In recent years the body of literature on cyberstalking has expanded rapidly. The present work aimed to summarize the current state of the literature on cyberstalking perpetration and victimization in a scoping review. Forty-one quantitative and qualitative studies that examined variables relating to cyberstalking victimization and perpetration were collated. Following the methodology of Arksey and O’Malley (2005), an in-depth thematic analysis of the articles was undertaken. Prevalence of victimization and perpetration rates were compared and key themes synthesized. Despite examining similar young adult populations, the prevalence of victimization was found to range considerably from 0.7% (Reyns & Engelbrecht, 2010) to 85.2% (Strawhun et al., 2013) across studies. Themes were divided into two overarching classifications, factors relating to victimization and factors relating to perpetration. Deviant peer association, low self-control, previous harassment experiences and personality traits were some of the factors most frequently examined in relation to perpetration; whilst online exposure, online disclosure and guardianship were some of the factors most frequently examined in relation to victimization. Within these themes, deviant peer association and low self-control were found to consistently correlate with an increase in both cyberstalking victimization and perpetration. Guardianship and confidence online demonstrated inconsistent results. This review has summarized what is currently known and has been validated within cyberstalking research pertaining to victimization and perpetration, and has identified gaps and potential areas of future development.
AbreuR. L.KennyM. C. (2017). Cyberbullying and LGBTQ youth: A systematic literature review and recommendations for prevention and intervention. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 11(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-017-0175-7
2.
AlexyE. M.BurgessA. W.BakerT.SmoyakS. A. (2005). Perceptions of cyberstalking among college students. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 5(3), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/brief-treatment/mhi020
3.
ArkseyH.MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
4.
BackS. (2016). Empirical assessment of cyber harassment victimization via cyber-routine activities theory[Master's Thesis]. Bridgewater State University. Virtual Commonshttps://vc.bridgew.edu/theses/30/
5.
BerryM.BainbridgeS. (2017). Manchester’s cyberstalked 18-30s: Factors affecting cyberstalking. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(18), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.418.3680
6.
BosslerA. M.HoltT. J.MayD. C. (2012). Predicting online harassment victimization among a juvenile population. Youth & Society, 44(4), 500–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X11407525
ChenJ.WaltersM. L.GilbertL. K.PatelN. (2020). Sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence by sexual orientation, United States. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000252
9.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
10.
DardisC.GidyczC. (2017). The frequency and perceived impact of engaging in in-person and cyber unwanted pursuit after relationship break-up among college men and women. A Journal of Research, 76(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0667-1
11.
DekeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D.HarrisB.WoodlockD.NolanJ.Hall-SanchezA. (2019). Technology-facilitated stalking and unwanted sexual messages/images in a college campus community: The role of negative peer support. SAGE Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019828231
12.
DreßingH.BailerJ.AndersA.WagnerH.GallasC. (2014). Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: Prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 17(2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0231
13.
FinnJ. (2004). A survey of online harassment at a university campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(4), 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260503262083
14.
FisselE. R. (2018). The reporting and help seeking behaviours of cyberstalking victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11–12), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518801942
15.
FreemanN.MuravenM. (2010). Self-control depletion leads to increased risk taking. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(2), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609360421
HeinrichP. A. (2015). Generation iStalk: An examination of the prior relationship between victims of stalking and offenders[Master’s ThesisMarshall Digital Scholar]. Marshall University. https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/917/
18.
HensonB.ReynsB. W.FisherB. S. (2013). Fear of crime online? Examining the effect of risk, previous victimization, and exposure on fear of online interpersonal victimization. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 29(4), 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986213507403
19.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behaviour, 29(2), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816
20.
HolmesS. C.JohnsonN. L.ZlotnickC.SullivanT. P.JohnsonD. M. (2020). The association between demographic, mental health, and intimate partner violence victimization variables and undergraduate women’s intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1–2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520907354
21.
HoltT. J.BosslerA. M.MayD. C. (2012). Low self- control, deviant peer associations, and juvenile cyberdeviance. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(3), 378–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12103-011-9117-3
22.
KalaitzakiA. (2020). Cyberstalking victimization and perpetration among young adults: Prevalence and correlates. In Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology. IGI Global, pp.22–38. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1063-6.ch002
23.
