The aim of the present review was to systematically identify and examine current knowledge regarding the frequency of any form of technology-facilitated sexual violence (TFSV) perpetrated against women aged 16 years and older. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was applied when performing the present review. Observational studies reporting prevalence data for any form of TFSV against women aged 16 years and above were considered for inclusion. Four meta-analyses were conducted. One examined data pertaining to overall TFSV, while the other three each addressed a key dimension based on the type of victimization under study. Random-effects models were used to compute pooled estimate prevalences (95% CI). Included studies reported prevalence in 32 different countries at different time points, with 28,220 women being interviewed (16–97 years). A total of 1,437 potential articles were gathered from 8 databases and 17 studies were selected for analysis. Included studies exhibited a low risk of bias (12 strong methodological quality—5 medium). Rates of TFSV ranged from 2.2% to 84%. Global estimated prevalence was 30.60% (95% CI [24.08, 37.12]). The most frequently reported behaviors pertained to “digital sexual harassment” (28.54%) followed by “technology-facilitated aggression and coercion” (16.93%) and “image-based sexual abuse” (6.48%). Present findings shed light on a significant gap in understanding the experiences of adult women. The wide range of reported frequencies underscores the importance of unifying terms and standardizing measurement instruments, emphasizing the need for a cohesive approach to better comprehend and address the multifaceted nature of TFSV.
ArafaA.EshakE. S.Abu SalemE.MohamedA.MahmoudO. (2021). Psychological correlates with violence against women victimization in Egypt. International Journal of Mental Health, 50(1), 78–90.
2.
De AraújoA. V. M.BonfimC. V. doBushatskyM.FurtadoB. M. A. (2022). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A review of virtual violence against women. Research, Society and Development, 11(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25757
3.
BaileyJ.HenryN.FlynnA. (2021). Technology-facilitated violence and abuse: International perspectives and experiences. In BaileyJ.FlynnA.HenryN. (Eds.), The Emerald International Handbook of Technology-Facilitated Violence and Abuse (pp. 1–17). Emerald Publishing Limited.
4.
BarakA. (2005). Sexual harassment on the internet. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 77–92.
5.
BatesS. (2017). Revenge porn and mental health: A qualitative analysis of the mental health effects of revenge porn on female survivors. Feminist Criminology, 12(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116654565
6.
Benítez-HidalgoV.Henares-MontielJ.Ruiz-PérezI.Pastor-MorenoG. (2023). Cyber sexual harassment against women and impact on health. A cross-sectional study in a representative population sample. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), 46(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad182
7.
BrighiA.AmadoriA.SummererK.MeninD. (2023). Prevalence and risk factors for nonconsensual distribution of intimate images among Italian young adults: Implications for prevention and intervention. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 23(4), 100414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100414
8.
BrownC.SanciL.HegartyK. (2021). Technology-facilitated abuse in relationships: Victimisation patterns and impact in young people. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106897.
9.
CasanovasL. V.-L.SerraL.CanalsC. S.Sanz-BarberoB.Vives-CasesC.LópezM. J.Otero-GarcíaL.PérezG.Renart-VicensG. (2022). Prevalence of sexual harassment among young Spaniards before, during, and after the COVID-19 lockdown period in Spain. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1888. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14264-9
10.
ChampionA.OswaldF.PedersenC. L. (2021). Technology-facilitated sexual violence and suicide risk: A serial mediation model investigating bullying, depression, perceived burdensomeness, and thwarted belongingness. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 30(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2020-0044
11.
ClariM.ContiA.ScacchiA.ScattagliaM.DimonteV.GianinoM. M. (2020). Prevalence of workplace sexual violence against healthcare workers providing home care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 23.
Cuenca-PiquerasC.Fernández-PradosJ. S.González-MorenoM. J. (2020). Face-to-face versus online harassment of European women: Importance of date and place of birth. Sexuality and Culture, 24(1), 157–173.
DuránM.Rodríguez-DomínguezC. (2023). Sending of unwanted dick pics as a modality of sexual cyber-violence: An exploratory study of its emotional impact and reactions in women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(5), 5236–5261. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221120906
Gámez-GuadixM.Martínez-BacaicoaJ. (2023). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: Typologies, prevalence, and associated variables. In MartinC. R.PreedyV. R.PatelV. B. (Eds.), Handbook of anger, aggression, and violence (pp. 375–389). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31547-3_20
18.
GassóA. M.Mueller-JohnsonK.AgustinaJ. R.Gomez-DuranE. L.GassóA. M.Mueller-JohnsonK.AgustinaJ. R.Gómez-DuránE. L. (2021). Exploring sexting and online sexual victimization during the covid-19 pandemic lockdown. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6662.
19.
GassóA. M.Mueller-JohnsonK.MontielI. (2020). Sexting, online sexual victimization, and psychopathology correlates by sex: Depression, anxiety, and global psychopathology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 1018.
