Family violence is recognized as the violence toward a family member that is threatening, coercive, controlling, dominating, and causes people to fear for their safety and well-being; this complex problem primarily affects women and children. In order to enhance women and children’s safety, Men’s Behavior Change Programs (MBCPs) aim to achieve change in perpetrators’ violent behaviors, by making men accountable and responsible for their actions. The objective of this rapid review was to examine MBCP content, implementation, and the impact on participant and family outcomes. Thirteen articles and 10 MBCPs were identified, using PRISMA guidelines, electronic database searches, and an inclusion criteria of English peer-reviewed articles examining MBCPs or domestic violence perpetrator programs with male perpetrators of family/domestic/intimate partner violence as program participants. The findings of this review indicated a limited evidence base of detailed MBCP evaluations. Information relating to program content was included for nine MBCPs and covered a wide range of topics. None of the articles examined the links between men’s accountability and responsibility to the safety and well-being of women and children. Also, none of the articles included assessments of integrity of program delivery, system processes, or evaluations based on program logics. Positive changes were reported for MBCP participants, including communication, parenting, interpersonal relationships, aggression, abuse, responsibility for behavior, self-awareness power and control tactics, empathy, skills development, cognitive beliefs, behavior control, and abusiveness patterns. A whole family approach was utilized by some of the programs and one article reported on family outcomes.
AshburnK.KernerB.OjamugeD.LundgrenR. (2017). Evaluation of the Responsible, Engaged, and Loving (REAL) Fathers Initiative on physical child punishment and intimate partner violence in Northern Uganda. Prevention Science, 18, 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0713-9
BestJ. (1999). Random violence: How we talk about new crimes and new victims. University of California Press.
9.
BlatchC.O’SullivanK.DelaneyJ. J.van DoornG.SwellerT. (2016). Evaluation of an Australian domestic abuse program for offending males. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 8, 4–20.
10.
BroadyT. R.GrayR.GaffneyI. (2014). Taking responsibility: A psychological profile of men attending a domestic violence group work intervention program in New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2610–2629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513517300
11.
BroadyT. R.GrayR.GaffneyI.LewisP. (2015). ‘I miss my little one a lot’: How father love motivates change in men who have used violence. Child Abuse Review, 26, 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2381
12.
BrownT.HampsonR. (2009). An evaluation of interventions with domestic violence perpetrators. Monash University Printing.
13.
CarbajosaP.BoiraS.MarcuelloC. (2013). Context of treatment and therapeutic alliance: Critical factors in court mandated batterer intervention programs. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.43
14.
CarbajosaP.Catalá-MiñanaA.LilaM.GraciaE.BoiraS. (2017). Responsive versus treatment-resistant perpetrators in batterer intervention programs: Personal characteristics and stages of change. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24, 936–950.
ConnorsA. D.MillsJ. F.GrayA. L. (2013). Intimate partner violence intervention for high-risk offenders. Psychological Services, 10, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028979
17.
Council of Australian Governments. (2009). National plan to reduce violence against women and their children. Commonwealth of Australia. Viewed September 16, 2019.
DayA.VlaisR.ChungD.GreenD. J. (2019, January). Evaluation readiness, program quality and outcomes in men’s behaviour change programs [Research report]. ANROWS.
20.
EllsbergM.ArangoD. J.MortonM.GennariF.KiplesundS.ContrerasM.WattsC. (2014). Prevention of violence against women and girls: What does the evidence say?The Lancet, 385, 1555–1566.
21.
FloodM. (2009). Bent straights: Diversity and flux among heterosexual men. In OleksyE. H. (Ed.), Intimate citizenships: Gender, sexualities, politics (pp. 223–240). Routledge.
22.
GrayR.BroadyT.GaffneyI.LewisP. (2015). How women perceive men who attend domestic violence programs. Communities, Children and Families Australia, 9, 71–84.
23.
GrayR.BroadyT.GaffneyI.LewisP.MokanyT.O’NeillB. (2014). ‘I’m working towards getting back together’: Client accounts of motivation related to relationship status in men’s behaviour change programmes in New South Wales, Australia. Child Abuse Review, 25, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2318
24.
GrayR.LewisP.MokanyT.O’NeilB. (2014). Peer discussion and client motivation in men’s domestic violence programs: An Australian qualitative interview study. Australian Social Work, 67, 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2013.853196
25.
GrealyC.WallaceA.WilczynskiA.LaiS.BodiamT.DowlerB.JonesL. (2013). Literature review on domestic violence perpetrators [Research report]. URBIS.
26.
HolderR. (2001). Domestic and family violence: Criminal justice interventions. Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse, University of New South Wales.
27.
KeelM. (2004). Family violence and sexual assault in Indigenous communities: ‘Walking the talk’ [Briefing No. 4]. Australian Institute of Family Studies.
28.
KellyL.WestmarlandN. (2015). Domestic violence perpetrator programmes: Steps towards change. Project Mirabal final report. London Metropolitan University and Durham University.
29.
LaskeyP.BatesE. A.TaylorJ. C. (2019). A systematic literature review of intimate partner violence victimisation: An inclusive review across gender and sexuality. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 47, 1–11.
30.
LilaM.GraciaE.Catalá-MiñanaA. (2018). Individualized motivational plans in batterer intervention programs: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86, 309.
31.
LoveA. R.MorlandL. A.MenezU.TaftC.MacDonaldA.MackintoshM. A. (2015). “Strength at Home” intervention for male veterans perpetrating intimate partner aggression: Perceived needs survey of therapists and pilot effectiveness study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 2344–2362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514552445
32.
MackayE.GibsonA.LamH.BeechamD. (2015). Perpetrator interventions in Australia: State of knowledge paper(Landscapes: State of knowledge. Issue PP01/2015). ANROWS.
33.
McLaughlinJ. A.JordanG. B. (2015). Using logic models. In NewcomerK. E.HatryH. P.WholeyJ. S. (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 7–32). John Wiley & Sons.
34.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264–269.
SemiatinJ. N.MurphyC. M.ElliottJ. D. (2013). Observed behavior during group treatment for partner-violent men: Acceptance of responsibility and promotion of change. Psychology of Violence, 3, 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029846
38.
ThomasB.CiliskaD.DobbinsM.MicucciS. (2004). A process for systematically reviewing the literature: Providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 1, 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04006.x/full
WebsterK. (2016, July). A preventable burden: Measuring and addressing the prevalence and health impacts of intimate partner violence in Australian women (ANROWS Compass). ANROWS.
