What Puts Individuals at Risk for Physical Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration? A Meta-Analysis Examining Risk Markers for Men and Women

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration is a serious public health concern around the world. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize all available data examining risk markers for physical IPV perpetration among men and women between 1980 and 2018. Studies were included in the analysis if they examined physical IPV in adult opposite-sex relationships, included statistical information needed to calculate at least one bivariate effect size, and were written in English. A total of 503 studies, yielding 2,972 unique effect sizes, were included in the analysis. Data from these studies allowed for the examination of 63 unique risk markers related to physical IPV perpetration for both men and women, 60 unique risk markers for male perpetration, and 45 unique risk markers for female perpetration. Lastly, we were able to compare the strength of 44 risk markers for physical IPV perpetration between men and women. We found that the strongest risk markers were related to other acts of violence (both perpetration and victimization) as well as relationship dynamics. Results from this study highlight the potential factors that could be focused on in prevention programming and intervention work. Additionally, it was found that 9 out of 44 risk markers significantly differed in strength for men and women, allowing for additional specificity in intervention work for helping professionals working with either male or female perpetrators of physical IPV.

Keywords

domestic violence intervention/treatment anything related to domestic violence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Borenstein

Hedges

Higgins

Rothstein

(2014). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 3) [Computer software]. Biostat.

Borenstein

Hedges

L. V.

Higgins

J. P. T.

Rothstein

H. R.

(2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley.

Borenstein

Hedges

L. V.

Higgins

J. P. T.

Rothenstein

H. R.

(2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12

Breiding

M. J.

Smith

S. G.

Basile

K. C.

Walters

M. L.

Chen

Merrick

M. T.

(2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. MMWR, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 63(SS08), 1–18.

Cafferky

B. M.

Mendez

Anderson

J. R.

Stith

S. M.

(2018). Substance use and intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Violence, 8(1), 110.

Campbell

J. C

. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359, 1131–1136.

Card

N. A.

(2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. Guilford Press.

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Coker

A. L.

Davis

K. E.

Arias

Desai

Sanderson

Brandt

H. M.

Smith

P. H.

(2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 23(4), 206–268.

10.

Cooper

Vetere

(2005). Domestic violence and family safety: A systemic approach to working with violence in families. Whurr Publishers.

11.

Devries

K. M.

Mak

J. Y.

Bacchus

L. J.

Child

J. C.

Falder

Petzold

Astbury

Watts

C. H

. (2013). Intimate partner violence and incident depressive symptoms and suicide attempts: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. PLoS Medicine, 10, e1001439.

12.

Dutton

D. G.

(1995). The domestic assault of women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives. UBC Press.

13.

Duval

Tweedie

(2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463.

14.

García-Moreno

Jansen

H. A.

Ellsberg

Heise

Watts

. (2005). WHO multicountry study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. World Health Organization.

15.

Hawkins

Blanchard

Baldwin

Fawcett

(2008). Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 723–734.

16.

Hines

D. A.

Douglas

E. M

. (2010). Intimate terrorism by women toward men: Does it exist? Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 2, 36–56.

17.

Hunter

J. E.

Schmidt

F. L.

(Eds.). (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage.

18.

James

Brody

Hamilton

(2013). Risk factors for domestic violence during pregnancy: A meta-analytic review. Violence and Victims, 28(3), 359–375.

19.

Johnson

M. P.

(2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Northeastern University.

20.

Kimmes

J. G.

Mallory

A. B.

Spencer

C. M.

Beck

A. R.

Cafferky

Stith

S. M.

(2019). A meta-analysis of risk markers for intimate partner violence in same-sex relationships. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(3), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017708784

21.

Knudson-Martin

(2013). Why power matters: Creating a foundation of mutual support in couple relationships. Family Process, 52(1), 5–19.

22.

Krebs

Breiding

M. J.

Browne

Warner

(2011). The association between different types of intimate partner violence experienced by women. Journal of Family Violence, 26(6), 487–500.

23.

Langhinrichsen-Rohling

McCullars

Misra

T. A.

(2012). Motivations for men and women’s intimate partner violence perpetration: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 429–468.

24.

