkiyamaY.NolanJ. (1999). Methods for understanding and analyzing NIBRS data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 225–238.
5.
BidermanA. D.LynchJ. P. (1991). Understanding crime incidence statistics: Why the UCR diverges from the NCS. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
6.
ChiltonR. (2015). Trends in NIBRS drug arrest rates and homicide victimization, 1995 to 2012 (pp. 8–17). Clearwater, FL: Homicide Research Working Group Annual Meeting Program.
7.
ChiltonR.JarvisJ. (1999a). Using National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) to test estimates of arrestee and offender characteristics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 207–229.
8.
ChiltonR.JarvisJ. (1999b). Victims and offenders in two crime statistics programs: A comparison of the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) and the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 193–205.
9.
ChiltonR.RegoecziW. (2007). Impact of employment, family structure, and income on NIBRS offense, victim, offender, and arrest rates. Justice Research and Policy, 9, 9–29.
10.
ChuL. D.KrausJ. F. (2004). Predicting fatal assault among the elderly using the National Incident-Based Reporting System crime data. Homicide Studies, 8, 71–95.
11.
CliffordJ.TetzlaffM.JarvisJ.Huff-CorzineL.CorzineH.WeaverG. (2015). Fatal factors for preschoolers: Victims, offenders, and context. Forthcoming Journal of Homicide Studies, Spring 2015.
12.
D’AlessioS. J.StolzenbergL. (2003). Race and the probability of arrest. Social Forces, 81, 1381–1397.
13.
D’AlessioS. J.StolzenbergL.EitleD. (2002). The effect of racial threat on interracial and intraracial crimes. Social Science Research, 31, 392–408.
14.
DunnC. S.ZelenockT. J. (1999). NIBRS data available for secondary analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 239–248.
15.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1992). Uniform crime reporting handbook: NIBRS Edition. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
16.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1999). Incidents of Family Violence: An Analysis of NIBRS data. In Crime in United States (pp. 277–289). Washington DC, USA: Department of Justice.
17.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2000). National incident-based reporting system volume 1: Data collection guidelines, August, 2000 edition: Uniform Crime Reporting Program. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
18.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2001). National incident-based reporting system volume 2: Data submission specifications. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
19.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2014). Crime in the United States 2013. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
20.
FinkelhorD.OrmrodR. (2000). Characteristics of crimes against juveniles [Juvenile Justice Bulletin]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
21.
FinkelhorD.OrmrodR. (2001). Child abuse reported to the police [Juvenile Justice Bulletin]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
22.
HassS.JefferisE.JarvisJ.TurlyE. (2007). Gun availability and crime in West Virginia: An examination of NIBRS data. Justice Research and Public Policy, 9, 139–160.
23.
Huff-CorzineL.McCutcheonJ.CorzineJ.JarvisJ.Tetzlaff-BemillerM.WellerM.LandonM. (2014). Shooting for accuracy: NIBRS data and mass homicide events. Journal of Homicide Studies, 18, 105–124.
24.
JarvisJ. P.RegoecziW. C. (2009). Homicides clearances: An analysis of arrest versus exceptional outcomes. Homicide Studies, 13, 174–188.
25.
LoftinC. (1986). The validity of robbery-murder classifications in Baltimore. Violence and Victims, 1, 191–204.
26.
LynchJ. P.AddingtonL. A. (2007). Understanding crime incidence statistics: Revisiting the divergence of the NCVS and the UCR. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
MaxfieldM. (1999). The National-Incident Based Reporting System: Research and policy implications. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 119–149.
28.
RegoecziW.WendyC.JarvisJohn P. (2013). Beyond the Social Production of Homicide Rates: Extending Social Disorganization Theory to Explain Homicide Case OutcomesJustice Quarterly, 30, 983–1014.
29.
ReidelM.BoulahanisJ. (2007). Homicides exceptionally cleared and cleared by arrest: An exploratory study of police/prosecutor outcomes. Journal of Homicide Studies, 11, 151–164.
30.
RobertsA. (2007). Predictors of homicide clearance by arrest: An event history analysis of NIBRS incidents. Journal of Homicide Studies, 11, 82–93.
31.
SchwartzJ.Conover-WilliamsM.ClemonsK. (2015). Thirty years of sex stratification in violent crime partnerships and groups. Feminist Criminology, 10, 60–91.
32.
SnyderH. N. (1999). The overrepresentation of juvenile crime proportions in robbery clearance statistics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 151–161.
33.
SnyderH. N. (2000). Sexual assaults of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident, and offender characteristics. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
34.
StolzenbergL.D’AlessioS. J. (2000). Gun availability and violent crime: New evidence from the National Incident-based Reporting System. Social Forces, 78, 1461–1482.
35.
StromK. J. (2001). Hate crimes reported in NIBRS, 1997-1999 (Report no. NCJ186765). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
36.
ThompsonM. P.SaltzmanL. E.BibelD. (1999). Applying NIBRS data to the study of intimate partner violence: Massachusetts as a case study. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 163–180.
37.
WeaverG.WittekindJ.Huff-CorzineL.CorzineJ.PeteeT.JarvisJ. (2004). Violent encounters: A criminal event analysis of lethal and nonlethal outcomes. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20, 348–368.
