Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2025
Women’s Perceptions of Maternity Care Responses to Domestic and Family Violence and Abuse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies
Domestic and family violence (DFV) disproportionately affects women in the perinatal period. Routine DFV screening is known to improve DFV identification, however, it is crucial to understand women’s views of routine DFV inquiry and their post-disclosure needs specific to the maternity care setting. The aim of this qualitative meta-synthesis was to explore perinatal women’s perceptions and experiences of routine DFV screening and post-disclosure practices in antenatal care. Comprehensive searches of seven relevant databases and subsequent hand searches were conducted in September 2023 and April 2025 for primary qualitative peer-reviewed journal articles published in English from 2013 onward. Fourteen articles were included in this review. Data derived from semi-structured interviews within included articles were thematically analyzed and synthesized by two independent reviewers. Review findings evidence that women were generally in favor of routine antenatal DFV screening, preferably within a midwifery continuity of care model. Women emphasized the need for a trusting relationship with their screening professional and impressed the need for supportive post-disclosure services. Further research examining the distinct perspectives and needs of refugee and minority groups on the topic, as well as the longer-term outcomes of routine DFV screening and post-disclosure interventions, is required. Findings of this review may guide future funding and policy decisions around routine screening in maternity services to improve disclosure and outcomes for women experiencing DFV.
AndreasenK.RaschV.DokkedahlS.ScheiB.LindeD. S. (2024). Facilitators and barriers for digital screening and a supportive intervention within antenatal care among Danish pregnant women facing intimate partner violence: A qualitative study nested in the STOP study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 42, a101046, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101046
BacchusL.MezeyG.BewleyS. (2002). Women’s perceptions and experiences of routine enquiry for domestic violence in a maternity service. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.00514.x
4.
BacchusL. J.BullockL.SharpsP.BurnettC.SchminkeyD.BullerA. M.CampbellJ. (2016). ‘Opening the door’: A qualitative interpretive study of women’s experiences of being asked about intimate partner violence and receiving an intervention during perinatal home visits in rural and urban settings in the USA. Journal of Research in Nursing, 21(5–6), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987116649634
5.
BranjerdpornG.ClonanT.BoddyJ.GillespieK.O’MalleyR.BairdK. (2023). Australian women’s perspectives of routine enquiry into domestic violence before and after birth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23(1), 44–44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05345-7
CampoM. (2015). Domestic and family violence in pregnancy and early parenthood: Overview and emerging interventions. Australian Government: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
8.
ChangJ. C.DadoD.SchusslerS.HawkerL.HollandC. L.BurkeJ. G.ClussP. A. (2012). In person versus computer screening for intimate partner violence among pregnant patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 88(3), 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.021
9.
CreedyD. K.BairdK.GillespieK. (2020). A cross-sectional survey of pregnant women’s perceptions of routine domestic and family violence screening and responses by midwives: Testing of three new tools. Women and Birth, 33(4), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2019.06.018
EvansM. A.FederG. S. (2016). Help-seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: A qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 19(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12330
12.
FederG. S.HutsonM.RamsayJ.TaketA. R. (2006). Women exposed to intimate partner violence: Expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: A meta-analysis of qualitative studies. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.1.22
13.
Garnweidner-HolmeL. M.LukasseM.SolheimM.HenriksenL. (2017). Talking about intimate partner violence in multi-cultural antenatal care: A qualitative study of pregnant women’s advice for better communication in South-East Norway. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), 123–123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1308-6
14.
GreenhalghT. M.BidewellJ.CrispE.LambrosA.WarlandJ. (2020). Understanding research methods for evidence-based practice in health (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
15.
HillA.PallittoC.McCleary-SillsJ.Garcia-MorenoC. (2016). A systematic review and meta-analysis of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and selected birth outcomes. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 133(3), 269–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.023
16.
HussainN.SpragueS.MaddenK.HussainF. N.PindiproluB.BhandariM. (2013). A comparison of the types of screening tool administration methods used for the detection of intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838013515759
17.
IsobelS. (2023). Trauma and the perinatal period: A review of the theory and practice of trauma-sensitive interactions for nurses and midwives. Nursing Open, 10(12), 7585–7595. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2017
18.
JackS. M.Ford-GilboeM.DavidovD.MacMillanH. L. & NFP IV Research Team (2017). Identification and assessment of intimate partner violence in nurse home visitation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(15–16), 2215–2228. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13392
19.
JohnsonM. P. (2011). Gender and types of intimate partner violence: A response to an anti-feminist literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 289–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.006
20.
KataokaY.ImazekiM. (2018). Experiences of being screened for intimate partner violence during pregnancy: A qualitative study of women in Japan. BMC Women’s Health, 18(1), 75–75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0566-4
21.