KircaburunK.JonasonP. K.GriffithsM. D. (2018). The dark tetrad traits and problematic social media use: The mediating role of cyberbullying and cyberstalking. Personality and Individual Differences, 135(1), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.034
24.
KraftE.WangJ. (2010). An exploratory study of the cyberbullying and cyberstalking experiences and factors related to victimization of students at a public liberal arts college. International Journal of Technoethics, 1(4), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.4018/jte.2010100106
25.
LeeA.HankinB. L. (2009). Insecure attachment, dysfunctional attitudes, and low self-esteem predicting prospective symptoms of depression and anxiety during adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent, 38(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410802698396
26.
LeeB.O’SullivanL. (2014). The ex-factor: Characteristics of online and offline post-relationship contact and tracking among Canadian emerging adults. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2415
27.
LevacD.ColquhounH.O'BrienK. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
28.
LindsayM.KrysikJ. (2012). Online harassment among college students: A replication incorporating new internet trends. Information, Communication & Society: A Decade in Internet Time: The Dynamics of the Internet and Society, 15(5), 703–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.674959
29.
MapleC.ShortE.BrownA. (2011). Cyberstalking in the United Kingdom: An analysis of the ECHO pilot survey. National Centre for Cyberstalking Research: University of Bedfordshire.
30.
MaranD.A.BegottiT. (2019). Prevalence of cyberstalking and previous offline victimization in a sample of Italian university students. Social Sciences, 8(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8010030
31.
MarchE.LittenV.SullivanD. H.WardL. (2020). Somebody that i (used to) know: Gender and dimensions of dark personality traits as predictors of intimate partner cyberstalking. Personality and Individual Differences, 163(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110084
32.
MarcumC.HigginsG.RickettsM. (2014). Juveniles and cyber stalking in the United States: An analysis of theoretical predictors of patterns of online perpetration. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 8(1), 47–56. http://www.cybercrimejournal.com/marcumetalijcc2014vol8issue1.pdf
33.
MarcumC. D.HigginsG. E.NicholsonJ. (2017). I’m watching you: Cyberstalking behaviors of university students in romantic relationships. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9358-2
34.
MarganskiA.MelanderL. (2015). Intimate partner violence victimization in the cyber and real world: Examining the extent of cyber aggression experiences and its association with in-person dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(7), 1071–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515614283
35.
MénardK. S.PincusA. L. (2011). Predicting overt and cyber stalking perpetration by male and female college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(11), 2183–2207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511432144
MunnZ.PetersM. D. J.SternC.TufanaruC.McArthurA.AromatarisE. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
38.
NavarroJ. N.MarcumC. D.HigginsG. E.RickettsM. L. (2016). Addicted to the thrill of the virtual hunt: Examining the effects of internet addiction on the cyberstalking behaviours of juveniles. Deviant Behaviour, 37(8), 893–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1153366
39.
NoblesM.ReynsB.FoxK.FisherB. (2014). Protection against pursuit: A conceptual and empirical comparison of cyberstalking and stalking victimization among a national sample. Justice Quarterly, 31(6), 723030. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.723030.
40.
NovoF.PereiraF.MatosM. (2014). Cyber-aggression among Portuguese adolescents: A study on perpetration, victim offender overlap and parental supervision. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 8(2), 94. https://www.cybercrimejournal.com/novoetalijcc2014vol8issue2.pdf
41.
PaulletK.ChawdhryA. (2020). Cyberstalking: An analysis of students’ online activity. International Journal of Cyber Research and Education, 2(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCRE.2020070101
42.
PereiraF.SpitzbergB. H.MatosM. (2016). Cyber-harassment victimization in Portugal: Prevalence, fear, and help-seeking among adolescents. Computers in Human Behaviour, 62(C), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.039
43.
Quinn-EvansL.KeatleyD. A.ArntfieldM.SheridanL. (2019). A behavior sequence analysis of victims’ accounts of stalking behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(8), 6979–6997. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519831389
44.
ReynsB. W. (2019). Online pursuit in the twilight zone: Cyberstalking perpetration by college students. Victims & Offenders, 14(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2018.1557092
45.
