Why Be Smoke-Free? A Qualitative Study of Smoke-Free Restaurant Owner and Manager Opinions

Abstract

This qualitative study captured the opinions of the owners and managers of smoke-free restaurants. The purpose of this study, initiated by local citizens who were members of a group called Healthy Alamance, was to identify the motivations and experiences of restaurant owners and managers who had committed to smoke-free indoor environments. Telephone interviews were attempted with all 80 owners/managers of smoke-free restaurants in Alamance County, North Carolina, and 87.5% of these restaurant owners/managers completed the interview. The investigators isolated economic factors, customer demands and considerations, and environmental issues as the three principal categories describing smoke-free restaurant owners’ and managers’ motivations for becoming smoke free. The results from this study can be used to assist communities working toward the development of a smoke-free restaurant campaign.

Keywords

tobacco control programs environmental tobacco smoke smoke-free restaurants why be smoke-free?

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alamar, B.C. , & Glantz, S.A. ( 2004). Smoke-free ordinances increase restaurant profit and value. Contemporary Economic Policy, 22(4), 520-525.

American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation. ( 2006). States and municipalities with 100% smokefree laws in workplaces, restaurants, or bars. Retrieved November 15, 2006 , from http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/100ordlist.pdf

California Environmental Protection Agency & Air Resources Board. (2005). Appendix III: Proposed identification of environmental tobacco smoke as a toxic air contaminant . . . as approved by the scientific review panel on June 24, 2005. Sacramento, CA: Author.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 2000). Strategies for reducing exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, increasing tobacco-use cessation, and reducing initiation in communities and health-care systems: A report on recommendations of the task force on community preventive services. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 49, 1-11.

ETS policy manual: An A to Z toolbox for community change. (n.d.). Retrieved September 14, 2006, from http://fammed.unc.edu/enter/toolbox.htm

Glantz, S.A. ( 1999). Smoke-free restaurant ordinances do not affect restaurant business. Period. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 5, vi-ix.

Glantz, S.A. , & Smith, L.R. ( 1994). The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants on restaurant sales. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 1081-1085.

Glantz, S.A. , & Smith, L.R. ( 1997). The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants and bars on revenues: A follow-up. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1687-1693.

Goldstein, A.O. , & Sobel, R.A. ( 1998). Environmental tobacco smoke regulations have not hurt restaurant sales in North Carolina. North Carolina Medical Journal, 59, 284-287.

10.

Koop, C.E. ( 1986). The health consequences of involuntary smoking: A report of the surgeon general, 1986. Rockville, MD : U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

11.

Miles, M.B. , & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.

12.

North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. (2003). North Carolina agriculture overview: Field crops. Retrieved June 26, 2006, from http://www.agr.state.nc.us/stats/general/crop_fld.htm

13.

North Carolina Prevention Partners. (2006). Hospital with 100% tobacco-free campus-wide policies. Retrieved December 2006 from http://www.ncpreventionpartners.org/content/documents/1hospitallist.pdf

14.

Tax Policy Center. (2006). Tax facts: Cigarette rates 2001-2006. Retrieved December 15, 2006 , from http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/TaxFacts/TFDB/TFTemplate.cfm?Docid=433

15.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2006). The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.