Technology-Facilitated Abuse Against Women From Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Abstract

Women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds are particularly vulnerable to domestic and family violence, including technology-facilitated abuse. Often CALD women depend on technology to connect with support networks in their home country. Technology-facilitated abuse can be devastating and isolating. There is limited comprehensive knowledge of how technology-facilitated abuse is experienced by CALD women. This scoping review addresses this gap by exploring and analysing the available literature on technology-facilitated abuse amongst CALD women in the context of domestic and family violence. Employing a scoping review methodology, a total of nine studies were identified from a database search and other sources (including snowball, web search, and search verification processes). Studies were included if they contained the following three elements: (1) a focus on technology-facilitated abuse, (2) the inclusion of CALD women’s experiences, and (3) a context of domestic and family violence (DFV). This review firstly maps the methodologies and characteristics of the studies. Second, the most common types of technology-facilitated abuse that disproportionally affect CALD women are identified together with culturally related help-seeking barriers. Areas for future research are discussed along with suggestions for improving practises and policies for prevention and intervention.

Keywords

technology-facilitated abuse immigrant women CALD domestic and family violence DFV help-seeking barriers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Alosi

(2017). Cyber-violence: Digital abuse in the context of domestic violence. Law Journal, 40(4), 1573–1603. https://doi.org/10.53637/dhuv6093

Al-Alosi

(2019) Technology-facilitated abuse: The new breed of domestic violence (Vol. 10). https://theconversation.com/technology-facilitated-abuse-the-new-breed-of-domestic-violence-74683

Allimant

Ostapiej-Piatkowski

(2011). Supporting women from CALD backgrounds who are victims/survivors of sexual violence (pp. 1–16). Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault (ACSSA) Wrap.

Arksey

O’Malley

(2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Brownridge

D. A.

Halli

S. S.

(2002). Double jeopardy?: Violence against immigrant women in Canada. Violence and victims, 17(4), 455–471.

Caetano

Field

C. A.

Ramisetty-Mikler

McGrath

(2005). The 5-year course of intimate partner violence among white, black, and hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(9), 1039–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505277783

Cardoso

L. F.

Sorenson

S. B.

Webb

Landers

(2019). Recent and emerging technologies: Implications for women’s safety. Technology in Society, 58(1–5), 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.01.001

Dimond

J. P.

Fiesler

Bruckman

A. S.

(2011). Domestic violence and information communication technologies. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.006

Douglas

Burdon

(2018). Legal responses to non-consensual smartphone recordings in the context of domestic and family violence. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 41(1), 157–184. https://doi.org/10.53637/rmsl3175

10.

Douglas

Harris

Dragiewicz

(2019a). Migrant women are particularly vulnerable to technology-facilitated domestic abuse. https://theconversation.com/migrant-women-are-particularly-vulnerable-to-technology-facilitated-domestic-abuse-110270

11.

Douglas

Harris

B. A.

Dragiewicz

(2019b). Technology-facilitated domestic and family violence: women’s experiences. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(3), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy068

12.

Dragiewicz

Burgess

Matamoros-Fernández

Salter

Suzor

N. P.

Woodlock

Harris

(2018). Technology facilitated coercive control: Domestic violence and the competing roles of digital media platforms. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341

13.

Dragiewicz

Harris

Woodlock

Salter

Easton

Lynch

Milne

(2019). Domestic violence and communication technology: Survivor experiences of intrusion, surveillance, and identity crime. Australian communications consumer action network ACCAN. http://accan.org.au/files/Grants/Domestic%20violence%20and%20communication%20technology%20Survivor%20experience%20of%20intrusion%20surveillance%20and%20identity%20crime.pdf

14.

Freed

Palmer

Minchala

Levy

Ristenpart

Dell

(2018). A stalker’s paradise” how intimate partner abusers exploit technology. [Paper presentation]. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, 21–26 April 2018. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3173574.3174241

15.

Ghafournia

Easteal

(2018). Are immigrant women visible in Australian domestic violence reports that potentially influence policy? Laws, 7(4), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7040032

16.