20.
GeorgeB. J.AbanI. B. (2016). An application of meta-analysis based on DerSimonian and Laird method. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 23(4), 690–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0249-6
21.
GoodsonP.McCormickD.EvansA. (2001). Searching for sexually explicit materials on the Internet: An exploratory study of college students’ behavior and attitudes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30(2), 101–118.
22.
GottfriedE. D.ShierE. K.MulayA. L. (2020). Child pornography and online sexual solicitation. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(3), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-1132-y
23.
HenryN.FlynnA.PowellA. (2019). Image-based sexual abuse: Victims and perpetrators. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice [Electronic Resource], 572, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.336740761394777
24.
HenryN.FlynnA.PowellA. (2020). Technology-facilitated domestic and sexual violence: A review. Violence Against Women, 26(15–16), 1828–1854.
25.
HenryN.PowellA. (2016). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 19(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016650189
26.
HenryN.PowellA. (2018). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 19(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016650189
27.
MadiganS.VillaniV.AzzopardiC.LautD.SmithT.TempleJ. R.BrowneD.DimitropoulosG. (2018). The prevalence of unwanted online sexual exposure and solicitation among youth: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 63(2), 133–141.
28.
Martínez-BacaicoaJ.SorrelM. A.Gámez-GuadixM. (2024). Development and validation of technology-facilitated sexual violence perpetration and victimization scales among adults. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241229575
Munro-KramerM. L.SkidmoreL. M.CannonL. M.HuhmanA. K.CarterS. N.WilliamsenK. M.NgoQ. M. (2021). The dynamics of interpersonal relationships: Understanding power and control tactics among college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21–22), NP19522–NP19548.
OuzzaniM.HammadyH.FedorowiczZ.ElmagarmidA. (2016). Rayyan: A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210.
33.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.. . . MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
34.
PatelU.RoeschR. (2022). The prevalence of technology-facilitated sexual violence: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(2), 428–443.
35.
PowellA.FlynnA. (2023). Technology-facilitated abuse victimization: A gendered analysis in a representative survey of adults. Feminist Criminology, 18(5), 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851231196548
36.
PowellA.HenryN. (2019). Technology-facilitated sexual violence victimization: Results from an online survey of Australian adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(17), 3637–3665.
37.
ReedE.WongA.RajA. (2020). Cyber sexual harassment: A summary of current measures and implications for future research. Violence Against Women, 26(12–13), 1727–1740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219880959
38.
RossJ. M.DrouinM.CoupeA. (2019). Sexting coercion as a component of intimate partner polyvictimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(11), 2269–2291.
39.
RuvalcabaY.EatonA. A. (2020). Nonconsensual pornography among US adults: A sexual scripts framework on victimization, perpetration, and health correlates for women and men. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 68–78.
40.
Salerno-FerraroA. C.ErentzenC.SchullerR. A. (2021). Young women’s experiences with technology-facilitated sexual violence from male strangers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19–20), NP17860–NP17885.
41.
SheikhM. M. R.RogersM. M. (2024). Technology-facilitated sexual violence and abuse in low and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 25(2), 1614–1629. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231191189
42.
SimonovicD., & UN. Human Rights Council. (2018). Report of the special rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences on online violence against women and girls from a human rights perspective. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1641160
43.
SnaychukL. A.O’NeillM. L. (2020). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: Prevalence, risk, and resiliency in undergraduate students. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 29(8), 984–999.
44.
StroupD. F.BerlinJ. A.MortonS. C.OlkinI.WilliamsonG. D.RennieD.MoherD.BeckerB. J.SipeT. A.ThackerS. B. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) Group. JAMA, 283(15), 2008–2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
45.
TurnerH. A.FinkelhorD.ColburnD. (2023). Predictors of online child sexual abuse in a U.S. national sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(11–12), 7780–7803. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221149090
46.
Tyers-ChowdhuryA.BinderG. (2021). What we know about the gender digital divide for girls: A literature review. UNICEF.
WalkerK.SleathE. (2017). A systematic review of the current knowledge regarding revenge pornography and non-consensual sharing of sexually explicit media. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 9–24.
49.
WalkerK.SleathE.HatcherR. M.HineB.CrookesR. L. (2021). Nonconsensual sharing of private sexually explicit media among university students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17), NP9078–NP9108.
50.
WaltersG. D.EspelageD. L. (2020). Assessing the relationship between cyber and traditional forms of bullying and sexual harassment: Stepping stones or displacement?Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2020-2-2.
51.
WellsG. A.WellsG.SheaB.SheaB.O’ConnellD.PetersonJ.Welch LososM.TugwellP.GaS. W.ZelloG. A.PetersenJ. A. (2014). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:79550924
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
