The tracking of public opinion can be a critical component of antitobacco campaigns, such as efforts to enact citywide Clean Indoor Air legislation. Grassroots tobacco control coalitions that work locally to promote smoke-free environments typically encompass individuals from a wide range of public health fields. Although knowledgeable, volunteer groups lack the financial resources to evaluate the impact of local efforts or determine their community's level of support for potential legislation. The steps taken by a grassroots organization to conduct a public opinion survey are outlined, including methodological, analytical issues, and resource requirements. A valid survey can be completed in 4 months with minimal financial resources. Individuals willing to voluntarily administer and analyze a survey can be identified at the local level. Results of a tobaccorelated public opinion survey can be instrumental in the promotion of smoke-free environments and an effective tool in attracting media coverage.
Ali, D. (2003, February 8). Group hopes to snuff out restaurant smoke.Dayton Daily News. Retrieved July 9, 2004, from http://www.daytondailynews.com
2.
American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods. (1998.)ASA series: What is a survey? What is a margin of error? Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/whatsurvey.html
3.
Arizona Department of Health Services. (2000).1999 Arizona Adult Tobacco Survey report. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.tepp.org/evaluation/index.html
4.
Belcher, E. (2003, August 31). Smokefree everyplace coming eventually.Dayton Daily News. Retrieved July 8, 2004, from http://www.daytondailynews.com
5.
Biener, L., & Roman, A. M. (1998).Massachusetts Adult Tobacco Survey: Technical report & tables. Boston: Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.state.ma.us/dph/mtcp/report/mats.htm
6.
California Department of Health Services, Tobacco Control Section. (1998).A model for change: The California experience in tobacco control. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.dhs.ca.gov/tobacco/documents/modelforchange.pdf
7.
California Department of Health Services, Tobacco Control Section. (2001).Eliminating smoking in bars, taverns and gaming clubs: The California Smoke-Free Workplace Act. Retrieved on January 20, 2004, from http://www.dhs.ca.gov/tobacco/documents/smokefreeworkplacecasestudy.pdf
8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001). State-specific prevalence of current cigarette smoking among adults, and policies and attitudes about secondhand smoke—United States, 2000.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,50(49), 1101-1106.
9.
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001).Surveillance and evaluation data resources for comprehensive tobacco control programs. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/surveillance_manual/contents.html
10.
Field Research Corporation. (1998).Smoking Policy and Smoke-Free Bar Survey Instrument, 1998. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.dhs.ca.gov/tobacco/documents/LPEdhsspsfbs98.pdf
11.
Fisher, L. (2000). Smoke-free public areas: A breath of fresh air. Cancer Causes and Control,11, 773-775.
12.
Florida Department of Health. (2001).Results from the Florida Department of Health 2001 Employee Tobacco Survey: Needs assessment and agreement with workplace policies on smoking. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.doh.state.fl.us/family/tobacco/survey/results.pdf
13.
Florida Department of Health, The Florida Leadership Council for Tobacco Control. (2000).Tobacco prevention and control: Florida's comprehensive plan, 2000-2005. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.doh.state.fl.us/family/tobacco/SDP.html
14.
Hodson, J. (2003, September, 24). Smoking ban debates begin in Dayton.Dayton Daily News. Retrieved July 8, 2004, from http://www.smokefreeohio.org/Dayton/media.htm
15.
Massachusetts Department of Public Health. (2000).Independent evaluation of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program: Sixth annual report: January 1994-June 1999. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.state.ma.us/dph/mtcp/evaluat.htm
16.
Mathsoft Engineering & Education, Inc. (2003).Study works online. Understanding polls. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.studyworksonline.com
17.
National Cancer Institute. (2003).The Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS). Retrieved June 28, 2004, from http://riskfactor.cancer.gov/studies/tus-cps/
18.
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004).Taking action against secondhand smoke. Retrieved June 28, 2004, from http://www.ccdc.gov/tobacco/ETS_Toolkit
19.
New York City Coalition for a Smoke-Free City. (2003, April 6).Poll results on Clean Indoor Air [Press release]. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.nycsmokefree.org/docs/NY-ersOverwhelmingsupportCIA.doc
20.
Navrot, M. (1999, September 29). Poll shows support for smoking ban.Albuquerque Journal. Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://www.abqjournal.com
21.
Niles, R. (2004).Statistics every writer should know. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.robertniles.com/stats/
22.
Shopland, D. R., Gerlach, K. K., Burns, D. M., Hartman, A. M., Gibson, J. T. (2001). State-specific trends in smoke-free workplace policy coverage: The current population survey tobacco use supplement, 1993 to 1999.Journal of Occupational Environmental Medicine,43, 680-686.
23.
SPSS, Inc. (1999).Base 10.0 User's Guide. Chicago: Author.
24.
University of California. (1999).California Tobacco Survey: Adult Attitudes and Practices Instrument, 1996. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.dhs.ca.gov/tobacco/documents/LPEctsadu96.pdf
