Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among low-income uninsured Hispanics in El Paso, Texas. Method: Participants 50 to 75 years old who were due for screening, were uninsured, and had a Texas address were randomized to promotora, video, or promotora and video interventions. High-risk participants were offered colonoscopy, while others were offered fecal immunochemical testing. A nonintervention comparison group was recruited from a similar Texas U.S.–Mexico border county. Screening was determined at 6 months postintervention. Resources were tracked prospectively to determine cost. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were assessed with “intention to treat” methods. Uncertainty in the estimates was analyzed with sensitivity analysis and nonparametric bootstrap methods. Results: The interventions achieved screening rates of between 75% and 87% compared to 10% in the comparison group. The cost per participant ranged from $72 for group sessions to $93 for individual video sessions with video and promotora. The group video sessions cost $104 per additional person screened. Conclusion: The CRC screening interventions were effective for increasing CRC screening. Compared to the experience in the control county, the group-based video-only intervention was the most cost-effective CRC screening promotion intervention.
AndersenM. R.HagerM.SuC.UrbanN. (2002). Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Health Education & Behavior, 29, 755-770.
5.
AragonesA.SchwartzM. D.ShahN. R.GanyF. M. (2010). A randomized controlled trial of a multilevel intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among Latino immigrants in a primary care facility. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25, 564-567.
6.
BakerD. W.BrownT.BuchananD. R.WellJ.BalsleyK.RanalliL.. . . WolfM. S. (2014). Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Medicine, 174, 1235-1241.
7.
BriggsA.WonderlingD.MooneyC. (1997). Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: A non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health Economics, 6, 327-340.
CampbellM. K.JamesA.HudsonM. A.CarrC.JacksonE.OakesV.. . . TessaroI. (2004). Improving multiple behaviors for colorectal cancer prevention among African American church members. Health Psychology, 23, 492-502.
10.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 62, 881-888.
11.
ChirikosT. N.ChristmanL. K.HunterS.RoetzheimR. G. (2004). Cost-effectiveness of an intervention to increase cancer screening in primary care settings. Preventive Medicine, 39, 230-238.
12.
ChurchT. R.YeazelM. W.JonesR. M.KochevarL. K.WattG. D.MonginS. J.. . . EngelhardD. (2004). A randomized trial of direct mailing of fecal occult blood tests to increase colorectal cancer screenings. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96, 770-780.
13.
CoronadoG.GolovatyI.LongtonG.LevyL.JimenezR. (2011). Effectiveness of a clinical-based colorectal cancer screening promotion program for underserved Hispanics. Cancer, 117, 1745-1754.
14.
DietrichA.TobinJ.CassellsA.RobinsonC. M.GreeneM. A.SoxC. H.. . . YoungR. G. (2006). Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144, 563-571.
15.
FernándezM. E.SavasL. S.CarmackC. C.ChanW.LairsonD. R.ByrdT. L.. . . VernonS. W. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of two interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among Hispanics on the Texas–Mexico border. Cancer Causes & Control, 26, 1-10.
16.
FreedmanJ. D.MitchellC. K. (1994). A simple strategy to improve patient adherence to outpatient fecal occult blood testing. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 9, 462-464.
17.
GellerB. M.SkellyJ. M.DorwaldtA. L.HoweK. D.DanaG. S.FlynnB. S. (2008). Increasing patient/physician communications about colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care practices. Medical Care, 46(9Suppl. 1), S36-S43.
18.
GuptaS.HalmE. A.RockeyD. C.HammonsM.KochM.. . . SkinnerG. S. (2013). Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Medicine, 173, 1725-1732.
19.
JandorfL.GutierrezY.LopezJ.ChristieJ.ItzkowitzS. H. (2005). Use of a patient navigator to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban neighborhood health clinic. Journal of Urban Health, 82, 216-224.
20.
KhankariK.EderM.OsbornC. Y.MakoulG.ClaymanM.SkripkauskasS.. . . WolfM. S. (2007). Improving colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved: A pilot study within a federally qualified health center. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1410-1414.
LairsonD. R.ChangY. C.ByrdT. L.Lee SmithJ.FernandezM. E.WilsonK. M. (2014). Cervical cancer screening with AMIGAS: A cost-effectiveness analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46, 617-623.
23.
LairsonD. R.DiCarloM.DeshmukA. A.FaganH. B.SifriR.KaturakesN.. . . MyersE. E. (2014). Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care. Cancer, 120, 1042-1049.
