Victims of sexual assault are often advised to have a medical forensic exam and sexual assault kit (SAK; also termed a “rape kit”) to preserve physical evidence (e.g., semen, blood, and/or saliva samples) to aid in the investigation and prosecution of the crime. Law enforcement are tasked with submitting the rape kit to a forensic laboratory for DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) analysis, which can be instrumental in identifying offenders in previously unsolved crimes, confirming identify in known-offender assaults, discovering serial rapists, and exonerating individuals wrongly accused. However, a growing number of media stories, investigative advocacy projects, and social science studies indicate that police are not routinely submitting SAKs for forensic testing, and instead rape kits are placed in evidence storage, sometimes for decades. This review article examines the growing national problem of untested rape kits by summarizing current research on the number of untested SAKs in the United States and exploring the underlying reasons why police do not submit this evidence for DNA testing. Recommendations for future research that can guide policy and practice are discussed.
AbbeyA.McAuslanP. (2004). A longitudinal examination of male college students’ perpetration of sexual assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 747–756.
2.
AbbeyA.WegnerR.PierceJ.Jacques-TiuraA. J. (2012). Patterns of sexual aggression in a community sample of young men: Risk factors associated with persistence, desistance, and initiation over a 1-year interval. Psychology of Violence, 2, 1–15.
ArchambaultJ.LonswayK. A.O’DonnellP. (2014). Understanding the role of DNA evidence in a sexual assault investigation part 6: Policy responses, assessment, and recommendations for practice. Addy, WA: End Violence Against Women International.
5.
BanksA. (2002). Polypharmacy of posttraumatic stress disorder. Medical Psychiatry, 17, 151–174.
6.
BashfordM. (2013, 3). How New York city tackled its backlog. Webinar presented for the National Center for Victims of Crime, Washinton DC.
7.
BeichnerD.SpohnC. (2005). Prosecutorial charging decisions in sexual assault cases: Examining the impact of a specialized prosecution unit. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 461–498.
8.
BersonS. B. (2009). Debating DNA collection. NIJ Journal, 264, 9–13.
9.
ButlerJ. M. (2005). Forensic DNA typing: Biology, technology, and genetics of STR markers. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
10.
ButlerJ. M. (2010). Fundamentals of forensic DNA typing. Boston, MA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
11.
ButlerJ. M. (2012). Advanced topics in forensic DNA typing: Methodology. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
12.
CaldwellM. F. (2010). Study characteristics and recidivism base rates in juvenile sex offender recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 197–212.
13.
CampbellR. (2005). What really happened? A validation study of rape survivors’ help-seeking experiences with the legal and medical systems. Violence & Victims, 20, 55–68.
14.
CampbellR. (2008). The psychological impact of rape victims’ experiences with the legal, medical, and mental health systems. American Psychologist, 68, 702–717.
15.
CampbellR.BybeeD.KelleyK. D.DworkinE. R.PattersonD. (2012). The impact of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) program services on law enforcement investigational practices: A mediational analysis. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 39, 169–184.
16.
CampbellR.DworkinE.Fehler-CabralG. (2009). An ecological model of the impact of sexual assault on women’s mental health. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 225–246.
17.
CampbellR.GreesonM. R.BybeeD.Fehler-CabralG. (2012). Adolescent sexual assault victims and the legal system: Building community relationships to increase prosecution rates. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 141–154.
18.
CampbellR.PattersonD.BybeeD. (2012). Prosecution of adult sexual assault cases: A longitudinal analysis of the impact of a sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program. Violence Against Women, 18, 223–244.
19.
CampbellR.PattersonD.BybeeD.DworkinE. (2009). Predicting sexual assault prosecution outcomes: The role of medical forensic evidence collected by sexual assault nurse examiners (SANEs). Criminal Justice & Behavior, 36, 712–727.
20.
CampbellR.PattersonD.LichtyL. F. (2005). The effectiveness of sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program: A review of psychological, medical, legal, and community outcomes. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse: A Review Journal, 6, 313–329.
21.
CampbellR.RajaS. (2005). The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help-seeking experiences in military and civilian social systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 97–106.
22.
CaringellaS. (2008). Addressing rape reform in law and practice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
23.
CrossT.WalshW.SimoneM.JonesL. (2003). Prosecution of child abuse: A meta-analysis of rates of criminal justice decisions. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 4, 323–340.
24.
Department of Justice. (2013). A national protocol for sexual assault medical forensic examinations: Adults & adolescents (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
25.
Du MontJ.WhiteD. (2007) The uses and impacts of medico-legal evidence in sexual assault cases: A global review. Geneva, Switzerland: The World Health Organization.
26.
Du MontJ.WhiteD.McGregorM. J. (2009). Investigating the medical forensic examination from the perspectives of sexually assaulted women. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 774–780.
FilipasH. H.UllmanS. E. (2001). Social reactions to sexual assault victims from various support sources. Violence and Victims, 16, 673–692.
29.
FoaE. B.KeaneT. M.FriedmanM. J. (Eds.). (2000). Effective treatments for PTSD: Practice guidelines from the international society for traumatic stress studies. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30.
GarfinkelS. N.LiberzonI. (2009). A review of neuroimaging findings. Psychiatric Annals, 39, 370–381.
31.
GrossS. R. (2008). Convicting the innocent (University of Michigan Public Law Working Paper (103)). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
32.
GrossS. R.JacobyK.MathesonD. J.MontgomeryN.PatilS. (2005). Exonerations in the United States 1989 through 2003. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 95, 523–560.
33.
GrossS. R.ShafferM. (2012). Exonerations in the United States, 1989–2012 (University of Michigan Public Law Working Paper (277)). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
34.
HermanJ. L. (2002). Posttraumatic stress disorder: A comprehensive text? Treating psychological trauma and PTSD. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1452–1453.
35.
Human Rights Watch. (2009). Testing justice: The rape kit backlog in Los Angeles city and county. New York, NY: Author.
36.
Human Rights Watch. (2010). “I used to think the law would protect me” Illinois’s failure to test rape kits. New York, NY: Author.
37.
International Association of Forensic Nurses (IAFN). (2009). Forensic nursing: Scope and standards of practice. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association.
38.
JoblingM. A.GillP. (2004). Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 739–752.
39.
JohnsonD.PetersonJ.SommersI.BaskinD. (2012). Use of forensic science in investigating crimes of sexual violence: Contrasting its theoretical potential with empirical realities. Violence Against Women, 18, 193–222.
40.
LaFreeG. D. (1981). Official reactions to social problems: Police decisions in sexual assault cases. Social Problems, 28, 582–594.
41.
LedrayL. E. (1999). Sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) development and operations guide. Washington, DC: Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Department of Justice.
LisakD.GardinierL.NicksaS. C.CoteA. M. (2010). False allegations of sexual assault: An analysis of ten years of reported cases. Violence Against Women, 16, 1318–1334.
44.
LisakD.MillerP. M. (2002). Repeat rape and multiple offending among undetected rapists. Violence & Victims, 17, 73–84.
45.
LongJ. G.KristianssonV.Whitman-BarrC. (2015). Establishing penetration in sexual assault cases. Aequitas in Brief, 24, 1–8.
46.
LonswayK. A. (2010). Trying to move the elephant in the living room: Responding to the challenge of false rape reports. Violence Against Women, 16, 1356–1371.
47.
LonswayK. A.ArchambaultJ. (2012). The “justice gap” for sexual assault cases: Future directions of research and reform. Violence Against Women, 18, 145–168.
48.
LonswayK. A.ArchambaultJ.LisakD. (2009). False reports: Moving beyond the issue to successfully investigate and prosecute non-stranger sexual assault. The Voice, 3, 1–11.
49.
LovrichN. PPrattT. C.GaffneyM. J.JohnsonC. L.AsplenC. H.HurstL. H.SchellbergT. M. (2004). National forensic DNA study report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
50.
LussierP.CaleJ. (2013). Beyond sexual recidivism: A review of the sexual criminal career parameters of adult sex offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 445–457.
51.
LynchV. A. (2006). Forensic nursing science.f In HammerR. M.MoynihanB.PagliaroE. M. (Eds.), Forensic nursing: A handbook for practice (pp. 1–40). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
52.
MartinP. Y. (2005). Rape work: Victims, gender, and emotions in organization and community context. New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
McWhorterS. K.StanderV. A.MerrillL. L.ThomsenC. J.MilnerJ. S. (2009). Reports of rape reperpetration by newly enlisted Navy personnel. Violence & Victims, 24, 204–218.
54.
MukaseyM. B. (2008). DNA-sample collection and biological evidence preservation in the federal jurisdiction. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Federal Register.
55.
National Center for Victims of Crime. (2011). Sexual assault kit testing: What victims need to know. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime.
56.
National Research Council. (2009). Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
57.
NelsonM. S. (2010). Making sense of DNA backlogs, 2010-myths vs. reality. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Justice.
58.
Office on Violence Against Women. (2010, 511–12). Eliminating the rape kit backlog: A roundtable to explore a victim-centered approach (Roundtable Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
59.