KirwanC.MeskellP.BiestyL.DowlingM.KirwanA. (2024). IPV routine enquiry in antenatal care: Perspectives of women and healthcare professionals—A qualitative study. Violence Against Women, 10778012241231784. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241231784
22.
McTavishJ. R.MacGregorJ. C. D.WathenC. N.MacMillanH. L. (2016). Children’s exposure to intimate partner violence: An overview. International Review of Psychiatry, 28(5), 504–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2016.1205001
23.
MuellerI.TronickE. (2019). Early life exposure to violence: Developmental consequences on brain and behavior. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, Article 156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00156
O’DohertyL. J.TaftA.HegartyK.RamsayJ.DavidsonL. L.FederG. (2014). Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: Abridged Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Medical Journal, 348(7958), g2913–g2913. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2913
26.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.. . . MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The British Medical Journal, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
27.
Pastor-MorenoG.Ruiz-PérezI.Henares-MontielJ.PetrovaD. (2020). Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and risk of fetal and neonatal death: A meta-analysis with socioeconomic context indicators. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 222(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.045
28.
PedersonA.MirlashariJ.LyonsJ.BrottoL. A. (2023). How to facilitate disclosure of violence while delivering perinatal care: The experience of survivors and healthcare providers. Journal of Family Violence, 38, 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00371-z
29.
ProsmanG. J.LoFoWongS. H.Van Der WoudenJ. C.Lagro-JanssenA. L. M. (2015). Effectiveness of home visiting in reducing partner violence for families experiencing abuse: A systematic review. Family Practice, 32(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmu091
30.
SalmonD.BairdK. M.WhiteP. (2015). Women’s views and experiences of antenatal enquiry for domestic abuse during pregnancy. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 18(5), 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12060
31.
ScottS. E.JenkinsG.KickieviczE.SaladinoJ.RickA.LevensonR.ChangJ. C.RandellK. A.DuplessisV.MillerE.RagavanM. (2024). Creating healing-centered spaces for intimate partner violence survivors in the postpartum unit: Examining current practices and desired resources among health care providers and postpartum people. Journal of Women’s Health, 33(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.0347
32.
ShamseerL.MoherD.ClarkeM.GhersiD.LiberatiA.PetticrewM.ShekelleP.StewartL. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 349, g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
33.
SpangaroJ.HerringS.Koziol-MclainJ.RutherfordA.FrailM.-A.ZwiA. B. (2016). “They aren’t really black fellas but they are easy to talk to”: Factors which influence Australian Aboriginal women’s decision to disclose intimate partner violence during pregnancy. Midwifery, 41(Oct 2016), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.004
34.
SpangaroJ.HerringS.Koziol-McLainJ.RutherfordA.ZwiA. B. (2019). “Yarn about it”: Aboriginal Australian women’s perceptions of the impact of routine enquiry for intimate partner violence. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 21(7), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2018.1519117
35.
SpangaroJ.Koziol-McLainJ.ZwiA.RutherfordA.FrailM.-A.RuaneJ. (2016). Deciding to tell: Qualitative configurational analysis of decisions to disclose experience of intimate partner violence in antenatal care. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 154(Apr 2016), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.032
36.
SpangaroJ. M. J. R. (2014). Health interventions for family and domestic violence: A literature review. University of New South Wales.
37.
StöcklH.HertleinL.HimslI.DitschN.BlumeC.HasbargenU.FrieseK.StöcklD. (2013). Acceptance of routine or case-based inquiry for intimate partner violence: A mixed method study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13(1), 77–77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-77
38.
TaftA. J.HookerL.HumphreysC.HegartyK.WalterR.AdamsC.AgiusP.SmallR. (2015). Maternal and child health nurse screening and care for mothers experiencing domestic violence (MOVE): A cluster randomised trial. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 150–150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0375-7
39.
TarziaL.BohrenM. A.CameronJ.Garcia-MorenoC.O’DohertyL.FioletR.HookerL.WellingtonM.ParkerR.Koziol-MclainJ.FederG.HegartyK. (2020). Women’s experiences and expectations after disclosure of intimate partner abuse to a healthcare provider: A qualitative meta-synthesis. BMJ Open, 10(11), e041339-e041339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041339
40.
ThomasJ.HardenA. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45–45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
41.
WadsworthP.DegesieK.KothariC.MoeA. (2018). Intimate partner violence during the perinatal period. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 14(10), 753–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2018.08.009
42.
WalterB.IndreboeH.LukasseM.HenriksenL.Garnweidner-HolmeL. (2021). Pregnant women’s attitudes toward and experiences with a tablet intervention to promote safety behaviors in a randomized controlled trial: Qualitative study. JMIR Formative Research, 5(7), e28680–e28680. https://doi.org/10.2196/28680
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