24.
LairsonD. R.MisraS.HuangD.ChanW.VernonS. W.FernandezM. E. (2016). Cost effectiveness of lay health worker delivered interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: A randomized trial. Journal of Healthcare Communications, 1(1), 7.
25.
LarkeyL. (2006). Las mujeres saludables: Reaching Latinas for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer prevention and screening. Journal of Community Health, 31, 69-77.
26.
LarkeyL. K.GonzalezJ. (2007). Storytelling for promoting colorectal cancer prevention and early detection among Latinos. Patient Education and Counselling, 67, 272-278.
27.
LarkeyL. K.HermanP. M.RoeD. J.GarciaF.LopezA.GonzalezJ.. . . SabodaK. (2012). A cancer screening intervention for underserved Latina women by lay educators. Journal of Women’s Health (Larchmt), 21, 557-566.
28.
MyersR. E.SifriR.HyslopT.RosenthalM.VernonS. W.CocroftJ.. . . WenderR. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer, 110, 2083-2091.
29.
O’BrienB.BriggsA. (2002) Analysis of uncertainty in health care cost-effectiveness studies: An introduction to statistical issues and methods. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 11, 455-468.
30.
Percac-LimaS.GrantR. W.GreenA. T.AshburnerJ. M.GambaG.OoS.. . . AtlasS. J. (2009). A culturally tailored navigator program for colorectal cancer screening in a community health center: a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24, 211-217.
31.
PollackL. A.BlackmanD. K.WilsonK. M.SeeffL. C.NadelM. R. (2006). Colorectal cancer test use among Hispanic and non-Hispanic U.S. populations. Preventing Chronic Disease, 3, A50.
32.
ProchaskaJ.ReddingC.EversK. (2002). The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In GlanzK.LewisC. E.RimerB. K. (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (3rd ed., pp. 99-120). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
SabatinoS. A.LawrenceB.ElderR.MercerS. L.WilsonK. M.DeVinneyB.. . . GlanzK. (2012). Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers: Nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43, 97-118.
34.
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance. (2014). Screening can prevent more than 90 percent of colon cancer cases. So why are only 63 percent of Americans having colonoscopies? Retrieved from http://www.seattlecca.org/node/619
35.
SequistT. D.ZaslavskyA. M.MarshallR.FletcherR. H.AyanianJ. Z. (2009). Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169, 364-371.
36.
SharafR.LadabaumU. (2012). Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 108, 120-132.
37.
SheskinD. (1997). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
38.
ShokarN. K.ByrdT.LairsonD. R.SalaizR.KimJ.Calderon-MoraJ.. . . OrtizM. (2015). Against Colorectal Cancer in Our Neighborhoods, a community-based colorectal cancer screening program targeting low-income Hispanics: Program development and costs. Health Promotion Practice, 16, 656-666.
39.
ShokarN. K.ByrdT.SalaizR.FloresS.ChaparroM.Calderon-MoraJ.. . . DwivediA. (2016). Against Colorectal Cancer in Our Neighborhoods (ACCION): A comprehensive community-wide colorectal cancer screening intervention for the uninsured in a predominantly Hispanic community. Preventive Medicine, 91, 273-280.
40.
SobhaniI.AlzahouriK.GhoutI.CharlesD. J.Durand-ZaleskiI. (2011). Cost-effectiveness of mass screening for colorectal cancer: Choice of fecal occult blood test and screening strategy. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 54, 876-886.
41.
StokamerC. L.TennerC. T.ChaudhuriJ.VazquezE.BiniE. J. (2005). Randomized controlled trial of the impact of intensive patient education on compliance with fecal occult blood testing. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20, 278-282.
42.
UrbanN.SelfS.KesslerL.PrenticeR.HendersonM.IversonD.GoldmanS. (1990). Analysis of the costs of a large prevention trial. Controlled Clinical Trials, 11, 129-146.
43.
VannessD. J.KnudsenA. B.Lansdorp-VogelaarI.RutterC. M.GareenI. F.HermanB. A.. . . JohnsonC. D. (2011). Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations. Radiology, 261, 487-498.
44.
WalshJ. M.SalazarR.NguyenT. T.KaplanC.NguyenL. K.HwangJ.. . . PasickR. J. (2010). Healthy Colon, Healthy Life: A novel colorectal cancer screening intervention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39, 1-14.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