Leisring

P. A.

Grigorian

H. L.

(2016). Self-defense, retaliation, and gender: Clarifying motivations for physical partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 31(8), 949–953.

25.

Love

H. A.

Spencer

C. M.

May

Mendez

Stith

S. M.

(2018). Perpetrator risk markers for intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018801331

26.

Mallory

A. B.

Dharnidharka

Deitz

S. L.

Barros-Gomes

Cafferky

Stith

S. M.

Van

(2016). A meta-analysis of cross cultural risk markers for intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 116–126.

27.

Marshall

A. D.

Holtzworth-Munroe

(2002). Varying forms of husband sexual aggression: Predictors and subgroup differences. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(3), 286–296.

28.

Mayseless

(1991). Adult attachment patterns and courtship violence. Family Relations, 40(1), 21–28.

29.

McDonald

Jouriles

E. N.

Tart

C. D.

Minze

L. C.

(2009). Children’s adjustment problems in families characterized by men’s severe violence toward women: Does other family violence matter? Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 94–101.

30.

Oram

Trevillion

Khalifeh

Feder

Howard

L. M.

(2014). Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychiatric disorder and the perpetration of partner violence. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 23, 361–376.

31.

Rosenthal

(1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641.

32.

Smith-Marek

E. N.

Dominguez

M. M.

Cafferky

Spencer

C. M.

Van

Stith

Oliver

M. A

. (2016). Military/civilian risk markers for intimate partner violence: A meta-analysis. Violence and Victims, 31(5), 787–818.

33.

Smith

S. G.

Chen

Basile

K. C.

Gilbert

L. K.

Merrick

M. T.

Patel

Walling

Jain

. (2017). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010–2012 state report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-StateReportBook.pdf

34.

Spencer

C. M.

Cafferky

Stith

S. M.

(2016). Gender differences in risk markers for perpetration of physical partner violence: Results from a meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 31(8), 981–984.

35.

Spencer

C. M.

Mallory

A. B.

Cafferky

B. M.

Kimmes

J. G.

Beck

A. R.

Stith

S. M.

(2019). Mental health factors and intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Violence, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000156

36.

Spencer

C. M.

Mendez

Stith

S. M

. (2019). The role of income inequality on risk markers for intimate partner violence: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.010

37.

Spencer

C. M.

Stith

S. M.

Cafferky

. (2018). Risk markers for physical intimate partner violence victimization: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.10.009

38.

Stark

(2002). Physiology and faith: Addressing the “universal” gender difference in religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(3), 495–507.

39.

Stith

S. M.

Green

N. M.

Smith

D. B.

Ward

D. B.

(2008). Marital satisfaction and marital discord as risk markers for intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 23(3), 149–160.

40.

Stith

S. M.

McCollum

E. E.

Rosen

K. H.

(2011). Couples therapy for domestic violence: Finding safe solutions. American Psychological Association.

41.

Stith

S. M.

Smith

D. B.

Penn

C. E.

Ward

D. B.

Tritt

(2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(1), 65–98.

42.

Straus

M. A.

(2005). Women’s violence toward men is a serious social problem. In Gelles &

R. J.

Loseke

D. R.

(Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 55–77). Sage.

43.

Straus

M. A.

(2011). Gender symmetry and mutuality in perpetration of clinical-level partner violence: Empirical evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 279–288.

44.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies (2008). Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings (DHHS publication No. SMA 08–4343, NSDUH series H-34). Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

45.

Swan

S. C.

Gambone

L. J.

Caldwell

J. E.

Sullivan

T. P.

Snow

D. L.

(2008). A review of research on women’s use of violence with male intimate partners. Violence and Victims, 23, 301–314.

46.

Thompson

E. H.

Remmes

K. R.

(2002). Does masculinity thwart being religious? An examination of older men’s religiousness. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(3), 521–532.

47.

Yllo

K. A

. (2005). Through a feminist lens: Gender, diversity, and violence: Extending the feminist framework. In Loseke

D. R.

Gelles

R. J.

Cavanaugh

M. M.

(Eds.), Current controversies of family violence (2nd ed., pp. 19–34). Sage.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB