This study analyzes variables related to the context and consequences of women's use of violence as well as a wide range of violent behaviors used and experienced by court-ordered English- and Spanish-speaking women. Data were derived from intake assessments of 125 court-ordered women over 24 months. Almost all of the women reported a history of abuse perpetrated by their partners. Women committed significantly fewer violent acts against their partners than their partners committed against them. Differences between English- and Spanish-speaking women's victimization, use of violence, and help seeking were largely similar, however, important differences emerged.
Archer, J. (2002). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin,126, 651-680.
2.
Barnett, O.W., Lee, C.Y., & Thelen, R.E. (1997). Gender differences in attributions of self-defense and control in interpartner aggression. Violence Against Women , 3, 462-481.
3.
Berns, N. (2001). Degendering the problem and gendering the blame. Political discourse on women and violence. Gender & Society , 15, 262-281.
4.
Bonilla-Santiago, G. (1996). Latina battered women: Barriers to service delivery and cultural considerations. In A. R. Roberts (Ed.), Helping battered women. New perspectives and remedies (pp. 229-234). New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Bonilla-Santiago, G. (2002). Latina battered women: Barriers to service delivery and cultural considerations. In A. R. Roberts (Ed.), Handbook of domestic violence interventions (pp. 464-471). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Caetano, R., Nelson, S., & Cunradi, C. (2001). Intimate partner violence, dependence symptoms and social consequences from drinking among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. American Journal ofAddiction, 10, 60-69.
7.
Caetano, R., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & McGrath, C. (2004). Acculturation, drinking, and intimate partner violence among Hispanic couples in the United States: A longitudinal study . Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26(1), 60-78.
8.
Caetano, R., Schafer, J., & Cunradi, C.B. (2001). Alcohol-related intimate partner violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(1), 58-65.
9.
Cunradi, C.B., Caetano, R., & Schafer, J. (2002). Socioeconomic predictors of intimate partner violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Family Violence, 17(4), 377-389.
10.
Currie, D.H. (1998). Violent men or violent women? Whose definition counts? In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 97-111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Dasgupta, S.D. (1999). Just like men? A critical view of violence by women. In M. F. Shepard & E. L. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence. Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 195-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Dasgupta, S.D. (2002). A framework for understanding women's use of violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women , 8, 1364-1389.
13.
Dobash, R.P., Dobash, R.E., Cavanagh, K., & Lewis, R. (1998). Separate and intersecting realities: A comparison of men's and women's accounts of violence against women. Violence Against Women, 4, 382-414.
14.
Dobash, R.P., Dobash, R.E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence . Social Problems, 39, 71-91.
15.
Fiebert, M.S. (1997). References examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners: An annotated bibliography. Sexuality &Culture, 8, 140-177.
16.
Field, C.A., & Caetano, R. (2005). Longitudinal model predicting mutual partner violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States general population . Violence & Victims, 20(5), 499-511.
17.
Field, C.A., Caetano, R., & Nelson, S. (2004). Alcohol and violence related cognitive risk factors associated with perpetration of intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 19(4), 249-253.
18.
Hamberger, L.K. (1997). Female offenders in domestic violence: A look at actions in their context. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, &Trauma, 1, 117-129.
19.
Hamberger, L.K. (2005). Men's and women's use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples: Toward a gender-sensitive analysis. Violence & Victims, 20(2), 131-151.
20.
Hamberger, L.K., & Guse, C.E. (2002). Men's and women's use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples. Violence Against Women, 8, 1301-1331.
21.
Hamberger, L.K., & Potente, T. (1994). Counseling heterosexual women arrested for domestic violence: Implications for theory and practice. Violence and Victims, 9, 125-137.
22.
Jacobson, N.S., Gottman, J.M., Waltz, J., Rushe, R., Babcock, J., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1994). Affect, verbal content and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 982-988.
23.
Kantor, G.K., Jasinski, J.L., & Aldarondo, E. (1994). Sociocultural status and incidence of marital violence in Hispanic families. Violence & Victims, 9, 207-222.
24.
Kernsmith, P. (2005). Exerting power or striking back: A gendered comparison of motivations for domestic violence perpetration. Violence & Victims, 20(2), 173-185.
25.
Kimmel, M.S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332-1363.
26.
Kurtz, D. (1993). Physical assaults by husbands: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles, & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 88-103). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Neidig, P., & Thorn, G. (1995). Violent marriages: Gender differences in levels of current violence and past abuse. Journal of Family Violence , 10, 159-176.
28.
Malloy, K.A., McClosky, K.A., Grigsby, N., & Gardner, D. (2003). Women's use of violence within intimate relationships. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, &Trauma, 6(2), 37-59.
29.
Miller, S.L. (1989). Unintended side effects of pro-arrest policies and their race and class implications for battered women: A cautionary note . Criminal Justice Policy Review, 3(3), 299-317.
30.
Miller, S.L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence . Violence Against Women, 7, 1339-1376.
31.
Miller, S.L., Gregory, C., & Iovanni, L. (2005). One size fits all? A gender-neutral approach to a gender-specific problem: Contrasting batterer treatment programs for male and female offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 336-359.
32.
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth Model. New York: Springer.
33.
Santiago, A.M., & Morash, M. (1995). Strategies for serving Latina battered women. In J. A. Garber & R. S. Turner (Ed.), Gender in urban research (pp. 219-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Saunders, D.G. (1995). The tendency to arrest victims of domestic violence. A preliminary analysis of officer characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10(2), 147-158.
35.
Saunders, D.G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? A review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8, 1424-1448.
36.
Sorenson, S.B., & Telles, C.A. (1991). Self-reports of spousal violence in a Mexican-American and Non-Hispanic white population. Violence & Victims , 6(1), 3-15.
37.
Steinmetz, S.K. (1978). The battered husband syndrome. Victimology: An International Journal, 2, 499-509.
38.
Stets, J.E., & Straus, M.A. (1992). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. A.Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8145 families (pp. 151-166). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
39.
Straus, M.A., Gelles, R.J., & Steinmetz, S.K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
40.
Swan, S.C., Gambone, L.J., Fields, A.M., Sullivan, T.P., & Snow, D.L. (2005). Women who use violence in intimate relationships: The role of anger, victimization, and symptoms of posttaumatic stress and depression. Violence & Victims, 20(3), 267-285.
41.
Swan, S.C., & Snow, D.L. (2002). A typology of women's use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 286-319.
42.
Swan, S.C., & Snow, D.L. (2003). Behavioral and psychological differences among abused women who use violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 9, 75-109.
43.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6(2), 142-161.
44.
Torres, S. (1987). Hispanic-American battered women. Why consider cultural differences?Response, 10(3), 20-21.
45.
Torres, S. (1991). A comparison of wife abuse between two cultures: Perceptions, attitudes, nature, and extent. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 12, 113-131.
46.
West, C.M., Kantor, G.K., & Jasinski, J.L. (1998). Sociodemographic predictors and cultural barriers to help-seeking behavior by Latina and Anglo American battered women. Violence & Victims, 13, 361-375.
47.
Worcester, N. (2002). Women's use of force. Complexities and challenges of taking the issue seriously. Violence Against Women, 8, 1390-1415.
48.
Yllo, K.A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence . In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 47-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
