To prepare for pandemics, countries are creating pandemic preparedness plans. These plans frequently include crisis communication strategies that recommend conducting pre-crisis audience research to increase the effectiveness and relevance of communication with the public. To begin understanding the communication needs of the public and health care workers, 11 focus groups were conducted in Vancouver, Canada, in 2006 and 2007 to identify what information people want to receive and how they want to receive it. In the event of a pandemic, participants want to know their risk of infection and how sick they could become if infected. To make decisions about using vaccines and drugs, they want information that enables them to assess the risks of using the products. The public prefers to receive this information from family doctors, the Internet, and schools. Health care workers prefer to receive information in e-mails and in-services.
AmaratungaC.O’SullivanT. (2006). In the path of disasters: Psychosocial issues for preparedness, response, and recovery. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 21, 149-155.
2.
BusseJ. W.MorganL.CampbellJ. B. (2005). Chiropractic antivaccination arguments. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 28, 367-373.
3.
CamererC. (2003). Behavior game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
ClarkL. (1993). Gender and generation in poor women’s household health production experiences. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 7, 386-402.
5.
CovelloV. T. (2003). Best practices in public health risk and crisis communication. Journal of Health Communication, 8(3, Suppl. 1), 5-8.
6.
ErnstE. (2002). Rise in popularity of complementary and alternative medicine: Reasons and consequences for vaccination. Vaccine, 20, S90-S93.
7.
FrewerL. (2004). The public and effective risk communication. Toxicology Letters, 149, 391-397.
8.
GlanzK.RimerB. K.LewisF. M. (Eds.). (2002). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
9.
GlikD. (2007). Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 33-54.
HenrichJ. (2008). A cultural species. In BrownM. (Ed.), Explaining culture scientifically (pp. 184-210). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
12.
HenrichN.HenrichJ. (2007). Why humans cooperate: A cultural and evolutionary explanation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
HibbardJ.PopeC. (1987). Women’s roles, interest in health and health behavior. Women’s Health, 12, 67-84.
14.
KrewskiD.LemyreL.TurnerM.LeeJ.DallaireC.BouchardL.BrandK.MercierP. (2006). Public perception of population health risks in Canada: Health hazards and sources of information. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 12, 626-644.
15.
KrosnickJ. A.AlwinD. F. (1989). Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 416-425.
16.
LivingstonG.MinushkinS.CohnD. (2008). Hispanics and healthcare in the United States: Access, information and knowledge. A Pew Hispanic Center and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Research Report. Retrieved from http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/91.pdf
17.
MaG.ShiveS.ToubbehJ.TanY.WuD. (2008). Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Chinese Hepatitis B screening and vaccination. American Journal of Health Behavior, 32, 178-187.
MeredithL.EisenmanD.RhodesH.RyanG.LongA. (2007). Trust influences response to public health messages during a bioterrorist event. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 217-232.
20.
MohantyS.WoolhandlerS.HimmelsteinD.PatiS.CarrasquilloO.BorD. (2005). Health care expenditures of immigrants in the United States: A nationally representative analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1431-1438.
21.
PasupathiM. (1999). Age differences in response to conformity pressure for emotional and nonemotional material. Psychology and Aging, 14, 170-174.
22.
PetersonR. A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450-461.
RuttenL. F.MoserR. P.BeckjordE. B.HesseB. W.CroyleR. T. (2007). Cancer communication: Health information national trends survey. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute. Retrieved from http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/aug2007/nci-29.htm
26.
SandmanP. (2002). Smallpox vaccination: some risk communication linchpins. The Peter Sandman Risk Communication Web site. Retrieved from http://www.psandman.com/col/smallpox.htm#4
27.
SandmanP. (2003, April). Four kinds of risk communication. The Synergist: Journal of the American Industrial Hygiene Association, pp. 26-27.
28.
SandmanP.LanardJ. (2004). Pandemic influenza risk communication: The teachable moment. The Peter Sandman Risk Communication Web site. Retrieved from http://www.psandman.com/col/pandemic.htm
29.
SchmidtK.ErnstE. (2003). MMR vaccination advice over the Internet. Vaccine, 21, 1044-1047.
30.
ShahrabaniS.BenzionU. (2006). The effects of socioeconomic factors on the decision to be vaccinated: The case of flu shot vaccination. Israel Medical Association Journal, 8, 630-634.
ThompsonA.FaithK.GibsonJ.UpshurR. (2006). Pandemic influenza preparedness: An ethical framework to guide decision-making. BMC Medical Ethics, 7(12).
33.
UpshurR.FaithK.GibsonJ.ThompsonA.TracyS.WilsonK.. (2007). Ethics in an epidemic: Ethical considerations in preparedness planning for pandemic influenza. Health Law Review, 16, 33-39.
34.
VanderfordM. (2004). Breaking new ground in WMD risk communication: The pre-event message development project. Biosecurity Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice and Science, 2, 193-194.
35.
VuckovicN. (2000). Effect of “Time Famine” on women’s self-care and household health care. The Permanente Journal, 4(3), 13-20.
36.
WebsterP. (2004). Canada strengthens pandemic plan in wake of SARS. The Lancet, 363(9409), 628.
WrayR.RiversJ.WhitworthA.JupkaK.ClementsB. (2006). Public perceptions about trust in emergency risk communication: Qualitative research findings. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 24, 45-75.
