The U.S. Department of Justice estimates that between 149,200 and 209,400 incidents of sexual victimization occur annually in prisons and jails. However, very few individuals experiencing sexual victimization during incarceration report these incidents to correctional authorities. Federal-level policy recommendations derived from the Prison Rape Elimination Act suggest mechanisms for improving reporting as well as standards for the prevention, investigation, and prosecution of prison-based sexual victimization. Despite these policy recommendations, sexual assault persists in prisons and jails, with only 8% of prisoners who experience sexual assault reporting their victimization. This review focuses on gaps in the existing research about what factors influence whether adult victims in incarcerated systems will report that they have been sexually assaulted. Using ecological theory to guide this review, various levels of social ecology are incorporated, illuminating a variety of factors influencing the reporting of sexual victimization during incarceration. These factors include the role of individual-level behavior, assault characteristics, the unique aspects and processes of the prison system, and the social stigma that surrounds individuals involved in the criminal/legal system. This review concludes with recommendations for future research, policy, and practice, informed by an ecological conceptualization of reporting.
AhrensC. E.CabralG.AbelingS. (2009). Healing or hurtful: Sexual assault survivors’ interpretations of social reactions from support providers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 81–94.
2.
BachmanR. (1998). The factors related to rape reporting behavior and arrest new evidence from the national crime victimization survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 8–29.
3.
BaroA. L. (1997). Spheres of consent: An analysis of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of women incarcerated in the state of Hawaii. Women and Criminal Justice, 8, 61–84.
4.
BaumerE. P. (2002). Neighborhood disadvantage and police notification by victims of violence. Criminology, 40, 579–616.
5.
BeckA. J.HarrisonP. M. (2007). Sexual victimization in state and federal prisons reported by inmates, 2007. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
BeckA. J.HarrisonP. M.BerzofskyM.CasparR.KrebsC. (2010). Sexual victimization in prisons and jails reported by inmates, 2008-09. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
7.
BeckA. J.JohnsonC. (2012). Sexual victimization reported by former state prisoners, 2008. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
8.
BrennerH.DarcyK.FedockG.KubiakS. (In press). Bars to justice: The impact of rape myths on incarcerated women. Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law.
9.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BronfenbrennerU. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–740.
11.
BronfenbrennerU. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In MoenP.ElderG. H.JrLuscherK. (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619–647). Washington, DC: APA Books.
12.
Bryant-DavisT.ChungH.TillmanS.BelcourtA. (2009). From the margins to the center: Ethnic minority women and the mental health effects of sexual assault. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 330–357.
13.
BurtM. R. (1991). Rape myths and acquaintance rape. In ParrotA.BechhoferL. (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 26–40). New York, NY: Wiley.
14.
CampbellR. (2006). Rape survivors experiences with the legal and medical systems: Do rape victim advocates make a difference. Violence Against Women, 12, 30–45.
15.
CampbellR. (2008). The psychological impact of rape victims. American Psychologist, 63, 702–717.
CampbellR.DworkinE.CabralG. (2009). An ecological model of the impact of sexual assault on women’s mental health. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 225–246.
18.
CampbellR.PattersonD.BybeeD. (2012). Prosecution of adult sexual assault cases: A longitudinal analysis of the impact of a sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program. Violence Against Women, 18, 223–244.
19.
CampbellR.RajaS. (2005). The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help seeking experiences with military and civilian social systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 97–105.
20.
CampbellR.TownsendS. M. (2011). Defining the scope of sexual violence. In RenzettiC.EdlesonJ.BergenR. (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (2nd ed., pp. 95–109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
ChenY.UllmanS. E. (2010). Women’s reporting of sexual and physical assaults to police in the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence against Women, 16, 262–279.
22.
Clay-WarnerJ.BurtC. H. (2005). Rape reporting after reforms: Have times really changed?Violence Against Women, 11, 150–176.
23.
DaftR. L. (2001). Organization theory and design. London, England: Thomson Learning.
24.