ReynsB.W.FisherB. S.RandaR. (2018). Explaining cyberstalking victimization against college women using a multitheoretical approach: Self-control, opportunity, and control balance. Crime & Delinquency, 64(13), 1742–1764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717753116
46.
ReynsB. W.HensonB.FisherB. S. (2011). Being pursued online: Applying cyberlifestyle–routine activities theory to cyberstalking victimization. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 38(11), 1149–1169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811421448
47.
ReynsB. W.HensonB.FisherB. S. (2012). Stalking in the twilight zone: Extent of cyberstalking victimization and offending among college students. Deviant Behaviour, 33(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2010.538364
48.
ReynsB. W.HensonB.FisherB. S. (2016). Guardians of the cyber galaxy: An empirical and theoretical analysis of the guardianship concept from routine activity theory. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986215621378
SheridanL.P.ScottA.J.CampbellA.M. (2019). Perceptions and experiences of intrusive behavior and stalking: Comparing LGBTIQ and heterosexual groups. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(7), 1388–1409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516651313
51.
ShortE.LinfordS.WheatcroftJ. M.MapleC. (2014). The impact of cyberstalking: The lived experience-a thematic analysis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 199(1), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v3i2.970
52.
Smith-DardenJ. P.KernsmithP. D.VictorB. G.LathropR. A. (2017). Electronic displays of aggression in teen dating relationships: Does the social ecology matter?Computers in Human Behaviour, 67(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.015
53.
SmokerM.MarchE. (2017). Predicting perpetration of intimate partner cyberstalking: Gender and the dark tetrad. Computers in Human Behaviour, 72(1), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.012
54.
SpitzbergB. H.CupachW. R. (2014). The dark side of relationship pursuit: From attraction to obsession and stalking. Routledge.
55.
StrawhunJ.AdamsN.HussM. T. (2013). The assessment of cyberstalking: An expanded examination including social networking, attachment, jealousy, and anger in relation to violence and abuse. Violence and Victims, 28(4), 715. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.11-00145
56.
TamborraT. L. (2012). Poor, urban, battered women who are stalked: How can we include their experiences?. Feminist Criminology, 7(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085111430826
57.
TillyerM. S.WrightE. M. (2014). Intimate partner violence and the victim-offender overlap. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427813484315
58.
TokunagaR. S.AuneK. S. (2017). Cyber-defense: A taxonomy of tactics for managing cyberstalking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(10), 1451–1475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515589564
59.
ToroP. A.UrbergK. A.HeinzeH. J. (2004). Antisocial behavior and affiliation with deviant peers. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 33(2), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3302_15
60.
Van BaakC.HayesB. E. (2018). Correlates of cyberstalking victimization and perpetration among college students. Violence and Victims, 33(6), 1036–1054. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.33.6.1036
61.
Van OuytselJ.PonnetK.WalraveM. (2018). Cyber dating abuse victimization among secondary school students from a lifestyle-routine activities theory perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(17), 2767–2776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516629390
62.
WelshA.LavoieJ. A. A. (2012). Risky eBusiness: An examination of risk-taking, online disclosiveness, and cyberstalking victimization. Cyberpsychology, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2012-1-4
63.
WickS. E.NagoshiC.BashamR.JordanC.KimY. K.NguyenA. P.LehmannP. (2017). Patterns of cyber harassment and perpetration among college students in the United States: A test of routine activities theory. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 11(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.495770
64.
WilsonC.SheridanL.Garratt-ReedD. (2021). What is cyberstalking? A review of measurements. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520985489.
65.
WojciechowskiT.W. (2018). The development of deviant peer association across the life-course and its relevance for predicting offending in early adulthood. Journal of Developmental and Life Course Criminology, 4(6), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-017-0072-7
66.
WolakJ.MitchellK. J.FinkelhorD. (2006). Online victimization of youth: Five years later. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
WorsleyJ. D.WheatcroftJ. M.ShortE.CorcoranR. (2017). Victims’ voices: Understanding the emotional impact of cyberstalking and individuals’ coping responses. SAGE Open, 7(2), 215824401771029. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017710292
69.
WrightM. F. (2018). Cyberstalking victimization, depression, and academic performance: The role of perceived social support from parents. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 21(2), 11–116. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0742