Ghafournia

(2011). Battered at home, played down in policy: Migrant women and domestic violence in Australia. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 16(3), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.02.009

17.

Gonçalves

Matos

(2020). Mental health of multiple victimized immigrant women in Portugal: Does resilience make a difference? Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(3), 353–368.

18.

Harris

(2018). Intimate partner violence, risk and security: Securing women’s lives in a global world. In Fitz-Gibbon

Walklate

McCulloch

Maher

(Eds.), Routledge studies in crime, security and justice (pp. 52–70). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204765-4

19.

Henry

Flynn

Powell

(2020). Technology-facilitated domestic and sexual violence: A review. Violence Against Women, 26(15–16), 1828–1854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219875821

20.

Kulwicki

Aswad

Carmona

Ballout

(2010). Barriers in the utilization of domestic violence services among Arab immigrant women: Perceptions of professionals, service providers and community leaders. Journal of Family Violence, 25(8), 727–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9330-8

21.

Lipsky

Caetano

(2007). The role of race/ethnicity in the relationship between emergency department use and intimate partner violence: Findings from the 2002 national survey on drug use and health. American Journal of Public Health, 97(12), 2246–2252. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.091116

22.

MenjÍVar

Salcido

(2002). Immigrant women and domestic violence: Common experiences in different countries. Gender & Society, 16(6), 898–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124302237894

23.

Messing

Bagwell-Gray

Brown

M. L.

Kappas

Durfee

(2020). Intersections of stalking and technology-based abuse: Emerging definitions, conceptualization, and measurement. Journal of Family Violence, 35(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00114-7

24.

Nduhura

Kim

S. D.

Mumporeze

(2019). When social media are your sole life jacket: A capability analysis of foreign brides’ empowerment by social media in South Korea. Omnes, 9(1), 148–184. https://doi.org/10.14431/omnes.2019.01.9.1.148

25.

Office of the eSafety Commissioner (2019). eSafety for women from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds. The Office comissioned research from the Social Research Centre. https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-07/summary-report-for-women-from-cald-backgrounds.pdf

26.

Powell

Henry

(2016). Technology-facilitated sexual violence victimization: Results from an online survey of Australian adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(17), 3637–3665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516672055

27.

Satyen

Piedra

Ranganathan

Golluccio

(2018). Intimate partner violence and help-seeking behavior among migrant women in Australia. Journal of Family Violence, 33(7), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9980-5

28.

Tsantefski

Wilde

Young

O’Leary

(2018). Inclusivity in interagency responses to domestic violence and child protection. Australian Social Work, 71(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407x.2017.1422775

29.

Vaughan

Murdolo

Murray

Davis

Chen

Block

Quiazon

Warr

(2015). ASPIRE: A multi-site community-based participatory research project to increase understanding of the dynamics of violence against immigrant and refugee women in Australia. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2634-0

30.

Woodlock

Webster

(2013). Smartsafe and the abuse of technology. Parity, 26(2), 27–28.

31.

Woodlock

McKenzie

Western

Harris

(2019). Technology as a weapon in domestic violence: Responding to digital coercive control. Australian Social Work, 73(3), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407x.2019.1607510

32.

Woodlock

(2015a). ReCharge: Women’s technology safety, legal resources, research and training. Women’s legal service NSW, domestic violence resource centre victoria and WESNET. https://www.smartsafe.org.au/sites/default/files/ReCharge-Womens-Technology-Safety-Report-2015.pdf

33.

Weishaar

H. B.

(2008). Consequences of international migration: A qualitative study on stress among Polish migrant workers in Scotland. Public health, 122(11), 1250–1256.

34.

Woodlock

(2015b). Remote control. DVRCV, Advocate,(1), 37–40.

35.

Woodlock

(2017). The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women, 23(5), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216646277

36.

Zaidi

A. U.

Fernando

Ammar

(2015). An exploratory study of the impact of information communication technology (ICT) or computer mediated communication (CMC) on the level of violence and access to service among intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors in Canada. Technology in Society, 41(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.12.003