DullR. L. (2007). Understanding proper exhaustion: Using the special-circumstances test to fill the gaps under Woodford v. Ngo and provide incentives for effective prison grievance procedures. Iowa Law Review, 92, 1929–1967.
25.
DuMontJ.MillerK.MyhrT. L. (2003). The role of ‘real rape’ and ‘real victim’: Stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9, 466–486.
26.
EdwardsK. M.TurchikJ. A.DardisC. M.ReynoldsN.GidyczC. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65, 761–773.
27.
FelsonR. B.ParéP. P. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 597–610.
28.
FisherB. S.DaigleL. E.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: Results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 6–38.
29.
FleischerM. S.KrienertJ. L. (2006). The culture of prison sexual violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
30.
FowlerS. K.BlackburnA. G.MarquartJ. W.MullingsJ. L. (2010). Would they officially report an in-prison sexual assault? An examination of inmate perceptions. The Prison Journal, 90, 220–243.
31.
FrazierP. A.HaneyB. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 607–628.
32.
GarlandB.WilsonG. (2012). Prison inmates’ view on whether reporting rape is the same thing as snitching: An exploratory study and research agenda. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 1201–1222.
33.
GartnerR.MacmillanR. (1995). Effect of victim-offender relationship on reporting crimes of violence against women. The Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 393–429.
34.
GeerM. A. (2000). Human rights and wrongs in our own backyard: Incorporating international human rights protections under domestic civil rights law—A case study of women in United States prisons. Harvard Journal of Human Rights, 13, 71–103.
35.
GoffmanE. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
36.
GoudriaanH.LynchJ. P.NieuwbeertaP. (2004). Reporting to the police in western nations: A theoretical analysis of the effects of social context. Justice Quarterly, 21, 933–969.
37.
GoudriaanH.NieuwbeertaP. (2007). Contextual determinants of juveniles’ willingness to report crimes. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 89–111.
38.
GreenfeldL.RandM. R.CravenD.KlausP. A.PerkinsC. A.RingelC.…FoxJ. A. (1998). Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends. In Bureau of Justice Statistics Factbook (#NCJ-167237). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
39.
GuerinoP.BeckA. J. (2011). Sexual victimization reported by adult correctional authorities, 2007–2008 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report 231172). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
40.
HearnJ.ParkinW. (2001). Gender, sexuality and violence in organizations: The unspoken forces of organization violations. New York, NY: Sage.
41.
HeathN. M.LynchS. M.FritchA. M.McArthurL. N.SmithS. L. (2011). Silent survivors rape myth acceptance in incarcerated women’s narratives of disclosure and reporting of rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 596–610.
42.
HensleyC.CastleT.TewksburyR. (2003). Inmate-to-inmate sexual coercion in a prison for women. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 37, 77–87.
43.
Human Rights Watch. (1996). All too familiar: Sexual abuse of women in U.S. state prisons. New York, NY: The Author.
44.
Human Rights Watch. (2001). No escape: Male rape in U.S. prisons. New York, NY: The Author.
45.
IfeJ. (2012). Human rights and social work: Towards a rights-based practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
46.
JonesJ. S.AlexanderC.WynnB. N.RossmanL.DunnuckC. (2009). Why women don’t report sexual assault to the police: The influence of psychosocial variables and traumatic injury. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 36, 417–424.
47.
JordanJ. (2004). Beyond belief? Policy, rape, and women’s credibility. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 4, 29–59.
48.
KellyJ. G. (1966). Ecological constraints on mental health services. American Psychologist, 21, 535–539.
49.
KellyJ. G. (1968). Toward an ecological conception of preventive interventions. In CarterJ. W.Jr, (Ed.), Research contributions from psychology to community mental health (pp. 75–99). New York, NY: Behavioral.
50.
KennedyA. C.AdamsA.BybeeD.CampbellR.KubiakS. P.SullivanC. (2012). A model of sexually and physically victimized women’s process of attaining effective formal help over time: The role of social location, context, and interventions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 217–228.
51.
