The Effectiveness of an Interactive Small Group Diabetes Intervention in Improving Knowledge,Feeling of Control,and Behavior

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a small group intervention in improving knowledge, feeling of control, and behaviors related to self-management of diabetes. The intervention includes educational content on diabetes self-management as well as discussion of attitudes, feelings, and motivations about living with diabetes. The authors randomized volunteers into an intervention group that participated in the small-group learning activity and a control group that received a diabetes self-care book. A survey was conducted by telephone before and after each intervention and the difference in change over time between the groups was assessed for each outcome. Compared to the control group, participants in the small-group activity reported significant changes on all three outcomes adjusting for demographic differences between the groups. Because facilitating the learning session does not require clinically trained personnel, this type of intervention could broaden the resources available to people with diabetes.

Keywords

diabetes education diabetes intervention diabetes self-management behavior change

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Diabetes Association. (ADA) . (2001). American Diabetes Association: Clinical practice recommendations 2001. Diabetes Care, 24(s1), s1-s134.

American Diabetes Association. (ADA) . (2003a). Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2002. Diabetes Care, 26(3), 917-932.

American Diabetes Association. (ADA) . (2003b). Implications of the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care, 26(Suppl. 1), S25-S27.

Anderson, R. M. , Funnell, M. M. , Butler, P. M. , Arnold, M. S. , Fitzgerald, J. T. , & Feste, C. C. (1995). Patient empowerment: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 18(7), 943-949.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychology Review, 84, 191-215.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Baranowski, T. , Perry, C. L. , & Parcel, G. S. (1997). How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact: Social cognitive theory. In K. Glanz , F. M. Lewis , & B. K. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory research and practice (pp. 153-178). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Brown, S. (1990). Studies of educational interventions and outcomes in diabetic adults: A meta-analysis revisited. Patient Education Counsel, 16(3), 189-215.

Day, J. L. (2000). Diabetic patient education: Determinants of success. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 16(Suppl. 1), S70-S74.

10.

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group . (1993). DCCT: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 977-986.

11.

Elasy, T. A. , Ellis, S. E. , Brown, A. , & Pichert, J. W. (2001). A taxonomy for diabetes educational interventions. Patient Education and Counseling, 43(2), 121-127.

12.

Glasgow, R. E. , & Anderson, R. M. (1999). In diabetes care, moving from compliance to adherence is not enough: Something entirely different is needed. Diabetes Care, 22(12), 2090-2092.

13.

Glasgow, R. E. , & Osteen, V. L. (1992). Evaluating diabetes education: Are we measuring the most important outcomes? Diabetes Care, 15(10), 1423-1432.

14.

Greene, D. S. , Beaudin, B. P. , & Bryan, J. M. (1991). Addressing attitudes during diabetes education: Suggestions from adult education. Diabetes Educator, 17(6), 470-473.

15.

Hoke, M. M. , Byrd, T. L. , Kelly, M. P. , Brandon, J. E. , & Lang, P. (2002). The clinic HELP initiative: Promoting health education in primary care clinics. Health Promotion Practice, 3(4), 477-484.

16.

Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center . (1998). Diabetes care profile. Retrieved from http://www.med.umich.edu/mdrtc/survey/index.html%23dcp

17.

Mokdad, A.H. , Ford, E.S. , Bowman, B.A. , Dietz, W.H. , Vinicor, F. , Bales, V. S. , et al. (2003). Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(1), 76-79.

18.

Moore, K. , & Mengel, M. (2002). Expanding the team: The use of volunteers in a diabetes education program. Diabetes Educator, 28(4), 554-558, 560, 562.

19.

Norris, S. L. , Engelgau, M. M. , & Narayan, K. M. (2001). Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care, 24(3), 561-587.

20.

Rickheim, P. L. , Weaver, T. W. , Flader, J. L. , & Kendall, D. M. (2002). Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education: A randomized study. Diabetes Care, 25(2), 269-274.

21.

Rust, K. (1985). Variance estimation for complex estimators in sample surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 4(1), 381-397.

22.

Von Korff, M. , Moore, J. E. , Lorig, K. , Cherkin, D. C. , Saunders, K. , Gonzalez, V. M. , et al. (1998). A randomized trial of a lay person-led self-management group intervention for back pain patients in primary care. Spine, 23(23), 2608-2615.

23.

Wagner, E. H. , Sandhu, N. , Newton, K. M. , McCulloch, D. K. , Ramsey, S. D. , & Grothaus, L. C. (2001). Effect of improved glycemic control on health care costs and utilization. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(2), 182-189.

24.

Whittemore, R. (2000). Strategies to facilitate lifestyle change associated with diabetes mellitus. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 32(3), 225-232.