ParnisD.DuMontJ. (2006). Symbolic power and the institutional response to rape: Uncovering the cultural dynamics of a forensic technology. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 43, 73–93.
60.
PattersonD. (2011a). The linkage between secondary victimization by law enforcement and rape case outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 328–347.
61.
PattersonD. (2011b). The impact of detectives’ manner of questioning on rape victims’ disclosure. Violence Against Women, 17, 1349–1373.
62.
PattersonD.CampbellR. (2010). Why rape survivors participate in the criminal justice system. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 191–205.
63.
PattersonD.CampbellR. (2012). The problem of untested sexual assault kits: Why are some kits never submitted to a crime laboratory?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2259–2275.
64.
PattersonD.CampbellR. (2013, 1). Examining a social injustice: Why are some rape kits never submitted to a crime laboratory?Paper presented at the Society for Social Work and Research Annual Conference, San Diego, CA.
65.
PetersonJ. L.JohnsonD.HerzD.GrazianoL.OehlerT. (2012). Sexual assault kit backlog study. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Justice.
66.
PetersonJ. L.SommersI.BaskinD.JohnsonD. (2010). The role and impact of forensic evidence in the criminal justice process. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Justice.
ResnickH.AciernoR.WaldropA. E.KingL.KingD.DanielsonC.…KilpatrickD. (2007). Randomized controlled evaluation of an early intervention to prevent post-rape psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2432–2447.
69.
RitterN. (2011). The road ahead: Unanalyzed evidence in sexual assault cases. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Justice.
70.
RoozendaalB.McEwenB. S.ChattarjiS. (2009). Stress, memory and the amygdala. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 423–433.
RubinD. C.BerntsenD.BohniM. K. (2008). A memory-based model of posttraumatic stress disorder: Evaluating basic assumptions underlying the PTSD diagnosis. Psychological Review, 115, 985.
73.
ShawJ. (2014). Justifying injustice: How the criminal justice system explains its response to sexual assault. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
74.
ShawJ.CampbellR. (2013). Sexual assault kit (SAK) submission among adolescent rape cases treated in forensic nurse examiner programs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 3400–3417.
75.
SherL. (2010). Neurobiology of suicidal behavior in post-traumatic stress disorder. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 10, 1233–1235.
76.
SouthwickS. M.RasmussonA.BarronJ.ArnstenA. (2005). Neurobiology and neurocognitive alterations in PTSD: A focus on norephinephrine, serotonin, and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. In VasterlingJ. J.BrewinC. R. (Eds.), Neuropsychology of PTSD: Biological, cognitive, and clinical perspectives (pp. 27–58). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
77.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2012). The criminal justice system’s response to sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 18, 169–192.
78.
StarzynskiL. L.UllmanS. E.FilipasH. H.TownsendS. M. (2005). Correlates of women’s sexual assault disclosure to informal and formal support sources. Violence and Victims, 20, 417–432.
79.
SteenkampM. M.DicksteinB. D.Salters-PedneaultK.HofmannS. G.LitzB. T. (2012). Trajectories of PTSD symptoms following sexual assault: Is resilience the modal outcome?Journal of Traumatic Stress, 25, 469–474.
80.
StevensA. P. (2001). Arresting crime: Expanding the scope of DNA databases in America. Texas Law Review, 79, 921–960.
81.
StromK. J.HickmanM. J. (2010). Unanalyzed evidence in law-enforcement agencies: A national examination of forensic processing in police departments. Criminology & Public Policy, 9, 381–404.
82.
StromK. J.HickmanM. J.Smiley McdonaldH. M.Ropero-MillerJ. D.StoutP. M. (2011). Crime laboratory personnel as criminal justice decision makers: A study of controlled substance case processing in ten jurisdictions. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal, 2, 57–69.
83.
SwartoutK. M.KossM. P.WhiteJ. W.ThompsonM. P.AbbeyA.BellisA. L. (in press). Trajectory analysis of the campus serial rapist assumption. JAMA Pediatrics.
84.
SwartoutA. G.SwartoutK. M.WhiteJ. W. (2011). What your data didn’t tell you the first time around: Advanced analytic approaches to longitudinal analyses. Violence Against Women, 17, 309–321.
TurmanK. M. (2001). Understanding DNA evidence: A guide for victim service providers. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime.
91.
UllmanS. E. (1996). Do social reactions to sexual assault victims vary by support provider?Violence and Victims, 11, 143–156.
92.
ValentineJ. L. (2014). Why we do what we do: A theoretical evaluation of the integrated practice model for forensic nursing science. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 10, 113–119.