KilpatrickD. G.ResnickH. S.RuggieroK. J.ConoscentiL. M.McCauleyJ. (2007). Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: A national study. Charleston: Medical University of South Carolina, National Crime Victims Research & Treatment Center.
52.
KubiakS. P.HannaJ.BaltonM. (2005). “I came to prison to do my time—Not to get raped”: Coping within the institutional setting. Stress, Trauma, and Crisis, 8, 157–178.
KupersT. A. (2005). Toxic masculinity as a barrier to mental health treatment in prison. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 713–724.
55.
LabelleD. (2008). Bringing human rights home to the world of detention. Columbia Human Rights Legal Review, 40, 79–133.
56.
LarcombeW. (2002). The ideal victim v successful rape complainants: Not what you might expect. Feminist Legal Studies, 10, 131–148.
57.
LichtyL. F.CampbellR.SchuitemanJ. (2008). Developing a university-wide institutional response to sexual assault and relationship violence. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 36, 5–22.
58.
LittletonH. L.AxsomD.BreitkopfC. R.BerensonA. (2006). Rape acknowledgment and postassault experiences: How acknowledgment status relates to disclosure, coping, worldview, and reactions received from others. Violence and Victims, 21, 761–778.
59.
LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1994). Rape myths in review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.
60.
MadiganL.GambleN. (1991). The second rape: Society’s continued betrayal of the victim. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
61.
ManC. D.CronanJ. P. (2001). Forecasting sexual abuse in prison: The prison subculture of masculinity as a backdrop for deliberate indifference. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 92, 127–186.
62.
MartinP. Y.PowellR. M. (1994). Accounting for the “second assault”: Legal organizations’ framing of rape victims. Law & Social Inquiry, 19, 853–890.
63.
McGregorM. J.WiebeE.MarionS. ALivingstoneC. (2000). Why don’t more women report sexual assault to the police? (Research letter). Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162, 659–662.
64.
MénardK. S. (2003). Sexual victimization reporting: The effects of individual and county factors on victims’ decision to report to the police. University Park: College of the Liberal Arts, The Pennsylvania State University.
65.
MénardK. S. (2005). Reporting sexual assault: A social ecology perspective. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly.
MorashM.JeongS.BohmertM. N.BushD. R. (2012). Men’s vulnerability to prisoner-on-prisoner sexual violence a state correctional system case study. The Prison Journal, 92, 290–311.
68.
OrchowskiL. M.MeyerD. H.GidyczC. A. (2009). College women’s likelihood to report unwanted sexual experiences to campus agencies: Trends and correlates. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18, 839–858.
69.
OwenB. A.WellsJ. (2006). Staff perspectives: Sexual violence in adult prisons & jails. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
70.
OwenB. A.WellsJ.PollockJ.MuscatB.TorresS. (2008). Gendered violence and safety: A contextual approach to improving security in women’s facilities. Fresno: California State University.
71.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape Myth Acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68.
72.
PetersonZ. D.MuehlenhardC. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51, 129–144.
73.
PinoN. W.MeierR. F. (1999). Gender differences in rape reporting. Sex Roles, 40, 979–990.
74.
PlantyM.LangtonL.KrebsC.BerzofskyM.Smiley-McDonaldH. (2013). Female victims of sexual violence, 1994-2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
75.
PooleH. (2006). Process mapping. In JuppV. (Ed.), The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods (pp. 239–240). London: Sage.
RennisonC. M. (2002). Rape and sexual assault: Reporting to police and medical attention, 1992-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
79.
RoseV. M.RandallS. C. (1982). The impact of investigator perceptions of victim legitimacy on the processing of rape/sexual assault cases. Symbolic Interaction, 5, 23–36.
80.
SableM. R.DanisF.MauzyD. L.GallagherS. K. (2006). Barriers to reporting sexual assault for women and men: Perspectives of college students. Journal of American College Health, 55, 157–162.
81.
SabrinaC.HoL. Y. (2014). Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: Disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 15, 201–226.
82.
