The importance of regular physical activity is well documented, yet according to epidemiological surveillance data, physical inactivity among all age groups persists. Past attempts to promote physical activity focused on individual-level changes; current approaches focus on environmental changes that will provide opportunities for whole communities to be active. The current ecological focus has led to an increase in funding and research regarding environmental supports of physical activity. As this is a new area of research, much work needs to be done to improve the ability to assess environmental features that support physical activity. This article describes a partnership between researchers and community members to develop and test an objective tool to measure sidewalk maintenance. Community members used data collected with the tool to increase awareness about sidewalk maintenance issues among local policy makers. Collaboration between researchers and community partners was critical for the success of this study.
Brownson, R. C., Baker, E. A., Housemann, R. A., Brennan, L. K., & Bacak, S. J. (2001). Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 91(12), 1995-2003.
2.
Center for Health Improvement. (2003). Health policy coach. Available at http://healthpolicycoach.org/doc.asp?id=23
3.
City of Sumter. (2003). The history of Sumter South Carolina. Available at www.sumter-sc.com/historysum.htm
4.
Fetterman, D. M. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: An introduction to theory and practice. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 3-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Florida Department of Transportation Safety Office. (1998). Walkable communities: Twelve steps for an effective program. Available at www.dot.state.fl.us/safety/ped_bike/brochures/ped_bike_brochures_walking.htm
6.
Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2002). The relative influence of individual, social, and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 1793-1812.
7.
Green, L. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (1991). Health promotion planning: An educational and ecological approach (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
8.
Greenwald, M., & Boarnet, M. (2002). The built environment as a determinant of walking behavior: Analyzing non-work pedestrian travel in Portland, Oregon. Transportation Research Record, 1780, 33-42.
9.
Handy, S., Boarnet, M., Ewing, R., & Killingsworth, R. (2002). How the built environment affects PA: Views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2S), 64-73.
10.
Handy, S., Clifton, K., & Fisher, J. (1998). The effectiveness of land use policies as a strategy for reducing automobile dependence: A study of Austin neighborhoods (SWUTC/98/465650-1). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
11.
Hovell, M. F., Hofstetter, C. R., Sallis, J. F., Rauh, M. J. D., & Barrington, E. (1992). Correlates of change in walking for exercise: An exploratory analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63(4), 425-434.
12.
Landis, J., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
13.
McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), 351-377.
14.
Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (1998). Improving health through community organization and community building: A health education perspective. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (pp. 30-67). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
15.
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits. (2003). Helpful handouts. Available at www.mncn.org/handouts.htm
16.
Moudon, A. V., & Lee, C. (2003). Walking and biking: An evaluation of environmental audit instruments. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), 21-37.
17.
National Center for Bicycling and Walking. (1999). Pedestrian guide. Available at www.bikewalk.org/pedestrian_guide.htm
18.
National Safety Council and the Partnership for a Walkable America. (2001). Walkable America checklist. Available at http://nsc.org/walk/wkcheck.htm
19.
New Jersey Department of Transportation. (1999). Pedestrian compatible planning and design guidelines. Available at www.state.nj.us/transportation/publicat/pedest_guide.htm
20.
Office of Transportation Engineering and Development. (1998). Pedestrian design guide. City of Portland Oregon pedestrian transportation program. Available at www.trans.ci.portland.or.us/DesignReferences/Pedestrian/DesignGuide.pdf
21.
Otak Inc. (1997). Pedestrian facilities guidebook: Incorporating pedestrians into Washington’s transportation system. Available at www.wsdot.wa.gov/TA/PAandI/Bike-Ped/Guide_Reg.htm
22.
Pollack, P. B. (1999). The community survey. Liveable communities: An evaluation guide. Available at http://research.aarp.org/consume/d16905_communities.pdf
23.
Powell, K. E., Greaney, M. L., Huang, Y., & Whitt, M. (1999). Good health, it’s your move: Physical activity in South Carolina (Technical report prepared for the Department of Health and Environmental Control). Columbia: University of South Carolina, Prevention Research Center.
24.
Sharpe, P. A., Granner, M. L., Hutto, B., & Ainsworth, B. E. (2004). Association of environmental factors to meeting physical activity recommendations in two South Carolina counties. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(3), 251-257.
25.
Stokols, D. (1992). Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: Toward a social ecology of health promotion. American Psychologist, 47(1), 6-22.
26.
Sumter South Carolina Chamber of Commerce. (2003). Community profile. Available at www.sumterchamber.com
27.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). State and county quickfacts. Sumter County, South Carolina. Available at http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/45/45085.html
28.
U.S. Department of Transportation, and Federal Highway Administration. (2002). Pedestrian facilities users guide—Providing safety and mobility. Available at www.wa.kinginfo.lorg/pdf/peduserguide/peduserguide.pdf