SchlangerM. (2003). Inmate litigation. Harvard Law Review, 115, 1555–1706.
83.
SchlangerM.ShayG. (2009). Preserving the rule of law in America’s jails and prisons: The case for amending the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Journal of Constitutional Law, 11, 139–154.
84.
SingerM. (2013). Prison rape: An American institution?Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
85.
SmithB. V. (2001). Sexual abuse against women in prison. Criminal Justice, 16, 30–55.
86.
SmithB. V. (2005). Sexual abuse of women in United States prisons: A modern corollary of slavery. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 33, 571–602.
87.
SmithB. V. (2007). Prison Rape Elimination Act: Implementation and unresolved issues. Criminal Law Brief, 3, 10–18.
88.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2012). The criminal justice system’s response to sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 18, 169–192.
89.
StempleL.MeyerI. H. (2014). The sexual victimization of men in America: New data challenge old assumptions. American Journal of Public Health, 104, e19–e26.
90.
Struckman-JohnsonC.Struckman-JohnsonD.RuckerL.BumbyK.DonaldsonS. (1996). Sexual coercion reported by men and women in prison. Journal of Sex Research, 33(1), 67–76.
91.
Struckman-JohnsonC.Struckman-JohnsonD. (2006). A comparison of sexual coercion experiences reported by men and women in prison. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1591–1615.
92.
Struckman-JohnsonC.Struckman-JohnsonD. (2013). Stopping prison rape: The evolution of standards recommended by PREA’s National Prison Rape Elimination Commission. The Prison Journal, 93, 335–354.
93.
TeasdaleB.DaigleL. E.HawkS. R.DaquinJ. C. (2015). Violent victimization in the prison context: An examination of the gendered contexts of prison. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. doi:10.1177/0306624X15572351
94.
TewksburyR.MahoneyM. J. (2009). Sexual victimization and requests for assistance in inmates’ letters to the National Prison Rape Elimination Commission. Federal Probation, 73, 57–61.
95.
TillmanS.Bryant-DavisT.SmithK.MarksA. (2010). Shattering silence: Exploring barriers to disclosure for African American sexual assault survivors. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 11, 59–70.
96.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the national violence against women survey: Research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
97.
TrickettE. J.KellyJ. G.VincentT. A. (1985). The spirit of ecological inquiry in community research. In SusskindE.KleinD. (Eds.), Community research: Methods, Paradigms, and Applications (pp. 283–333). New York, NY: Praeger.
98.
TurchikJ. A.EdwardsK. M. (2012). Myths about male rape: A literature review. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 211–226.
99.
TurchikJ. A.WilsonS. M. (2010). Sexual assault in the US military: A review of the literature and recommendations for the future. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 267–277.
100.
UllmanS. E. (2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society’s response to survivors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
101.
U.S. Department of Justice. (1994). The criminal justice and community response to rape. Washington, DC: Author.
102.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2012, 620). National standards to prevent, detect, and respond to prison rape: Final rule. Code of Federal Regulations, title 28, part 115. Federal Register, 77, 37106–37232.
103.
WeissK. G. (2010). Male sexual victimization: Examining men’s experiences of rape and sexual assault. Men and Masculinities, 12, 275–298.
104.
WolffN.BlitzC.ShiJ. (2007). Rates of sexual victimization inside prison for inmates with and without mental disorders. Psychiatric Services, 58, 1087–1094.
105.
WolffN.BlitzC. L.ShiJ.BachmanR.SiegelJ. (2006). Sexual violence inside prison: Rates of victimization. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 835–848.
106.
WolffN.BlitzC. L.ShiJ.SiegelJ.BachmanR. (2007). Physical violence inside prisons: Rates of victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 588–599.
107.
WolffN.ShiJ. (2011). Patterns of victimization and feelings of prison: The experience of male and female inmates. Crime & Delinquency, 57, 29–55.
108.
WolffN.ShiJ.BachmanR. (2008). Measuring victimization inside prison: Questioning the questions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1343–1362.
